Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Case • בן 83בדיור מוגן .אלמן ואשתו נפטרה לפני חצי שנה • ברקע :יתר ל.ד ,.סוכרת עם סיבוכים ,תעוקת לב • שבועיים ירד בתפקוד .לא הגיע למועדון. • יום לפני העברה למיון ישן מול הטלוויזיה .היה קושי בדיבור ,אי שליטה בשתן • אין מחלת נפש ברקע • היה שקט ושיתף פעולה • נתרן נמוך ונמצא שיש לו UTI • פסיכאטר הגיע להעריך מצבו לדיכאון • לוקחInsulin, normiten, Vasodip, Aspirin : • במבחן MMSEצבר .9/30לא מסתקל אליך He is presenting as a classic example of hypoactive delirium however: • Urinary incontinence with altered mental status should prompt concerns about normal pressure hydrocephalus • He could have had a stroke or fall given his diabetes, hypertension and peripheral neuropathy- he needs a head CT • The UTI and hyponatremia could cause delirium and even with appropriate treatment mental status may take weeks and even months in the elderly- some may never return to baseline Other possible contributing factors: • Meds such as benzodiazapines • Glycemic abnormalities- how are his blood sugars? • Would need to rule out alcohol withdrawal or overdose-always do a urine tox screen • Is he depressed? • Is he demented? • The low MMSE reveals severe impairment which is common in delirium. His poor effort could signal inattention or depression. Confusion Dr Gary Sinoff Department of Gerontology University of Haifa Outline of Lecture 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Definition of Delirium Pathophysiology Epidemiology Clinical Presentation Causes Diagnosing Treatment Prognosis Confusion Confusion: a loss of one's capacity to think clearly and coherently, and it is a non-specific symptom of many different mental disorders or organic pathology. Both delirium and dementia are characterized by a global impairment in cognitive functioning. 8 Why is Delirium Important? Common, Morbidity/Mortality, & Costly! 1. Definition Characteristics of Delirium • Disturbance of consciousness • Abnormal cognition • Acute in onset and fluctuating in course • Precipitated by a cause • Misdiagnosis is frequent Definition DSM –IV TR (APA, 2000) 1. Disturbance of consciousness : reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention, easily distracted. 2. Disturbance in memory: disorientation to time and place, disturbed recall. 3. Disturbance in language: dysarthria, dysgraphia, incoherent speech, switching of topics. 4. Over a short period of time: usually hours to days, fluctuating during the course of the day 5. Evidence that it is caused by a medical condition, substance intoxication, or medication side effect. 2. Pathophysiology Many hypotheses exist including: • Neurotransmitter abnormalities • Inflammatory response with increased cytokines • Changes in the blood-brain barrier permeability • Widespread reduction of cerebral oxidative metabolism • Increased activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis Neurotransmitters and Cytokines • • • • • • • ↓ Acetylcholine ↑ Dopamine ↑ Noradrenaline ↑ Serotonin ↓ Histamine GABA Cytokines : IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF; IF 3. EPIDEMIOLOGY Prevalence Rates Common in hospitalized older adults: Approximately 40% of hospitalized elderly >65 • Emergency Department 10% • Post-hip fracture 35 - 65% • Surgical Wards 15 - 30% • General Medicine 11 - 26% • Known dementia 30 - 90% Residential care 9% -16% Community dwelling elderly? Expect higher rates with an ageing population and a shift away from hospital-based care. EPIDEMIOLOGY • Delirium is OFTEN UNRECOGNIZED!! • Many cases undiagnosed – ~40% of elderly with delirium sent home from ED in one study • Misdiagnosed as depression – ~40% of cases in one study Cole MG. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12(1):7-21 Epidemiology of delirium Delirious patients experience greater morbidity: • Prolonged hospitalizations • More hospital-acquired complications • Greater cognitive decline • Functional decline • High risk for institutionalization. Delirium Is Deadly !!! Mortality rates: 10% - 65% BUT With appropriate management, may be reversible in up to 50%. Recognizing Delirium Recognized by doctors Not recognized Recognized by nurses Not recognized – Nurses recognize and document <50% of cases – Physicians recognize and document only 20% 4. Clinical Presentation Prodrome Stage • Patients may describe and/or manifest: – Decreased concentration – Irritability, restlessness, anxiety, depression – Hypersensitivity to light and sound – Perceptual disturbances – Sleep disturbance Precipitating factors • • • • • • • • • • • Polypharmacy Infections Dehydration Immobility including restraint use Malnutrition The use of bladder catheters Sensory Deprivation Change of room High noise level Male gender Dementia Identified risk factors for prevention Cognitive impairment RR 3.6 Abnormal BP RR 2.3 CHF RR 2.9 < 10 mg morphine/day RR 5.4 “Severe pain” RR 9.0 Clinical characteristics • Develops acutely (hours to days) • Characterized by fluctuating level of consciousness. • Reduced ability to maintain attention • Agitation or hypersomnolence • Extreme emotional lability • Cognitive deficits occur • Disturbed concentration Types of delirium • Hyperactive or hyperalert • Hypoactive or hypoalert • Mixed Hyperactive or hyperalert – Patient is hyperactive, combative and uncooperative. – May appear to be responding to internal stimuli – Frequently these patients come to our attention because they are difficult to care for. Hypoactive or hypoalert – Patient appears to be sleeping on and off throughout the day – Unable to sustain attention when awakened, quickly falls back to sleep – Misses meals, medications, appointments – Does not ask for care or attention – This type is easy to miss because caring for these patients is not problematic to staff Mixed – a combination of both types just described – The most common types are hypoactive and mixed accounting for approximately 80% of delirium cases 5. Causes Causes • • • • • • • • • D E L I R I U M S Causes • Drugs - particularly narcotics and anticholinergics, withdrawal of alcohol and benzodiazepines • Endocrine - hypo /hyperglycemia, hypercalcemia, hypo /hyperthyroidism • Low oxygen – hypoxia • Infections - particularly UTI and pneumonia Causes • Retention- urinary • Inflammatory arthritis - gout, meningitis Intoxication • Underperfused – CHF, CVA, Acute MI • Metabolic – sodium, potasium, liver failure • Stool – fecal impaction Drugs commonly causing delirium: • Analgesics NSAIDs, opioids • Antibiotics Acyclovir, cephalosporins, penicillin, quinolones, sulfonamides, tobramycin • Anticholinergics • Anticonvulsants Carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproate • Antidepressants TCAs, SSRIs • Cardiovascular Amiodarone, B blockers, digoxin, diuretics • Corticosteroids • Dopamine agonists • H2 antagonists Cimetidine, famotidine, ranitidine • Sedative/Hypnotics • Miscellaneous Baclofen, donepezil, interferons, oral hypoglycemics 6. Diagnosis Diagnosis • History from family and/or caregivers • Bedside observations • DSM-IV diagnostic criteria • Reliable diagnostic instruments: – Confusion Assessment Method – The Delirium Rating Scale- Revised-98 – Delirium Symptom Review • Diagnostic errors are common in: – Hypoactive form – The setting of rapid fluctuations of cognition. Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) 1. History of acute onset of change in patient’s normal mental status & fluctuating course AND 2. Lack of attention AND EITHER 3. Disorganized thinking 4. Altered Level of Consciousness Sensitivity: 94-100% Specificity: 90-95% Kappa: 0.81 Inouye SK: Ann Intern Med 1990;113(12):941-8 Recognizing Delirium Lewis et al. Unrecognized delirium in ED geriatric patients. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13(2): 142-5. • • • • • • • • Compared the ED physician’s conventional assessment to the CAM 385 Patients over age 64 CAM: 38 of 385 (10% prevalence) Physician: 34 of above 38 charts completed 21 of 34 (62%) admitted Only 6 of 34 (17%) identified with delirium 13 of 34 (38%) discharged 6 of 13 (46%) discharged as “status post fall” Differentiation Between Delirium and Dementia Clinical feature Delirium Dementia Nature of onset Abrupt onset Gradual, ill-defined onset Rapidity of progression Rapid - hours Slow - months Duration of condition Temporary - days Long lasting - years Variability of symptoms Fluctuating from hour-tohour Lucid intervals common Stable from day-to-day No lucid intervals Attention span Very short, variable from moment-to-moment Unaffected in early disease, stable in chronic 41 disease 7. Treatment Treatment • Based mainly on observational data • Reduce or discontinue psychotropic, anticholinergic, narcotic medications. • Careful focus on intake, nutrition, physical therapy/mobility, aspiration risk. NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT Assess safety – Prevent harm to self or others – Try to avoid physical restraints Establish physiological stability – Adequate oxygenation – Restore electrolyte balance – Restore hydration Address modifiable risk factors – – – – Correct sensory deficits Manage pain Support normal sleep pattern Minimize room changes Delirium Reduction • You can get improvement of delirium with such simple measures as: – – – – – – – Glasses Using hearing aids Fluids/nutrition Reducing noise Early mobility Familiar faces Soft lighting Inouye S. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(9):669-76. Treatment • Morphine for pain control • SSRIs for suspected depression/anxiety • Benzodiazepines for anxiety • Neuroleptics for agitation 8. Prognosis Prognosis • Delirium is independently associated with: – Increased functional disability – Increased LOS – Admission to long-term care • Increased hospital mortality of 2 to 20 fold • May persist for months or indefinitely Delirium becomes chronic in substantial numbers of patients • Two factors related to better outcomes: – Admission from home – Better premorbid functioning Prognosis CMAJ 1993; 149 (1):41-6. Prognosis of delirium in elderly hospital patients. Cole MG; Primeau FJ • Medline, 1980-1992. Meta-analysis of 8 studies • N = 563 • LOS 21 days* 1 month 6 months Cognitively improved Institutionalized Died 55% 47%* 14%* 43%* * p < 0.05 Prognosis J Gen intern Med 1998; 13(4):234-42. Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes? A three-site epidemiololgic study. Inouye et al • • • • N = 727 New nursing home placement: OR 3.0 at d/c and at 3 months Death or new nursing home placement: OR 2.1 (2.6 at 3 mo) Functional decline: OR 3.0 (2.7 at 3 months) Institutionalized Institutionalized or died discharge 9% 14% 3 months 13% 25% Prognosis J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18(9):696-704. The course of delirium in older medical inpatients: a prospective study. McCusker et al. • N = 193 Discharge 12 months # delirium Sx (cog intact) 3.4 2.2 # delirium Sx (dementia) 4.5 3.5 Prognosis JAGS 2003; 51(7): 1002-6. Dementia after delirium in patients with femoral neck fractures. Lundstrom et al • 5 year prospective follow-up study • N = 78 Dementia Died No delirium 20% 35% Delirious 69% 72% Total group 38.5% Acute Confusional State Pearls • • • • Often not recognized Common among hospitalized patients Is frequently preventable Accounts for significant morbidity and mortality • Impaired attention is the hallmark 53 Acute Confusional State Pearls • In elderly think meds/polypharmacy first • Consider underlying dementia in elderly who develop ACS • Known dementia patients may develop ACS due to a treatable cause – it is not always deterioration due to dementia! • Common irritants such as constipation or urinary retention may cause ACS in the elderly 54 Acute Confusional State Pearls • Consider capacity, competency, and surrogate issues in informed consent of ACS patients – write it in the record! • There is often a time lag of days to weeks between effective Rx and clinical response (most significant lag in the elderly) 55 Next Week ????? בהצלחה