Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Direct search of electroweak-charged dark matter Natsumi Nagata Univ. of Minnesota/Kavli IPMU High Energy Theory Lunchtime Seminar April 23, 2015 in collaboration with J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, S. Shirai, T. Takesako 1. Introduction Introduction Evidence for dark matter (DM) Galactic scale Scale of galaxy clusters Clowe et. al. (2006) Begeman et. al. (1991) Cosmological scale 90◦ 18◦ 2 10 1◦ Angular scale 0.2◦ 0.1◦ 0.07◦ 6000 D [µK2] 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 50 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Multipole moment, Planck (2013) Planck (2013) Introduction Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) One of the most promising candidates for dark matter is Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) • have masses roughly between 10 GeV ~ a few TeV. • interact only through weak and gravitational interactions. • Their thermal relic abundance is naturally consistent with the cosmological observations [thermal relic scenario]. • appear in models beyond the Standard Model. Introduction Electroweak-interacting dark matter Quantum numbers of DM Uncolored & uncharged SU(2)L × U(1)Y charges are not determined. (n, Y) (1,0), (2, ± ½), (3,0), (3, ± 1), (4, ± ½) … Such a DM candidate often appears in high-energy theories. • Higgsino/wino DM in SUSY models • A remnant Z2 symmetry in SO(10) GUTs yield this class of DM candidates Work in progress with Y. Mambrini, K. Olive, and J. Zheng Introduction Electroweak-interacting dark matter Quantum numbers of DM Uncolored & uncharged SU(2)L × U(1)Y charges are not determined. (n, Y) (1,0), (2, ± ½), (3,0), (3, ± 1), (4, ± ½) … Such a DM candidate often appears in high-energy theories. • Higgsino/wino DM in SUSY models • A remnant Z2 symmetry in SO(10) GUTs yield this class of DM candidates Work in progress with Y. Mambrini, K. Olive, and J. Zheng Introduction Direct detection experiments Nucleus WIMP DM Recoil energy [Large Underground Xenon (LUX), arXiv: 1310.8214] • LUX experiment gives a stringent constraint on spinindependent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section. (for WIMPs of mass 33 GeV) • Ton-scale detectors for direct detection experiments are expected to yield significantly improved sensitivities. Introduction Electroweak-interacting fermion dark matter In what follows, we calculate the scattering cross sections of Majorana fermion DM (Y = 0) with a nucleon. • In this case, the cross sections are determined only by the gauge interactions • Scalar DM suffers from model-dependence • I will comment on the hypercharged DM cases (if I have enough time…) Introduction Electroweak-interacting fermion dark matter In what follows, we calculate the scattering cross sections of Majorana fermion DM (Y = 0) with a nucleon. Outline 1. Introduction 2. Direct detection of electroweak-interacting fermion DM 3. Hypercharged DM 1. Conclusion and discussion 2. Direct detection of electroweakinteracting dark matter Method of effective theories 1. By integrating out heavy particles, we obtain the effective interactions of WIMP DM with quarks and gluons. Operator Product Expansion (OPE) Ci (μ):Wilson coefficients include short-distant effects Oi (μ):Effective operators Higer-dimensional operators. Their nucleon matrix elements contain the effects of long-distance. μ:factorization scale A scale at which a high-energy theory is matched with the effective theory. Method of effective theories 1. By integrating out heavy particles, we obtain the effective interactions of WIMP DM with quarks and gluons. Operator Product Expansion (OPE) Ci (μ):Wilson coefficients include short-distant effects Oi (μ):Effective operators Higer-dimensional operators. Their nucleon matrix elements contain the effects of long-distance. μ:factorization scale A scale at which a high-energy theory is matched with the effective theory. Method of effective theories 1. By integrating out heavy particles, we obtain the effective interactions of WIMP DM with quarks and gluons. Operator Product Expansion (OPE) Ci (μ):Wilson coefficients include short-distant effects Oi (μ):Effective operators Higer-dimensional operators. Their nucleon matrix elements contain the effects of long-distance. μ:factorization scale A scale at which a high-energy theory is matched with the effective theory. Method of effective theories 2. Evaluate the nucleon matrix elements of the effective operators (at a certain scale). When evolving the operators down to the scale, we need to match the effective theories above/below each quark threshold. DM DM DM DM Q Q Q g g 3. By using the nucleon matrix elements, we evaluate the scattering cross section of DM with a nucleon Effective Lagrangian for Majorana DM Spin-independent Scalar-type Twist-2 type Twist-2 operator Effective Lagrangian for Majorana DM Spin-independent Scalar-type Induces coupling of DM with “mass of nucleon” Twist-2 type Twist-2 operator Effective Lagrangian for Majorana DM Spin-independent Scalar-type Induces coupling of DM with “quark and gluon momenta” Twist-2 type Twist-2 operator Nucleon matrix elements Quark (scalar-type) Nucleon matrix elements of scalar-type quark operators are evaluated by using the QCD lattice simulations. mass fractions (mN:Nucleon mass) Gluon contribution Mass fractions for proton H. Ohki et al. (2008) Remarks. Strange quark content is much smaller than those evaluated with the chiral perturbation theory. Nucleon matrix elements Gluon (scalar-type) Nucleon matrix element of scalar-type gluon operator is evaluated by using the trace anomaly of the energy-momentum tensor. Trace anomaly of the energy-momentum tensor in QCD(Nf = 3) L.O. in αs M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 443. Nucleon matrix elements Twist-2 operators Nucleon matrix elements of twist-2 operators are evaluated by using the parton distribution functions (PDFs). Here, q(2) and G(2) are called the second moments of PDFs, which are defined by J. Pumplin et al., JHEP 0207:012 Effective coupling of Majorana DM with nucleon The SI coupling of Majorana DM with nucleon is given as The gluon contribution turns out to be comparable to the quark contributions even if it is induced by higher loop diagrams. Effective coupling of Majorana DM with nucleon The SI coupling of Majorana DM with nucleon is given as The gluon contribution turns out to be comparable to the quark contributions even if it is induced by higher loop diagrams. Effective coupling of Majorana DM with nucleon The SI coupling of Majorana DM with nucleon is given as suppressed by αs The gluon contribution turns out to be comparable to the quark contributions even if it is induced by higher loop diagrams. Electroweak-interacting DM (n, 0) Interactions Mass difference Mass difference between the neutral and charged components is induced at loop level after the electroweak symmetry breaking. (Negligible in the following calculation) DM-nucleon scattering cross sections • Not induced at tree-level (loop-induced) • Determined as a function of DM mass Diagrams 1-loop ``Scalar” ``twist-2” These interactions are not suppressed even if the DM mass is much larger than the W boson mass. Non-decoupling effects J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M. Nojiri, O. Saito, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 015007. Diagrams 2-loop Gluon contribution Neglected in previous calculations 2-loop gluon contribution can be comparable to 1-loop quark contribution non-decoupling J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, and NN, Phys. Lett. B 690 (2010) 311. Fock-Schwinger gauge Fock-Schwinger gauge 10 -45 10 -46 10 -47 10 -48 Matrix element Higgs mass 2 SI cross section (cm ) Results Triplet case (3,0) 1000 2000 3000 DM Mass (GeV) • Cancellations among the contributions • Resultant SI cross sections are suppressed J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, and NN, Phys. Lett. B 690 (2010) 311. Uncertainty Cancellation results in large uncertainties QCD higher order Nucleon matrix R. J. Hill, M. P Solon (2011) • Uncertainty mainly comes from the perturbative QCD. • Need for higher order calculation. NLO calculation ! NLO result 〜 2.3 × 10-47 cm2 DM mass [GeV] • Perturbative QCD uncertainty is now smaller than the hadron matrix error • Resultant scattering cross sections are above neutrino BG J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, and NN, [arXiv:1504.00915]. Wino-like DM Tree-level χ̃ 0 χ̃ 0 h χ̃ 0 χ̃ 0 h0 0 Q q q g g Effective coupling (Zij: Neutralino mixing matrix) Wino-like DM Scattering cross sections with a proton • Cancellations between tree- and loop-level contributions occur at a certain value of μ • Loop contribution is dominant in a wide range of parameter region J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata, Phys. Rev. D87, 035020 (2013) . Wino-like DM Scattering cross sections with a proton Tree-level contribution interferes constructively to the loop contribution in the case of low tanβ The cross sections are within a reach of future experiments in a wide range of parameter regions J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata, Phys. Rev. D87, 035020 (2013) . 3. Hypercharged DM Hypercharged DM Hypercharged DM is excluded by direct detection experiments χ0 χ0 Dirac fermion Z0 q q DM-nucleon scattering cross section is too large. Hypercharged scalar DM is also excluded. e.g.) Left-handed sneutrino DM in the MSSM Hypercharged DM If there exists a new physics which gives mass splitting between the neutral components, Dirac fermion New physics effects Mass splitting Two Majorana fermions In this case, (Majorana condition) Direct detection constraints can be avoided. New physics effects The new physics effects which induce mass splitting can be described in terms of higher-dimensional operators that break “DM number” 4Y 4Y ψ: (n, Y), η: (n, -Y), H: Higgs field, Λ: cut-off scale Mass matrix M: Dirac mass A Dirac fermion splits into two Majorana fermions. New physics effects Example: Doublet (2, 1/2) DM ψ, η ψ, η H H Singlet and/or triplet Majorana fermion with a mass of 〜 Λ Cf.) Higgsino with (bino/wino) Inelastic scattering If the mass difference is too small, the hypercharged DM inelastically scatters off a nucleon χ 01 χ 02 Z0 q q If the mass difference is less than 〜 100 keV, this inelastic scattering process again yields too large cross section. Mass splitting To evade the direct detection constraint Larger hypercharge requires lower new-physics scale for We may probe them in future experiments. Dim-5 operators Generically, the following dim.-5 operators are also generated. Elastic scattering χ̃ 0 Electric dipole moments χ̃ 0 h χ̃ 0 χ̃ 0 h0 0 Q q q g g We can give a lower-bound on Λ Constraints & Prospects Inelast ic EDM SI (8 TeV,4, 32 ) (3 TeV,4, 32 ) (3 TeV,3,1) (1 TeV,4, 32 ) (1 TeV,3,1) (1 TeV,2, 12 ) (m D M , n, Y ) 103 104 105 106 Λ [GeV] 107 108 109 • Y = 3/2 DM is already being disfavored • Future experiments have sensitivities to Y = 1 DM • If Y = 1 case is excluded, remaining possibilities are Y = 0, or 1/2 NN and S. Shirai, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 055035. 4. Conclusion and discussion Summary • We evaluate the elastic scattering cross sections of electroweak-interacting fermionic DM with nucleon based on the method of effective theory. • The interaction of DM with gluon as well as quarks yields sizable contribution to the cross section, though the gluon contribution is induced at loop level. • NLO calculation makes the perturvative QCD uncertainty smaller than the error from the hadron matrix elements • Hypercharged DM is severely constrained. Y > ½ cases can be probed in future experiments NLO result (3,0) (2,1/2) (5,0) Y = 0 cases may also be probed. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, and NN, [arXiv:1504.00915]. Signature?? Signature?? Still consistent with theoretical prediction G. Giesen, et. al. , [arXiv:1504.04276]. Signature?? 2.2 TeV 3 TeV 1.7 TeV 3 TeV M. Ibe, et. al. , [arXiv:1504.05554]. K. Hamaguchi, et. al. , [arXiv:1504.05937]. 〜 3 TeV triplet DM may explain the “excess”. 3 TeV 1.2 TeV Summary • We evaluate the elastic scattering cross sections of electroweak-interacting fermionic DM with nucleon based on the method of effective theory. • The interaction of DM with gluon as well as quarks yields sizable contribution to the cross section, though the gluon contribution is induced at loop level. • NLO calculation makes the perturvative QCD uncertainty smaller than the error from the hadron matrix elements • Hypercharged DM is severely constrained. Y > ½ cases can be probed in future experiments Backup Singlet scalar DM T. Abe, R. Kitano, and R. Sato, [arXiv:1411.1335]. If we require that the thermal relic abundance is equal to the present DM density, then λSH is determined as a function of the DM mass. Loop functions • Non-relativistic scattering • No mass difference Classical process Scalar Twist-2 NLO scalar NLO Twist-2 Scale dependence PDF scales PDF error QCD higher order J. Hisano, N. Nagai, and NN, [arXiv:1502.02244]. Electroweak-interacting DM J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata, and T. Takesako, JHEP 1107 (2011) 005. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, A. Strumia, JHEP 1308 (2013) 022. Neutrino BG J. Billard, E. Figueroa-Feliciano, L. Strigari [arXiv: 1307.5458]. Higgs-nucleon coupling Large mass fractions (f_Tq large) Higgs-nucleon couplings are enhanced Input parameters H. Y. Cheng (1989) ■ Lattice results (ours) ■ Chiral perturbation (traditional) M. M. Pavan et al. (2002) H. Ohki et al. (2008) B. Borasoy and U. G. Meissner (1997)