Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
BREAST CANCER: SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY LIST SERV SCENARIO 5: ELDERLY HEALTHY PATIENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES CASE PRESENTATION 1. Discuss indications for SLNB ● 77 year old completely healthy woman living on her own, engaged in an active lifestyle, is found to have a 2 cm lesion in the lateral aspect of her left breast. ● Nodes are clinically negative. 2. Discuss indications for completion dissection of the axilla 3. Discuss the role of MCCs INVESTIGATIONS QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION Technique ● Core biopsy reveals invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). 1. Would you perform SLNB? 2. Are there any primary tumour characteristics that would affect your decision? FOLLOW-UP TECHNIQUE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION You go ahead and perform a lumpectomy and SLNB: ● Two SLNs are removed. No introperative frozen section is available. ● One has a 3 mm metastases seen on H&E (ie. a macrometasis) in the formalin fixed paraffin embedded sections. 1. Should the patient have an ALND? 2. What if the metastases were 1 mm in maximal dimension (ie. a micrometasis)? 3. What if the metastasis was 0.1 mm in maximal dimension (ie. isolated tumor cells "ITCs")? 4. Should this case be presented at a Multi-disciplinary Cancer Conference (MCC)? GUIDELINE INFORMATION ● “Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-stage Breast Cancer: Guideline Recommendations”: http://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=45870 ● For key evidence, see pages 18, 26-28 of the Evidentiary Base (Section 2) of the guideline. ● Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Standards”: http://www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/one.aspx? pageId=10473). BREAST CANCER: SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY LIST SERV SCENARIO 5: ELDERLY HEALTHY PATIENT FOLLOW-UP KEY LEARNING POINTS SLNB and ALND ● There was agreement that SLNB is safe in the elderly patient and most surgeons would recommend SLNB and if positive, then perform ALND. The two issues to consider with regards to the management of the axilla of this patient are local disease control and guidance of adjuvant therapy. Performing SLNB obviates the risks of full ALND in patients where the node is negative. However, if there is a positive node, then the completion ALND is appropriate at least for local control, even if it does not change the decision about chemotherapy. ● Generally, adjuvant chemotherapy is not given to elderly patients. However, it was suggested that in a healthy patient over 75 with an ER negative cancer, that chemotherapy might be offered if they are node positive. In the situation of a low grade, ER positive cancer, nodal status may not affect recommendations for chemotherapy. ● Patients in this age group may benefit the most from endocrine therapy if they are ER positive. ● Although some of the participants commented that ER status, differentiation and LVI might have an impact on the decision to perform a SLNB, this information is usually not available before surgical decisionmaking. ● Nodel metastases > 0.2 mm and < 2.0 mm are considered micromestastases and are an indication for ALND. ● In the case where the metastases were 1 mm in maximal dimension (ie. a micrometasis), it was suggested that after patient discussion, one could proceed with a completion ALND. ● In the case where the metastasis was 0.1 mm in maximal dimension (ie. isolated tumor cells "ITCs"), after patient discussion, one would likely not proceed with completion ALND. For micrometastases and ITC's, it was suggested that other factors such as tumour grade and estrogen receptor status be considered to help guide the discussion with the patient regarding treatment options. MCC ● There was disagreement regarding the presentation of this case at an MCC. Some felt that if there was pressure to present other cases because of volumes, then a patient scenario of this type of scenario would be low priority for MCC presentation. It was also felt that for surgeons who do a large volume of breast surgery and SLNB, that this case would be a reasonably common one, and that after discussions with one's local colleagues at a MCC, the surgeon would have a good sense of the group opinion without presenting each such case.