Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Report of Director of Place and Wellbeing To PLANNING COMMITTEE 27th JUNE 2016 TREE PRESERVATION ORDER LAND AT GRESSINGHAM CLOSE, FOREST TOWN, MANSFIELD, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (2014) 1. Summary On 7th March 2016 a Provisional Tree Preservation Order (TPO) was served on Land at Gressingham Close, Forest Town, Mansfield. 2. Recommendation To confirm the Tree Preservation Order as per attached map and schedule. 3. Background A Provisional TPO was served on land Off Gressingham Close, Forest Town, Mansfield, following the receipt of a request that a large oak tree, forming part of a group, be either felled or be subject to substantial tree works The tree forms part of a group of trees, comprising 2, Quercus spp (English Oak) 6, Acer spp. (Sycamore) 2, Ilex spp. (Holly) located within a residential development which is nearing completion. The trees are mature species, and were retained on site as part of the overall development. The occupier of the house located opposite, and facing the trees has requested that a large oak tree, forming part of the group, be either felled or be subject to substantial tree works. The works proposed to the Oak tree were considered harmful to the future life expectancy and visual amenity of the tree. Whilst serving a provisional TPO for the tree directly subject to the notification, it was considered prudent and logical to serve the provisional TPO upon the entire group of trees. Whilst some of the trees are individually good specimens, it is the collective value of the trees which specifically contributes to the special character of the area. 4. Objection/support Two emails have been received from the occupier of No 35 Gressingham Close who had originally requested the works to the oak tree outside of her property, objection to the TPO. Their grounds for opposing the TPO are that:• Maintenance. The trees are deciduous, and not only shed their leaves each year, but some of them i.e. the Oak directly outside of their house, also drop acorns and twigs and flowers causing debris and litter on the private driveway in front of their property and on the garden, a problem that lasts for approximately 5 months each year. The debris requires constant attention to keep clear, time which the objector do not have. In addition, all debris on the private drive becomes a ‘sludge’ in wet weather with vehicles passing over it, becoming slippery and blocking drainage on the driveway. • Health and Safety issues. A large branch on the main oak tree outside of the objectors property projects towards their property and is considered to be a danger, and could fall causing damage to property or injury to people. The debris/leaves etc. that fall from the trees also creates a slip hazard on the footpaths and highway to the detriment of the safety of residents, their children visitors and general public. • Impact upon residential amenity. Consider their property at 35 Gressingham Court is the property most affected by the trees. Leaves blow all over property and garden, detracting from the visual appearance of the property and creating a substantial burden on maintaining and the cleaning the property and land in a reasonable condition. Would suggest that the trees are removed and replanted with evergreen trees that would not cause a problem The trees are the only remaining trees on site that formed part of the former farm on site that existed prior to the residential development. It is considered that they create some maturity within the overall residential development, and have formed part of the overall residential scheme, forming part of the Public Open Space serving the development. The trees were inspected by the Councils Tree Officer who concluded that the group of trees made a valuable contribution to the character and visual amenity of the area and were worthy of protection by a TPO. It is acknowledged that deciduous trees generate some leaf litter, however it is not considered that this is justification in itself for the removal of the trees, as they can be blown considerable distance in the wind, and can be readily cleared up, albeit possibly on a regular basis. A Tree Preservation Order does not prevent works to trees, but gives greater protection to trees which are considered to be of amenity value, and which contribute the character and visual amenity of both the immediate and wider area. It is acknowledged that trees will need to be managed, and that some work would be required at times to maintain the health, viability and attractiveness of trees within the group. Trees which are either dead, dying or dangerous may be removed with appropriate notification, and the land owners would be able to apply for works to trees within the woodland as and where appropriate in the interests of the health and safety of the trees. Accordingly whilst there is no immediate evidence of the trees displaying any undue symptoms, appropriate works may be undertaken to them in the future as considered necessary and appropriate. The nearest tree to the objector’s property comprises a mature oak, with the tip of the nearest branch being a minimum of 4m from the nearest part of the dwelling. It is not considered that the proposal will result in any potential damage to the dwelling. 5. Options Available. 1. Confirm the TPO as per attached map and schedule 2. Confirm the TPO with modifications. 3. Do not confirm the TPO and let it lapse after the 6 month period expires. 6. Budget Resources Implications There are no budgetary or resource implications associated with confirming the TPO. 7. Alignment to Council Priorities The protection of these trees would align with the Council’s priority to develop a high quality, clean, green and pleasant environment. 8. Implications relating to relevant legislation This course of action is in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Trees) Regulations 1999. 9. Background Papers Tree Preservation Orders – A Guide to the Law and Good Practice (2000) DETR Report author - S. Dutfield Designation - Senior Development Control Officer Telephone - 463206 E-mail - [email protected]