Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 • Spending and Costs Introduction 3 Chapter 1 Advances in Treatment 4 Chapter 2 Medicines in Development 17 Chapter 3 Value and Spending 24 INTRODUCTION Researchers and clinicians are making remarkable progress in the fight against cancer; death rates have declined overall and for many patients, cancer has become a chronic condition to be managed, instead of a death sentence. However, the many different forms of cancer still cause enormous suffering for patients and their families, and a substantial economic burden in the United States. New cancer medicines, along with screening and prevention efforts, play a valuable role in improving patient outcomes. To sustain continued progress in an environment of increasing pressure to contain health care costs, it is important to understand the role innovative treatments play in the fight against cancer. 1 ADVANCES IN CANCER TREATMENT Cancer Medicines Are Benefiting Patients In recent decades we have seen remarkable progress in the fight against cancer. Research has advanced from viewing cancer as a monolithic disease to understanding it better on a molecular and genomic level. With this greater understanding has come an increase in treatment options that have helped to lengthen lives, improve patients’ quality of life, and increase productivity. Patients today have better treatment options than ever before. 1 • Advances in Treatment Five-Year Survival is Increasing for Many Types of Cancer Since 1975, the chances that a cancer patient will live 5 years or more have increased by 41% across cancers.1 5-Year Survival Rates Among the Most Common Cancers, 1975-20111 100% 100% 92% 80% 1975 2012 75% 68% 60% 67% 50% 40% 83% of survival gains in cancer are attributable to new treatments — including medicines.2 20% 19% 12% 0% Breast Cancer Prostate Cancer Colon/Rectum Lung/Bronchus Sources: 1) American Cancer Society, “Cancer facts & Figures 2016,” http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-047079.pdf. 2) E. Sun, et al., “The Determinants of Recent Gains in Cancer Survival: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 2008 Suppl (Abstract 1 • Advances in Treatment 6616); http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-044552.pdf. Since Peaking in the Early 1990s, Cancer Death Rates Have Declined 23%1 Increases in cancer survival are estimated to translate to the avoidance of nearly 1.7 million cancer deaths.1 Cancer Death Rate (Number of Deaths Due to Cancer per 100,000) U.S. Death Rates from Cancer Decline Over Time2 - 23% 200 150 100 50 0 215 166.3 1991 2012 Sources: 1) American Cancer Society, “Cancer facts & Figures 2016,” http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-047079.pdf. 2) National Cancer Institute and End Results database, “SEER Stat Fact Sheet: Cancer of Any Site,” http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/all.html. Accessed May 2016. 1 •Surveillance, AdvancesEpidemiology, in Treatment The Number of Cancer Survivors is Steadily Rising The continued increase in survival rates is in large part attributable to earlier detection and better treatments.1 U.S. Cancer Survivors Over Time1,2,3 19 million 13.7 million 9.8 million 3 million 1971 2001 2014 2024 (Projected) Sources: 1) American Cancer Society, “Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures, 2014-2015,” http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-042801.pdf. 2) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Cancer Survivors-United States, 2007,” 10 March 2011, http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivorship/what_cdc_is_doing/research/survivors_article.htm. 3) R Siegel, et al., “Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Statistics, 2012.,” CA: 1 • Journal Advances in Treatment A Cancer for Clinicians. doi: 10.3322/caac.21149. Survival Rates for Childhood Cancers Have Increased 43% Over the Last Several Decades Experts attribute gains in pediatric cancer survival to new and improved treatments, as well as high rates of participation in clinical trials. 5-Year Survival Rates Among Childhood Cancer Patients + 43% 83% 58% mid-1970s Today 1 •American Advances inSociety, Treatment Source: Cancer “Cancer facts & Figures 2016,” http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-047079.pdf. Ongoing Research and Use of a Medicine Over Time Reveals Additional Benefits That May Not Have Been Recognized Initially FDA approval and introduction of a new therapy is a significant milestone for patients but it is only the beginning. Additional value may be realized over time through:1 Earlier use Use in combination with other agents Use in specific sub-populations of patients using diagnostics Use in other disease indications Our knowledge of the full benefits of a therapy emerges over time, through continued research and real world clinical practice. “The relative value of a given cancer treatment is likely to change over its lifetime… the assessment of the value of any treatment must be dynamic and adapt to new medical information that may better inform its use, mitigate its toxicity, or modify its place in the treatment landscape.” — American Society of Clinical Oncology2 Source: 1) Boston Healthcare Associates, “The Value of Innovation in Oncology: Recognizing Emerging Benefits Over Time,” Boston Healthcare Associates, Inc., May 2015. 2) ASCO. 9 ASCO 1 • Advances in Treatment Publishes Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of New Cancer Treatment Options. June 22, 2015; Ongoing Research Reveals Efficacy in Additional Targeted Patient Group: Crizotinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Initially approved to treat patients with ALK+ mutated NSCLC, rapidly evolving science and ongoing research revealed that crizotinib is effective in treating another rare, difficult-to-treat form of the disease as well. 2011 Accelerated approval in ALK+ patients, based on evidence of tumor shrinkage (surrogate endpoint) 2016 NEW indication approved for patients with a different genetic subtype (ROS-1+) 2013 Regular, confirmatory approval granted based on superior progression-free survival “The expanded use of Xalkori will provide a valuable treatment option for patients with the rare and difficult to treat ROS-1 gene mutation by giving health care practitioners a more personalized way of targeting ROS-1 positive NSCLC.” - Dr. Richard Pazdur, director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, U.S. FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Sources: Timeline: National Cancer Institute, “FDA Approval for Crizotinib,” http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-crizotinib (Accessed May 2016). Quote: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “FDA expands use of Xalkori to treat rare form of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” 1 • Advances in Treatment http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm490329.htm. Continuing Research Reveals Greater Benefit in Targeted Patient Population: Gefitinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) After approval, clinical studies in broader NSCLC patient population showed limited efficacy. However, ongoing research revealed that patients with a specific mutation demonstrated significant survival gains. 2003 Accelerated approval as second- or thirdline treatment based on tumor shrinkage 2015 Approved for first-line use in patients with specific mutations (EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R substitutions) 2005 Indication limited to those currently benefiting from treatment due to ongoing clinical studies that fail to show significant survival “Gefitinib is a textbook example of how much oncology has changed over the past decade. The trial to follow up and get full approval of gefitinib wasn't designed with smart selection of patients based on mutations.” -Dr. Lecia Sequist, Medical Oncologist, Massachusetts General Hospital Sources: Timeline: National Cancer Institute, “FDA Approval for Gefitinib.” http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-gefitinib (Accessed May 2016).; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Gefitinib (Iressa),” http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm454692.htm (accessed May 2016).Quote: “Gefitinib Approved for EGFR-Mutated 1 • Advances in Treatment NSCLC.” Cancer Discovery September 2015 5:896.. Targeted Therapies Drive Survival Gains in Chronic Leukemias Since the approval of the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), survival rates have improved dramatically and patients are living close to normal life spans.1 • Imatinib—the first TKI—was approved in 2001 to treat CML. The transformative impact of this class of medicines had not been completely realized. • After initial approval, continued research revealed that imatinib had a greater impact when initiated earlier in the progression of the disease. • Further research also revealed that imatinib was effective in combating other types of cancer • 5-Year Survival Rates for CML Patients Nearly Triple After Introduction of Imatinib2 89% 31% Additional TKIs have since been approved that target mutated forms of CML in patients who have become resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Prior to Introduction of Imatinib After Introduction of Imatinib Source: 1) PhRMA, “A Decade of Innovation in Rare Diseases: 2005‐2015,” http://www.phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/PhRMA-Decade-of-Innovation-Rare-Diseases.pdf, 2015; 2) American Cancer Society, “Cancer Facts and Figures 2016,” 2016; BJ Druker, et al., “Five‐year follow‐up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia,” N Engl J Med. 2006; 1 • Advances in Treatment 355(23):2408‐17. Cervical Cancer: Reduced Incidence of Cancer-Causing HPV Infections Among teenage girls, widespread use of the quadrivalent human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine has driven down infection rates by nearly two-thirds. Source: Markowitz, L, et al. “Prevalence of HPV After Introduction of the Vaccination Program in the United States.” Pediatrics. March 2016. 1 • Advances in Treatment http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/02/19/peds.2015-1968. Immunotherapy is Revolutionizing the Treatment of Many Advanced Cancers: Metastatic Melanoma Immuno-oncology medicines are enabling the body to unleash the brakes on the immune system, overcoming signals that cancer cells have exploited. Early advances in advanced melanoma are particularly promising. Note: Data from KEYNOTE-001 pembrolizumab clinical study “No recent cancer advance has been more transformative than immunotherapy. These new therapies are not only transforming patient lives, they are also opening intriguing avenues for further research.” - Dr. Julie M. Vose, President of the American Society of Clinical Oncology3 Sources: 1) ASCO, “PD-1 Inhibitor Pembrolizumab Provides Long-Term Survival Benefit for Patients With Advanced Melanoma,” May 18, 2016, https://www.asco.org/about-asco/press-center/news-releases/pd1-inhibitor-pembrolizumab-provides-long-term-survival; 2) The ASCO Post. “ASCO Names Advance of the Year, Highlights Major Top Research Trends.” February 10 2016. http://www.ascopost.com/issues/february-10-2016/asco-names-advance-of-the-year-highlights-major-top-research-trends/; 3)Southall, A. “Former President Jimmy Carter Says He is Free of Cancer.” 1 • Advances in Treatment http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/07/us/jimmy-carter-cancer.html. Dec. 6, 2015. Cancer Treatment Advances Result in Substantial Gains to Society 23 MILLION = $1.9 TRILLION = Years of life saved due to cancer treatment advances, 1988-2000 Value of improved cancer treatment to society based on improved productivity, extended life and other factors, 1988-2000 1 •DNAdvances Source: Lakdawala ,in et Treatment al. , “An economic evaluation of the war on cancer,” Journal of Health Economics. May 2010. 29(3):333-346. Continued Innovation in Cancer Treatment Could Echo HIV/AIDS Successes As HIV/AIDS treatments improved, spending became sustainable. It is estimated that, as a result of highly active antiretroviral treatments (HAART), we were able to avoid over 862,000 premature deaths, gain over 27 million life-years, and gain $615 billion in economic value over the cost of treatment in the United States alone. “Remember HIV?.... thanks to a wave of new discoveries that came both from academic centers and the pharmaceutical industry, the HIV crisis was transformed into a stable condition which is managed very differently by society where good drugs are available. They are controlling the disease, and society has been saving an enormous amount of money as a result of these innovative drugs by providing better care out of hospitals.” — Hervé Hoppenot, President, Incyte Pharmaceuticals Sources: Truven Health Analytics http://truvenhealth.com/Portals/0/Assets/Life-Sciences/White-Papers/pharma-innovation-hiv-aids-treatment.pdf; M Kean, T Lessor (Eds.), “Sustaining 5 • Against Improving Care Sustained Innovation Progress CancerCancer in an Era of CostThrough Containment Discussion Paper,” June 2012, available at: www.TurningTheTideAgainstCancer.org. 16 2 MEDICINES IN DEVELOPMENT Discovery and Development of Cancer Medicines The R&D process remains challenging and expensive but advances in basic science have opened new doors for biopharmaceutical researchers. More than 1,200 new cancer medicines are in clinical development in the U.S. These medicines represent a wide range of novel approaches. Patients today have more reason to hope than ever before. 2 • Medicines in Development 17 Promise in the Pipeline: More than 800 Medicines in Development for Various Cancers Number of Medicines in Development in the United States, September 2015, Selected Cancer Types* Bladder Cancer Brain Cancer Breast Cancer Colorectal Cancer Head/Neck Cancer Hematological Malignancies Kidney Cancer Leukemia Liver Cancer Lung Cancer Lymphoma Multiple Myeloma Ovarian Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Prostate Cancer Phase I Phase II Phase III Application Submitted “These are exciting times… the pace of discovery and application of new knowledge to patient care is rapidly accelerating.” — Dr. Jose Baselga, Physician-inChief, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, President of the American Association for Cancer Research Sarcoma Skin Cancer Stomach Cancer Other Cancers *Some medicines are being explored in more than one therapeutic category. 18 Sources: PhRMA, “Cancer Medicines in Development,” September 2015, http://phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/oncology-report-2015.pdf; American Association for Cancer Research. 2 • Medicines in Development “Jose Baselga, MD, PhD” http://cancerprogressreport.org/2015/Pages/baselga.aspx . Biopharmaceutical Companies are Driving Advances in Targeted Cancer Therapy Personalized medicines are transforming the treatment of many forms of cancer and the pipeline has never been more promising. 12-50% Of new drugs in the pipeline are reportedly personalized medicines (across all diseases) 19 2 •1)Medicines Sources: Tufts Center in for Development the Study of Drug Development (CSDD). Personalized medicine gains traction but still faces multiple challenges. Tufts CSDD Impact Rep. 2015. Cancer Researchers Build on Knowledge Gained from Setbacks in Order to Inform Future Advances Developing a new cancer medicine is a complex process, fraught with setbacks, but these so called “failures” are not wasted efforts. Researchers learn from them to inform future study and direct research efforts. “The scientific process is thoughtful, deliberate, and sometimes slow, but each advance, while helping patients, now also points toward new research questions and unexplored opportunities.” — Clifford A. Hudis, MD, FACP Chief, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College *Setbacks and advances from 1998 to 2014 20 2 •PhRMA, Medicines in Development Source: “Researching Cancer Medicines: Setbacks and Stepping Stones,” http://www.phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2014-cancer-setbacks-report.pdf, 2014. New Approaches to Treating Cancers Represent the Majority of Medicines in the Oncology Pipeline Researchers are using novel approaches to attack cancer at the molecular level. An average of 80% of drugs in the oncology pipeline may be first-in-class medicines. Percentage of Projects in Development that Are Potentially Novel Approaches in Selected Cancer Areas, 2011 Bladder cancer 75% Blood cancers 77% Breast cancer 76% Colorectal cancer 81% Lung cancer 75% Melanoma 91% Prostate cancer 75% Cancer, general 80% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Source: G. Long and J. Works. “Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Pipeline: A Multidimensional View.” Boston, MA: Analysis Group, January 2013. Available at 2 • Medicines in Development www.analysisgroup.com/uploadedFiles/Publishing/Articles/2012_Innovation_in_the_Biopharmaceutical_Pipeline.pdf (accessed May 2016). Major Scientific Advances in Cancer Treatment Pipeline Give Patients Hope The cancer pipeline is ripe with innovative therapeutic options. Emerging combinations of medicines hold particular promise for controlling and killing cancer cells. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Adoptive Cell Therapy involves the modification of individuals’ immuneboosting T-cells to target and kill blood cancer cells. Oncolytic viral therapies zero in on cancer cells, replicate, and cause them to rupture. Cancer Metabolism-Targeting Drugs disrupt cancer cell metabolism and can impede cancer cell growth. Immunotherapies help target and kill cancer cells by “releasing the breaks” on the immune system. CRISPR Gene Editing allows researchers to manipulate cancer cell function. “We are in the midst of a sea change in how we are treating cancer. We’re really seeing the fruits of many years of research into what drives cancer and how it interacts with the immune system to defeat it and survive.” - Dr. Louis Weiner, director of the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Sources: World Medical Innovation Forum: Cancer. “Disruptive Dozen 2016.” http://worldmedicalinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Partners-FORUM-2016-BROCHURE-D12Cancer-160422_0942-FREV1-WEB-X3-SM-SPREADS.pdf; McGinley, L. “The list of cancers that can be treated by immunotherapy keeps growing.” The Washington Post. 2 • Medicines in Development https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/04/19/breakthrough-cancer-therapy-shows-growing-promise/ CAR-T Therapy Driving Breakthroughs for Cancer Patients 2 • Medicines in Development 3 3 • Spending and Costs VALUE AND SPENDING Understanding the Value of Cancer Medicines New cancer medicines bring great value to patients and the health care system. It is important to view cancer spending in the context of health care spending overall. Likewise, cancer medicines are a crucial part of oncology treatment but represent just a small portion of cancer costs. 24 Spending on Cancer Medicines Represents About 1% of Overall Health Care Spending Cancer Medicines as a Portion of NHE Projected Total U.S. Health Care Spending, Billions, 2015 $39.1 Billion Cancer Drug Spending $3.2 Trillion* Total Health Care Spending $124 billion All Remaining Health Care Spending * 2015 CMS Total National Health Expenditures Number is a projection Source: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics, “Medicines Use and Spending in the U.S.: A Review of 2015 and Outlook to 2020”; CMS National Health Expenditures Projections. July • Spending and Costs 2015.3https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsProjected.html Average Price Growth of Cancer Drugs in Medicare Part B Less than Medical Inflation The trend of volume-weighted Average Sales Price (ASP) for cancer drugs administered through Medicare Part B has been growing more slowly than overall medical inflation Weighted ASP vs. CPI-M* $10.00 500 450 $8.00 400 $6.00 300 250 $4.00 200 150 $2.00 100 50 $- - Oncology Drugs Medical Care Note: Total retail sales including brand medicines and generics. * 2014 Weighted ASP numbers are projections. 3 •The Spending and Costs Source: Moran Company. Trends in Weighted Average Sales Prices for Prescription Drugs in Medicare Part B, 2006-2013. April 2014. CPI-M Weighted ASP 350 Part B Cancer Medicines Are Serving Unmet Medical Needs According to the Government Accountability Office, medicines under Medicare Part B have an important role in advancing patient care. 25 new Part B cancer • FDA’s expedited review programs are designed to accelerate the development and review of new drugs that meet unmet medical needs. • New Part B cancer therapies are serving previously unmet medical needs for patients with colorectal cancer, renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, multiple myeloma, leukemia, and lymphoma. • The modest increase in Part B spending primarily reflects uptake of these important advances, not changes in price. medicines approved 2006-2013 88% of these products were approved with expedited review. Source: 3 •Government SpendingAccountability and Costs Office. “Expenditures for New Drugs Concentrated among a Few Drugs, and Most Were Costly for Beneficiaries.” October 2015. Patients in Only 6 Countries Had Access to at Least Half of the 49 New Oncology Medicines Launched 2010-2014 2015 Global Availability of Oncology Medicines Launched 2010-2014 8 11 12 18 21 21 25 26 27 29 29 30 36 36 49 41 38 37 31 28 28 24 23 22 20 20 19 Available 13 13 40 42 43 43 43 44 9 7 6 6 6 5 48 1 Not Available Notes: Includes innovative medicines, often referred to as New Active Substances or New Chemical Entities, first launched globally between 2010 and 2014. Availability is based on sales in audited markets, regardless of reimbursement rates. Supportive care medicines are not included. Source: IMS Institute for HealthCare Informatics. “Global Oncology Trend Report. A Review of 2015 and Outlook to 2020”. Even When Commercially Available, Not All Cancer Medicines Are Reimbursed Under Public Insurance Programs Percent of Approved Cancer Medicines Reimbursement Status of Cancer Medicines Approved in 2014 and 2015 100% 43% 90% 62% 65% 67% 71% 71% 71% 76% 38% 35% 33% 29% 29% 29% 24% 95% 80% 70% 60% 50% 100% 40% 30% 57% 20% 10% 5% 0% U.S France United Kingdom Australia Scotland Reimbursed Sweden Germany Italy Canada Spain Not Reimbursed Note: The categorization of not-reimbursed does not mean that there is no patient access to these medicines , and there may be non-standard means for obtaining access to new medicines through special funds and submission of applications for approval outside of standard guidelines. Source: IMS Institute for HealthCare Informatics. “Global Oncology Trend Report. A Review of 2015 and Outlook to 2020”. The Role of Personalized Medicines Has Grown in the Last Decade Personalized medicines provide effective and efficient care by targeting the right medicine to the right patient. Oncology Treatment Modalities in Top Pharmaceutical Markets, 2003-2013 2013 2003 11% 11% 24% 48% 26% 15% 46% Targeted 46% Medicines 10% 20% Source: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics, “Innovation in Cancer Care and Implications for Health Systems: Global Oncology Trend Report,” May 2014. Over Time, Targeted Oncology Drugs Generate Additional Treatment Options for New Indications Through ongoing research, our understanding of the genetic and molecular mutations driving cancer cell growth is uncovering commonalities among cancer types and the medicines used to treat them. Targeted Oncology Medicine FDA Approval Type by Year 10 9 14 5 3 9 4 6 2 2 1 3 2 4 1 3 7 2 2 11 6 4 3 2 1 1 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 First Approvals Subsequent Approvals Source: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics, “Medicines Use and Spending in the U.S.: A Review of 2015 and Outlook to 2020”; CMS National Health Expenditures Projections. July 2015. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsProjected.html. Health Plans Have Powerful Tools to Reduce Spending on Cancer Medicines Current and Anticipated Payer Measures to Manage Oncology Costs Utilizing one or more value frameworks* in the evaluation of new cancer therapies to determine physician reimbursement, price-for-performance (pay for value), preferential utilization contracts, etc. Implementing steps to increase savings from non-oncology categories Using clinical pathways to determine which treatment regimens will be approved for patients 31% 25% Q1 2016 27% 25% 35% 39% 59% Contracting for preferred agents among first-line therapies 52% Percentage of Payers *Value Frameworks: NCCN Evidence Blocks, ASCO Value Framework, etc. Source: Zitter Health Insights , Managed Care Oncology Index, 2016. Q1 2017 Insurance Covers a Lower Share of Prescription Drug Costs than of Other Medical Services On average, patients pay out of pocket nearly 20% of their total prescription drug spending, compared to 5% of spending for hospital care. Average Share of Health Costs Patients Pay Out of Pocket, All Ages 40% 30% 20% 19% Average, All Health Care 10% 5% 0% Hospital Prescription Drugs* *Includes brand and generic Sources: PhRMA analysis of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2009. Available at www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/ (accessed March 2014). Prescription drug spending includes brand and generic ingredients, pharmacy, and distribution costs. Estimates are not restricted to individuals who have private coverage that includes prescription coverage, which can be expected to account for less than 2%.; P.J. Cunningham. “Despite the Recession's Effects on Incomes and Jobs, the Share of People with High Medical Costs was Mostly Unchanged.” Health Affairs 2012; 31(11): 2563–2570. Multiple Factors Contribute to the Financial Burden Faced by Cancer Patients Physician services, transportation expenses, and inability to work, among other things, also drive the cost burden on cancer patients, often more so than prescription drugs. Top Patient Financial Concerns Among cancer patients who contacted the National Patient Advocate Foundation for financial help with in 2015. Co-pay for facility/doctor visits 10.4% Transportation 8.8% Co-pay for drugs 7.4% Rent/mortgage 6.2% Utilities 4.7% Source: J. O’Donnell. “Patient groups funded by drugmakers are largely mum on high drug prices,” USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/01/21/patient-groupsdrug-makers-high-drug-prices/79001722/.