Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Genomic instability in cancer and aging Jan Vijg, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas DNA mutations AGC T CG Point mutation Transposition Deletion/Insertion Inversion Role of genome instability in aging Evolutionary logic of genome instability Evidence for genome deterioration in aging Association of DNA repair defects with accelerated aging ln mean fitness Effect of deleterious mutations on fitness in E. coli Number of mutations Elena & Lenski, 1997, Nature 390: 395 “The problem in this theory is that of developing a quantitative measure of mutations in somatic cells” Howard J. Curtis, 1963 LacZ plasmid recovery Spontaneous mutant frequencies with age in heart and small intestine Mutant frequency (x10-5) 40 Small Intestine Heart 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 Age (months) 25 30 35 Spontaneous mutant frequencies with age in mouse organs 30 -5 Mutant frequency (x10 ) small intestine 25 20 15 liver heart 10 spleen testis brain 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 Age (months) 25 30 35 Mutant spectra in vivo and in vitro 20 Mutant frequency (x10 -5 ) Point mutations 15 Rearrangements 10 5 0 E14 MEF SI SI He He Li Li Sp Sp Br Br (3m) (32m) (3m) (32m) (4m) (32m) (3m) (32m) (4m) (32m) Tissue (Age) Point mutational spectra in organs from Young (3m) and Old (32m) mice Brain 4 Heart 4 Liver 4 Spleen 4 Small intestine Mock recovery 70 4 60 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Percentage Mutant frequency (x10-5) Y 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lymphoma 4 4 4 4 70 4 60 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Percentage Mutant frequency (x10-5) O 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 G:C AT at CpG sites 0 0 0 0 Del (-1) at reiterated sites, i.e. a sequence of 3 or more of the same nucleotide Mutant frequency (x10 -5) Mutant frequencies in vivo and in vitro 10 5 0 E14 MEF Tissue Population Doublings MEF 6 25 20 15 10 Growth curve 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 20% 100 Days Mutant Frequency (x10 -5) 3% 50 40 30 Mutant frequency 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Mutant Frequency (x10 -5 ) Population Doublings 40 3%O2 Total MF 20%O2 30 20 spectra 10 0 4 20 3 9 Population Doublings 17 Point Mut Size change A: T in s +1 -1 N: N C: G de l > > 0 G :C 5 A 10 T: 15 A: T G :C G :C G :C A in s +1 -1 N: N C: G T: A: T de l > > > > +1 0 > 20 Mutant Frequency (x10 -5) in s -1 N: N Mutant Frequency (x10-5) 5 G :C +1 A C: G T: A: T de l > > > > 10 A: T in s -1 N: N A: T G :C G :C G :C 15 > A C: G T: A: T de l > > > > Mutant Frequency (x10 -5) 20 G :C A: T G :C G :C G :C Mutant Frequency (x10 -5) Point mutations in MEFs at high and low oxygen 20 15 10 5 0 20 15 10 5 0 Genome maintenance and aging Growth & Reproduction Increased Longevity Somatic Maintenance DNA Damage Apoptosis Cell Senescence Transcriptional Interference Aging Cancer Mutation Altered Chromatin Aging in DNA repair-deficient mice Mutant gene Defect Life span (weeks) Aging Phenotype Xpa KO Complete NER 100 None Ercc1 KO NER and crosslink repair 3-4 Weight reduction, renal and liver failure, cachexia, sarcopenia, kyphosis, neuronal degeneration Ercc1 HP Same 25 Same Ratio of Intensity Ratio of mRNA expression levels in old v/s young livers (normalized) 72 Arrays 6 Old, 6 Young Animals Total Intensity M = log2(red/green) A = 1/2 log2(red*green) Ratio of mRNA expression levels in Ercc1/- knockout v/s wildtype liver M = log2(red/green) A = 1/2 log2(red*green) Over-expressed genes* Under-expressed genes* Significant genes that Overlap with aging* *significant by SAM Annotation of genes co-expressed in aging and Ercc1 in liver Function Aging Ercc1 Immune Response Liver Regeneration Genotoxic Response Peroxisome Proliferators DNA Cross Linkers Oxidative Stress Mutation accumulation in liver of Ercc1 and Xpa mutant mice 24 weeks 52 weeks 5 4 Control 3 Xpa -/- 2 1 other del -1 A:T > N:N G:C > C:G G:C > T:A 0 G:C > A:T Mutant Frequency (x10-5) Point mutations in liver of 1-year old Xpa null mice other del -1 A:T > N:N G:C > C:G G:C > T:A G:C > A:T Mutant Frequency (x10-5) Point mutations in liver of 5mo Ercc1 null mice 5 4 Control 3 Ercc1-/- 2 1 0 Conclusions Different types of mutations accumulate with age in an organ-specific manner Liver-specific gene expression profile of mice with defects in the repair of double-strand lesions, i.e., Ercc1, is similar to normal aging DNA repair defects cause shifts in the spectrum of age-accumulating mutations Genome rearrangements appear to be associated more with aging than with cancer Acknowledgements Mutation Analysis Rita Busuttil Martijn Dollé Wendy Snyder Microarray Felix Calderon Debbie Muñoz Prakash Nair Bioinformatics Brent Calder John David Garza Paul Lohman Accelerated Genomics Mangkey Bounpheng Nathalie van Orsouw Erasmus University Jan Hoeijmakers Laura Niedernhofer Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Frederick Li Seoul National University Yousin Suh RIVM Harry van Steeg LBNL Judy Campisi