Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Silvia Borelli University of Ferrara » 3 priorities - The Europe 2020 strategy is about delivering growth that is: smart, through more effective investments in education, research and innovation; sustainable, thanks to a decisive move towards a lowcarbon economy; and inclusive, with a strong emphasis on job creation and poverty reduction. » 5 targets 1. Employment : 75% of the 20-64 year-olds to be employed 2. R&D : 3% of the EU's GDP to be invested in R&D 3. Climate change and energy sustainability : greenhouse gas emissions 20% (or even 30%, if the conditions are right) lower than 1990; 20% of energy from renewables ; 20% increase in energy efficiency 4. Education : Reducing the rates of early school leaving below 10%; at least 40% of 30-34–year-olds completing third level education 5. Fighting poverty and social exclusion : at least 20 million fewer people in or at risk of poverty and social exclusion » 7 Flagship Initiatives Digital agenda for Europe Innovation Union Youth on the move aims … to facilitate the entry of young people into the labour market Resource efficient Europe An industrial policy for the globalisation era An agenda for new skills and jobs aims to modernise labour markets and empower people by developing their skills and improving flexibility and security in the working environment; to help workers seek employment across the EU more easily in order to better match labour supply and demand. European platform against poverty aims to ensure social and territorial cohesion by helping the poor and socially excluded to get market and become active members of society. 23 Member States, including six outside the euroarea (Bulgaria, Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania), signed the Euro Plus Pact in March 2011. The Pact commits signatories to stronger economic coordination for competitiveness and convergence, also in areas of national competence, with concrete goals agreed on and reviewed on a yearly basis by Heads of State or Government. » “Six-Pack" Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area Regulation (EU) No 1174/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in the euro area Regulation (EU) No 1175/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances Council Regulation (EU) No 1177/2011 of 8 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States Six Pack Entered into force on 13 December 2011. It applies to 28 MS with some specific rules for euro-zone Member States. It strengthens the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), reinforcing both the preventive and the corrective arm of the Pact, i.e. the Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP). It introduces reverse qualified majority voting (RQMV) for most sanctions (RQMV implies that a recommendation or a proposal of the Commission is considered adopted in the Council unless a qualified majority of Member States votes against it). Reg. 1174 and 1176 set up the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance /macroeconomic_imbalance_procedure/index_en.htm Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure: » aims to identify imbalances in Member States’ economies much earlier than before. » monitors national economies in detail and alerts the EU institutions to potential problems ahead. » uses a scoreboard that tracks changes in 11 economic indicators, such as labour costs. » Each November, the Commission publishes the results in the Alert Mechanism Report. The report identifies Member States that require further analysis (an in-depth review), but does not draw any conclusions. » If the Commission concludes that excessive imbalances exist in a Member State (for example, wage rises that are not in line with productivity increases ), it may recommend to the Council that the Member State draw up a corrective action plan. This recommendation is adopted by the Council. » The Commission and Council monitor the Member State throughout the year to check whether the policies in the corrective action plan are being implemented. » if the Commission repeatedly concludes that a euro area Member State's corrective action plan is unsatisfactory, it can propose that the Council levy a fine of 0.1% of GDP a year. » Penalties can also be levied if Member States fail to take action based on the plan (starting with an interest-bearing deposit of 0.1% of GDP, which can be converted to a fine if there is repeated noncompliance). » The sanctions are approved unless a qualified majority of Member States overturn them. » The Monti Clause Art. 1 § 3 Reg. 1176/2011 - The application of this Regulation shall fully observe Article 152 TFEU, and the recommendations issued under this Regulation shall respect national practices and institutions for wage formation. This Regulation takes into account Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and accordingly does not affect the right to negotiate, conclude or enforce collective agreements or to take collective action in accordance with national law and practices. » Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance Entered into force on 1 January 2013. Intergovernmental agreement (no involvement of European Parliament) signed by 25 EU Member States (all but UK and Czech Republic). TSCG is binding for all euro-zone Member States, while other contracting parties will be bound once they adopt the euro or earlier if they wish. It requires contracting parties to respect/ensure convergence towards the country-specific medium-term objective (MTO), as defined in the SGP. Correction mechanisms should ensure automatic action to be undertaken in case of deviation from the MTO or the adjustment path towards it, with escape clauses for exceptional circumstances. These budget rules shall be implemented in national law through provisions of "binding force and permanent character, preferably constitutional“ (in Italy: L. Cost. 1/2012). European Court of Justice may impose financial sanction (0.1% of GDP – for Italy: 390 Million €) if a country does not properly implement the new budget rules in national law. The State shall balance revenue and expenditure in its budget, taking account of the adverse and favourable phases of the economic cycle. No recourse shall be made to borrowing except for the purpose of taking account of the effects of the economic cycle or, subject to authorisation by the two Houses approved by an absolute majority vote of their Members, in exceptional circumstances. » “Two-Pack" Entered into force on 30 May 2013 Regulation on common provisions for monitoring and assessing draft budgetary plans and ensuring the correction of excessive deficit of the Member States in the euro area. Regulation on the strengthening of economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability in the euro area. Applicable to euro-area Member States only. Euro-area Member States shall submit their draft budgetary plan for the following year to the Commission and the Eurogroup before 15 October. If the Commission assesses that the draft budgetary plan shows serious noncompliance with the SGP, the Commission can require a revised draft budgetary plan (in 2013, 5 MS has been recalled: Spain, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Finland). [According to the analysis based on the Commission Autumn 2013 Forecast, there is a risk that the Italian Draft Budgetary Plan will not allow reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio in line with the debt reduction benchmark in 2014.] » Member States in the Excessive Deficit Procedure must submit regular progress reports on how they are correcting their deficits. » The Commission can request more information or recommend further action from those at risk of missing their deficit deadlines. » Euro area Member States with excessive deficits must also submit Economic Partnership Programmes, which contain plans for detailed fiscal-structural reforms (for example, on pension systems or public healthcare) that will correct their deficits in a lasting way. The 2012 Fiscal Sustainability Report analyses the sustainability of public finances in the Member States, against the background of the impact of the financial, economic and fiscal crisis and the demographic ageing projected in the 2012 Ageing Report. For further information: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/i ndex_en.htm TOWARDS A GENUINE ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION Van Rompuy (President of the European Council) in close collaboration with: Barroso (President of the European Commission); Juncker (President of the Eurogroup); Draghi (President of the European Central Bank): http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/press data/en/ec/134069.pdf November The Annual Growth Survey (AGS) sets out overall economic priorities for the EU for the following year. The Alert Mechanism Report (AMR) screens Member States for economic imbalances. The Commission publishes its opinions on draft budget plans and Economic Partnership Programmes (for euro area countries with excessive budget deficits). The budget plans are also discussed by euro area finance ministers. December Euro area Member States adopt final annual budgets, taking into account the Commission's advice and finance ministers' opinions. February/March The European Parliament and relevant EU ministers (for employment, economics and finance, and competitiveness) meeting in the Council discuss the AGS. The Commission publishes its winter economic forecast. The European Council adopts economic priorities for the EU, based on the AGS. The Commission publishes in-depth reviews of Member States with potential imbalances (those identified in the AMR). April Member States submit their Stability/Convergence Programmes and their National Reform Programmes , which should be in line with all previous EU recommendations. Eurostat publishes verified debt and deficit data from the previous year, which is important to check if Member States are meeting their fiscal targets. May The Commission proposes country-specific recommendations (CSRs), tailored policy advice to Member States based on the priorities identified in the AGS and information from the plans received in April. In May, the Commission also publishes its spring economic forecast. June/July The European Council endorses the CSRs, and EU ministers meeting in the Council discuss them. EU finance ministers (ECOFIN) ultimately adopt them in July. October Euro area Member States submit draft budget plans for the following year to the Commission (by 15 October). If a plan is out of line with a Member State's medium-term targets, the Commission can ask it to be redrafted. » It starts the European Semester » The Annual Growth Survey (AGS), together with the Joint Employment Report and the Integrated Guidelines, provides the basis for guidance by the European Council to Member States on the comprehensive strategies to be set out in National Reform Programmes (NRPs) and Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs). » In 2014, 5 priorities has been established : I - Pursuing differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation II - Restoring bank lending to the economy 85% of German SMEs that applied for credit in the second half of 2012 received the full amount but the average for southern European countries was just over 40% and only 25% for Greece. Close monitoring of private debt levels and associated financial risks, such as real estate bubbles, and the impact of corporate and personal insolvency regimes, where necessary. This also includes schemes creating a tax bias towards debt financing. III - Promoting growth and competitiveness for today and tomorrow IV - Tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis Further reform efforts to ensure that wage developments should be in line with productivity and thus support both competitiveness and aggregate demand, to remedy labour market segmentation, notably by modernising employment protection legislation. V - Modernising public administration In 2013, for the first time, the JER includes a scoreboard of key employment and social indicators (see also Commission's Communication on strengthening the social dimension of the Economic and Monetary Union, COM(2013)690). The results of the scoreboard will be further analysed by the Commission in the preparation of Country-Specific Recommendations. The scoreboard contains five headline indicators: • unemployment • youth unemployment and the rate of those not in education, employment or training (NEET rate) • household disposable income • the at-risk-of-poverty rate • income inequalities North and core of EA: AT, BE, DE, FI, FR, LU, NL; South and periphery of EA: EE, EL, ES, IE, IT, CY, MT, PT, SI, SK; Non EA – North: CZ, DK, PL, SE, UK; Non EA - South and periphery: BG, HR, LV, LT, HU, RO. » «Many indicators are already utilised in the employment and social fields, but are powerless against the priority given to economic issues within the governance framework. What is needed is for these social indicators to be placed on an equal footing with the economic ones, in order to have a real impact on economic policies.” The EP deplores the fact that Parliament has been completely marginalised and regrets the fact that the economic adjustment programme measures in Greece (May 2010 and March 2012), Ireland (December 2010), Portugal (May 2011) and Cyprus (June 2013) were designed without any assessment of the consequences by means of impact studies or coordination with the Employment Committee, the Social Protection Committee, the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) or the Commissioner for Employment and Social Affairs; the consultative bodies established by Treaty, in particular the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and the Committee of the Regions (CoR), were not consulted. » Les indicateurs servent « à concevoir et définir les orientations de toute politique publique » » « légitimité par les résultats »: « Si les résultats, quantifiés, font apparaître que les objectifs sont atteints, l’action démontre son efficacité ». » Ce gouvernement par le nombre opère « une redistribution des savoirs et des pouvoirs » » Communication: Towards a job-rich recovery » Commission staff working document: Quality framework for traineeships (2012) » Commission staff working document on exploiting the employment potential of the personal and household services (2012) » Commission staff working document: Reforming EURES to meet the goals of Europe 2020 (2012) » Commission staff working document: Implementing the Youth Opportunities Initiative - First steps taken (2012) » Commission staff working document on labour market trends and challenges (2012) » Commission staff working document: Open, dynamic and inclusive labour markets (2012) » Commission staff working document: Exploiting the employment potential of ICTs (2012) » Commission staff working document on an action plan for the EU healthcare workforce (2012) » Commission staff working document: Exploiting the employment potential of green growth (2012) » 3 main axes: 1. Supporting job creation: Focus more on demandside (Exploit job creation in 3 new sectors: green economy, health & social services, ICT); Reduce tax on labour (but also reduce employer social security contributions); Tackle undeclared work; Modernise wage-setting systems to align wages with productivity developments. 2. Restoring dynamics of labour markets: Reform labour markets by encouraging companies' internal flexibility, and reducing the labour market segmentation between those in precarious employment and those on more stable employment; Invest in skills; Moving towards a European labour market. 3. Improving EU governance: Reinforcing coordination and multilateral surveillance in employment policy by publishing a benchmarking system with selected employment indicators together with the draft Joint employment report and developing a reform tracking device to keep track of progress implementing national reform programmes; Effectively involving the social partners in the European semester by setting up an EU tripartite format for monitoring and exchanging views on wage developments; strengthening the link between employment policies and relevant financial instruments. » Youth Employment Package includes: A recommendation on introducing a Youth Guarantee in each Member State to ensure that all young people up to age 25 receive a quality offer of a job, continued education, an apprenticeship or a traineeship within four months of leaving formal education or becoming unemployed – adopted by the Employment and Social Policy Council (EPSCO) in February 2013. Second-stage consultation of EU social partners on a quality framework for traineeships. The announcement of a European Alliance for Apprenticeships and ways to reduce obstacles to mobility for young people. A Youth Employment Initiative proposed by the 7-8 February 2013 European Council with a budget of €6 billion for the period 201420. Communication from the Commission: Towards Social Investment for Growth and Cohesion – including implementing the European Social Fund 2014-2020 (2013) Commission Recommendation: Investing in Children – breaking the cycle of disadvantage (2013) Staff working document: Evidence on Demographic and Social Trends – Social Policies' Contribution to Inclusion, Employment and the Economy (Part 1) (2013) Staff working document: Evidence on Demographic and Social Trends – Social Policies' Contribution to Inclusion, Employment and the Economy (Part 2) (2013) Staff working document: Follow-up on the implementation by the Member States of the 2008 European Commission recommendation on active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market -– Towards a social investment approach (2013) Staff working document: 3rd Biennial Report on Social Services of General Interest (2013) Staff working document: Long-term care in ageing societies – Challenges and policy options (2013) Staff working document: Confronting Homelessness in the European Union (2013) Staff working document: Investing in Health (2013) Staff working document: Social investment through the European Social Fund (2013) » It focuses on: Ensuring that social protection systems respond to people's needs at critical moments throughout their lives. Simplified and better targeted social policies, to provide adequate and sustainable social protection systems. Upgrading active inclusion strategies in the Member States. Affordable quality childcare and education, prevention of early school leaving, training and job-search assistance, housing support and accessible health care are all policy areas with a strong social investment dimension. The Macroeconomic Institute of the Hans Boeckler Foundation (IMK) has recently held a conference during which EU Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Laszlo Andor, delivered a keynote speech on how to address social imbalances in Europe and by doing so restarting the process of convergence. http://www.social-europe.eu/2014/02/addresssocial-imbalances-europe/ http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId =89&newsId=2023&furtherNews=yes Further information: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1044&langId=en&moreDo cuments=yes European Economic and Social Committee, Step up for a Stronger Europe. 30 Proposals for stepping-up Europe 2020: http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/step-up-for-astrongereurope---30-conclusions---eesc.pdf Caritas Europa Report, The Impact of European Crisis: http://www.caritas-europa.org/code/EN/inte.asp?Page=1505 EuroMemoGroup, L’Europa alternativa: http://www.sbilanciamoci.org/2013/03/euromemorandum-ci-salveraleuropa/