Download Media Release

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Heliosphere wikipedia , lookup

Exploration of Jupiter wikipedia , lookup

Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 wikipedia , lookup

Dwarf planet wikipedia , lookup

Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup

Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup

Jumping-Jupiter scenario wikipedia , lookup

Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
EMBARGOED—NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE BEFORE:
Monday, March 23, 2015
 3:00 PM US Eastern Daylight Time
 7:00 PM Greenwich Mean Time
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
 4:00 AM Japanese Standard Time
 6:00 AM Australian Eastern Time
The full PNAS embargo policy is available here:
http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/journalist.shtml
Jupiter migration in the early Solar System
Jupiter’s orbital migration in its early history may explain why the structure of the Solar
System differs from most extrasolar systems, according to a study. The Solar System, with
low-mass inner planets relatively far from the Sun, may be an anomaly compared with most
known extrasolar planetary systems, which feature large planets orbiting close to their star.
Konstantin Batygin and Greg Laughlin modeled planetary formation in the early Solar
System and found that inward migration of Jupiter from an orbit of more than 5 astronomical
units (AUs) to around 1.5 AUs, followed by outward orbital migration, may explain the low
mass of inner rocky planets. Inward migration of Jupiter may have entrained and
shepherded small planetary precursors, initiating a collisional cascade in the inner Solar
System. The aerodynamic evolution of the generated planetesimal swarm likely facilitated
orbital decay of preexisting planets and planetesimals close to the Sun, potentially explaining
the lack of large planets close to the star. The remaining volatile-poor, mass-depleted debris
would then have formed into the inner planets. The results suggest that stars that harbor
giant planets with orbital periods longer than 100 days may be unlikely to host multiple closein planets, and that Earth-sized close-in planets may be uninhabitable and enriched in
volatiles, according to the authors.
Article #14-23252: “Jupiter’s decisive role in the inner Solar System’s early evolution,” by
Konstantin Batygin and Greg Laughlin.
MEDIA CONTACT: Konstantin Batygin, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences,
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA; tel: 617-794-4302; e-mail:
<[email protected]>
http://www.eurekalert.org/jrnls/pnas/14-23252.htm
AFTER THIS ARTICLE PUBLISHES, it will be available at
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1423252112