Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Heliosphere wikipedia , lookup
Exploration of Jupiter wikipedia , lookup
Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 wikipedia , lookup
Dwarf planet wikipedia , lookup
Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Jumping-Jupiter scenario wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
EMBARGOED—NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE BEFORE: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:00 PM US Eastern Daylight Time 7:00 PM Greenwich Mean Time Tuesday, March 24, 2015 4:00 AM Japanese Standard Time 6:00 AM Australian Eastern Time The full PNAS embargo policy is available here: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/journalist.shtml Jupiter migration in the early Solar System Jupiter’s orbital migration in its early history may explain why the structure of the Solar System differs from most extrasolar systems, according to a study. The Solar System, with low-mass inner planets relatively far from the Sun, may be an anomaly compared with most known extrasolar planetary systems, which feature large planets orbiting close to their star. Konstantin Batygin and Greg Laughlin modeled planetary formation in the early Solar System and found that inward migration of Jupiter from an orbit of more than 5 astronomical units (AUs) to around 1.5 AUs, followed by outward orbital migration, may explain the low mass of inner rocky planets. Inward migration of Jupiter may have entrained and shepherded small planetary precursors, initiating a collisional cascade in the inner Solar System. The aerodynamic evolution of the generated planetesimal swarm likely facilitated orbital decay of preexisting planets and planetesimals close to the Sun, potentially explaining the lack of large planets close to the star. The remaining volatile-poor, mass-depleted debris would then have formed into the inner planets. The results suggest that stars that harbor giant planets with orbital periods longer than 100 days may be unlikely to host multiple closein planets, and that Earth-sized close-in planets may be uninhabitable and enriched in volatiles, according to the authors. Article #14-23252: “Jupiter’s decisive role in the inner Solar System’s early evolution,” by Konstantin Batygin and Greg Laughlin. MEDIA CONTACT: Konstantin Batygin, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA; tel: 617-794-4302; e-mail: <[email protected]> http://www.eurekalert.org/jrnls/pnas/14-23252.htm AFTER THIS ARTICLE PUBLISHES, it will be available at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1423252112