Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Meeting of the Lebanese Society of Rheumatology 6th of November 2009, Beyruth Diabetic foot infection Dr Aurélien DINH, MD Pr Louis BERNARD, MD, PhD Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Tours, France Corresponding author: [email protected] Definition • Infection is due – to tissue infestation – by micro organisms – with inflammatory response • Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is due to foot ulceration • Colonization should be distinguish from infection • Colonization is continuous on wound © Copyright SPILF No infection ! Infection ! Diagnosis • Diagnosis of infection is clinical (not bacteriological): – – – – – Induration Warmth Erythema Local tenderness Purulence discharge © Copyright SPILF • DFI involve soft tissue with or wthout bone tissue (osteitis) © Copyright SPILF Are all diabetics equal for foot infection ? • NO !! • Diabetic foot infection is mostly due to peripheral neuropathy • Mainly because of – deformation (neuroarhropathy) – insensitiveness Deformation © Copyright SPILF © Copyright SPILF Sensitive neuropathy © Copyright SPILF Peripheral neuropathy • Lack of protective sensation • Cracking skin >>Neuropathy is favourable to wound • Neuropathy delays diagnosis and treatment of wound • Neuropathy does’nt help to take care (no pain, no care) Physiopathology of DFI • Foot wound and infection are more frequent in diabetic population • Risks factors are subject to debate but : – – – – – – – – Deficit of cellular mechanism of defense (hyperglycemia) Peripheral neuropathy Hyperpressure No off-loading Chronicity of wound Hypoxy Vascular disease Anatomic deformation Predictive factors of outcome • Peripheral vascular disease – restrict debridment – Reduce antibiotic efficacy – Encourage gangrene • No off-loading – Encourage by insensitivity to pain – Refrain from wound healing – Encourage infection and osteitis Clinical classification (staging in DFI) • UT (University of Texas) Classification – Easy to use, based on : depth of wound/ infection/ vascular disease • IWGDF-IDSA classification (International working group on the diabetic foot classification) focus on infection stage • Others classifications : Wagner, Lipsky, PEDIS UT Classification Wound prevalence by grade and stage Prevalence of amputation within each wound category IDSA-IWGDF classification Lavery, CID 2007 How to collect specimens for microbiological diagnosis ? • Bacteriological samples : – should be performed • Only in case of clinical infection • Before antibiotic therapy – Several methods exists How to get reliable microbiological data ? • How to get bacteriological specimens ? • There is no consensus to distinguish the best method • Local protocols should be done by clinicians and microbiologists • They should specify: objective of analysis, method of taking specimens, transport, culture… • The goal is to identify micro organisms involve in bacterial invasion and to avoid colonization General principles • Wound should be cleanse and debride before obtaining specimens for culture • Samples should – be clearly identified – and promtly send to laboratory Microbiological evaluation • Generally : blood cultures or cultures of deep tissue biopsy specimen>>more clinically significant • Superficial swab: easy to perform, not invasive • Scraping with a curette • Needle Aspiration • Soft tissue biopsy • Bone biopsy (osteomyelitis) Superficial swab Needle aspiration Soft tissue biopsy Bone biopsy Microbiological correlation between superficial sample and deep tissue biopsy (from E. Senneville) 62 65 69 30 68 ??? 24 Sapico 1984, Lavery 1995, Slater 2004, Kessler 2006, Senneville 2006 Microbiological correlation (between kind of wound and germs involved) Lipsky CID 2004 Bone biopsy • Gold-standard test for diagnosis osteo myelitis (histological analysis should be performed) • Usefulness reliably recovering the pathogens responsible for bone infection • It should be performed passing through a clean zone Concordance between superficial swabs and bone biopsy Senneville CID 2006 Recommanded wash out period before bone biopsy : +15 days 7 pénicilline céfalotine netilmycine clindamycine ciprofloxacine rifampicine 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 5 9 13 17 21 Witso et al. Acta Orthop Scand, 1999 Bone biopsy Which relevance for other laboratory investigations ? • Limited interest • No biological markers can help to make difference between infection and colonization • Kinetic of the value of C Reactive protein could be interesting to estimate response to treatment Assess risk factors • Mechanical factors • Vascular factors – – – – – Clinical data Systolic index pressure Doppler Transcutaneous oxygen pressure others © Copyright Pr Louis BERNARD DFI management • Multidiscplinary team • Management – – – – – – Strict glycemic control Strict off-loading Medical debridment Wound care plan Edema controll Tetanos vacinal status Glycemia/off loading • Glycemia – should be strictly controlled: • close monitoring, • insulinotherapy • Off loading : – The major factor !! – It should be total and continuous Atherosclerosis/Debridment • Seek for vascular disease to correct • Mechanical debridment to clean tissue – Physically excise dead and unhealthy tissues – Reduces bacterial burden – Removes reservoir of potential pathogens >> help to heal Local therapy • Local antiseptic : – No Proof of effectiveness !! • Local antibiotherapy : – No Proof of effectiveness !! Wound care • Wound dressing – should be performed daily, – no adhesive or occlusive devices • But there is: – No good trials – No consensus – No study cost/effectiveness Others • Tetanos vaccine status : YES • Hyperbaric oxygenia : no proof of effectiveness • Growth factors: no proof of effectiveness Antibiotherapy • Indication: when there is infection and after microbiological sample performed • Empirical antibiotic regimen: – – – – – – Effective against staphylococcus aureus Decrease with bacteriological results Depending on severity of infection Depending of diagnosis of osteitis Mostly parenteral at the beginning With good biodisponibility and penetration Complex choice of antibiotherapy • • • • • • • Bacterial spectra >> effective on Staphylococcus Biodisponibility >> intra veinous ? Penetration >> high dose ? Tolerance >> visceral failure Interaction Bitherapy >> to prevent resistance High dose >> because of atherosclerosis Treatment duration Lipsky, CID 2004 Surgical strategies • Vascular surgery – by pass – Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty • Orthopedic surgery – To control infection – To attempt to salvage limb Vascular surgery (1) • Vascular disease exacerbate infection>> revascularization • Revascularisation can be realise – to save the limb – or to help healing Vascular surgery (2) • In case of critical ischemia – revascularization should be perform when sepsis is controlled – In case of emergency: revascularization should be performed close or at the same time • When ischemia is less critical: revascularization should always be discussed Before After Benefit of revascularization (1) Jacqueminet Diabetes care 2005 Benefit of revascularization (2) Jacqueminet Diabetes care 2005 Methods for local treatment • • • • Most important !! Excision of infected tissues Limited debridment of necrotic tissues Drainage of deep abscess and deep space infection • In some cases : amputation = the only option • Surgery should attempt to preserve the integrity of walking surface Indications for surgery • Urgent surgical consultation: – Fasciitis and necrosis – Gangrene/abscess • Delay surgery : – cellulitis not responding after 3 days of efficient antibiotic therapy • Indications for amputation: – If vascular disease: state on vascularization possible procedure – If non vascular disease: if extensive soft tissue lost or fasciitis with life or limb-threatening infection Osteitis in DFI • • • • When think about it ? Which imagery ? Surgery management Which antibiotic therapy ? Physical examination • No healing despite appropriate care • Positive probe to bone test – (PPV:50-89% ; NPV>95%) • Sausage deformity Accuracy of probe to bone test Lavery Diabete care 2007 Ulcers not healing CRP and osteitis Enderle et al. Diabetes Care 1999 Radiological diagnosis of osteitis (1) Dinh MT CID 2008 Radiological diagnosis of osteitis (2) Kapoor et al. Arch Int Med 2007 Radiological diagnosis of osteitis (3) Termaat JBJS 2008 Surgery for osteitis • Conservative surgery – Limited resection – No osteo synthesis – Antibiotherapy from 4 to 6 weeks (parenteral then oral) • Different from acute Charcot foot Hartemann-heurtier, Senneville, Diabetes metabolism 2008 Microbiology in osteitis of DFI Hartemann-heurtier, Senneville, Diabetes metabolism 2008 Antibiotic treatment for osteitis in DFI Hartemann-heurtier, Senneville, Diabetes metabolism 2008 Preventive actions • Education: – risks of neuropathy and vascular disease, self management and examination • Pedicure: – nails care, managing hyperkeratosis • Shoes: – should fit, trauma due to shoes are the first cause of diabetic ulcers • Preventive surgery: – if major deformation to avoid futur hyperpressure Take home messages • Diabetic foot ulcers are – Coming on insensitive foot – Always colonized – Infection diagnosis is clinical – Outcome depending mostly on atherosclerosis and tipping off • Management need – Precise wound care – Assess risks factors – Microbiological specimens – Antibiotherapy – Surgery some times Thank you for your attention ! • Thanks to – french infectious disease society, – french society of vascular surgery, – french society of microbiology • Pr Agnès Hartmann-Heurtier (Endocrinology, Pitié Salpétrière) • Dr Eric Senneville (Infectious disease, Lille)