Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63 (2007) 533 – 538 Short communication Is health-related quality of life an independent predictor of survival in patients with chronic heart failure?☆ Hermann Faller a,⁎, Stefan Störk b , Marion Schowalter a , Thomas Steinbüchel a , Verena Wollner b , Georg Ertl b , Christiane E. Angermann b a Institute of Psychotherapy and Medical Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany Department of Internal Medicine I, Center of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany b Received 11 January 2007; received in revised form 4 June 2007; accepted 19 June 2007 Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to examine whether the physical and mental components of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are independent predictors of survival in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods: A cohort of 231 outpatients with CHF was followed prospectively for 986 days (median; interquartile range=664–1120). Generic HRQoL was measured with the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), disease-specific HRQoL was measured with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, and depression was measured with the selfreported Patient Health Questionnaire. Results: Both generic and disease-specific HRQoL were predictive of survival on univariate analyses. After adjustment for prognostic factors such as age, gender, degree of left ventricular dysfunction, and functional status, only the mental health component of SF-36 and the disease-specific HRQoL remained significant. When depression was included, both measures also lost their predictive power. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the prognostic value of patients' HRQoL reflects confounding with the severity of disease and comorbid depression. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Chronic heart failure; Depression; Health-related quality of life; Prognosis; Survival Introduction Chronic heart failure (CHF) is associated with a high mortality risk [1] and severely compromises patients' healthrelated quality of life (HRQoL) [2,3]. Conflicting evidence exists as to whether HRQoL has, in itself, prognostic power on the prediction of mortality risk. Some [4–8], but not all [9], studies have found that self-reported HRQoL independently predicted poorer survival in patients with heart failure. Thus, the question on whether patients' subjective health perceptions capture additional prognostic information beyond the information gained from more ☆ There are no conflicts of interest. ⁎ Corresponding author. Institute of Psychotherapy and Medical Psychology, University of Würzburg, D-97070 Würzburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 931 312713; fax: +49 931 316080. E-mail address: [email protected] (H. Faller). 0022-3999/07/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.026 objective indicators of disease severity, such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and degree of physician-rated disease severity, remains unresolved. Moreover, patients' HRQoL is associated with depression [10], and depression has also been found to predict survival [11–13]. Thus, the prognostic value of patient-reported HRQoL may, at least in part, reflect confounding by depression. If this were the case, the predictive power of HRQoL should be diminished or even lost after adjustment for depression. The current prospective cohort study compares the relative prognostic value of HRQoL, quantitative assessments of left ventricular function, degree of physician-rated disease severity, and depression in CHF patients. We sought to clarify the following questions: (a) Is HRQoL predictive of reduced survival in patients with CHF after adjusting for established important biomedical variables known to affect survival? (b) If so, does this association hold after including depression as an additional covariate? 534 H. Faller et al. / Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63 (2007) 533–538 participate in voluntary psychometric assessment. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Würzburg (Würzburg, Germany). All subjects provided written informed consent. The diagnosis of CHF was confirmed by clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic criteria. Left ventricular dimensions and fractional shortening were measured by M-mode echocardiography, and diastolic filling characteristics were assessed by Doppler techniques. Patients were eligible to participate in the INH if they had CHF with either impaired left ventricular systolic function (fractional shortening, b24%) or preserved left ventricular function (left ventricular fractional shortening, ≥24%), with abnormal diastolic filling characteristics on Doppler echocardiography, in addition to typical signs and symptoms of CHF (at least one of the following: raised jugular venous pressure, peripheral edema, third heart sound, and pulmonary congestion at clinical examination or chest X-ray). Patients' generic HRQoL was measured using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) [14]. The SF-36 is a widely used international standardized tool that contains eight subscales (physical function, role—physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, role—emotional, social function, and mental health), as well as two summary scales (physical health, Subscales 1–4; mental health, Subscales 5–8). Scores may range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL. Due to restrictive prescriptions for the handling of missing data when computing for SF-36 physical health and mental health summary scales, the sample size for analyses covering the SF-36 scales was considerably reduced (n=192). Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the study participants (n=231) Age (years) [mean (S.D.)] Female gender (%) NYHA functional class (%) I/II III/IV Ischemic etiology of heart failure (%) Ejection fraction (%) [mean (S.D.)] Comorbidities/risk factors (%) Obesity a Hypercholesterolemia b Diabetes Hypertension c Renal dysfunction Medication (%) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor Aldosterone antagonist Diuretic Beta blocker 64 (13) 29.4 25.3/44.1 24.9/5.7 42.8 44 (15) 40.2 60.3 29.3 57.6 12.4 71.2 28.8 79.5 68.6 P values refer to chi-square test and Student's t test, as appropriate. a b c Body mass index N30 kg/m2. Total cholesterol N200 mg/dl or on lipid-lowering drugs. Blood pressure N140/90 mmHg or on antihypertensive drugs. Method Between June 2002 and December 2003, the prospective cohort study “Interdisciplinary Network for Heart Failure” (INH) Würzburg consecutively recruited all patients presenting with CHF of any etiology and severity at two Würzburg University medical centers (N=1054). The present subsample (n=231; participation rate=22%) includes subjects who gave written informed consent to Table 2 HRQoL in the total cohort and in subgroups, by severity of depression Total sample (n=231) SF-36 Physical function Role—physical Bodily pain General health Vitality Social function Role—emotional Mental health PCS MCS KCCQ Physical limitation Symptoms Self-efficacy Quality of life Social limitation Functional status Clinical summary score No depression (n=162) Minor depression (n=38) Major depression (n=31) Mean S.D. Range Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. P 47.4 28.8 62.2 43.8 42.5 67.2 48.0 60.6 36.1 44.3 28.3 41.0 29.6 16.9 22.0 27.5 46.7 19.9 10.6 11.5 0–100 0–100 0–100 5–97 0–100 0–100 0–100 16.0–100 10.5–61.0 21.1–66.7 53.7 37.6 68.2 47.2 50.6 74.6 58.7 66.9 38.1 48.0 27.0 43.7 27.8 16.8 19.6 24.9 45.3 17.7 10.5 9.7 37.9 6.9 52.6 39.4 26.6 53.6 30.6 49.7 32.5 37.7 27.0 21.2 28.8 14.2 16.0 21.1 43.9 17.3 9.6 11.0 26.6 10.7 42.9 30.8 21.1 45.0 15.5 42.0 29.8 32.9 23.4 27.6 28.8 13.3 13.1 30.2 35.7 16.4 8.8 9.6 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 63.3 68.5 71.3 56.6 58.3 66.1 61.8 24.0 24.6 22.4 25.7 27.6 22.1 21.7 6.3–100 0–100 0–100 0–100 4.2–100 2.8–100 2.8–100 68.6 75.9 74.8 64.7 65.1 72.5 68.7 22.4 21.6 20.9 23.4 25.1 19.6 19.2 51.4 55.7 61.8 41.9 42.1 54.4 47.9 20.9 22.4 25.5 20.1 23.2 20.0 16.8 50.6 45.9 64.9 32.8 42.2 47.8 42.6 26.1 22.0 21.8 20.2 30.4 21.6 20.1 b.001 b.001 .001 b.001 b.001 b.001 b.001 P values are derived from the comparison of patients with no depression versus patients with minor depression versus patients with major depression (ANOVA). H. Faller et al. / Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63 (2007) 533–538 535 Fig. 1. Quality of life scores (mean values), by NYHA functional class. All differences between NYHA functional classes are significant at Pb.001 [analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score. screening instruments when evaluated against the Structured Clinical Interview for the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [18] or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition as reference standard [19]. The outcome variable was time from study entry to allcause death. Follow-up assessment of patient survival was performed in October 2005 at a median follow-up time of 986 days (interquartile range=664–1120). No patient was lost to follow-up. Kaplan–Meier probabilities of survival were computed. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the relationship between HRQoL and survival. First, the SF-36 physical health component score (PCS) and mental health component score (MCS), as well as the KCCQ clinical summary score, were analyzed individually for their predictive value on univariate analyses, respectively. Second, in multivariable models, biomedical predictor variables [age, gender, LVEF, and New York Heart Patients' disease-specific HRQoL was assessed using the self-reported Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). This newly developed tool was designed for patients with CHF and has demonstrated very good reliability and validity coefficients for both the original US version [15] and the German version [16]. It covers the following domains: physical function, symptoms (frequency and severity), self-efficacy, quality of life (psychological well-being), and social limitation. A clinical summary scale integrating all subscales, with the exception of self-efficacy, is also available. Scores may range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status. Depression was measured using the German version of the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module PHQ-9 [17–19]. This nine-item self-report screening tool allows for the probable diagnosis of a current episode of major or minor depression using its categorical algorithm. The PHQ-9 diagnosis of depression compared favorably to other Table 3 Cox proportional hazards regression with survival as dependent variable and HRQoL indicators as predictors, with and without adjustment for other prognostic factors (n=231) SF-36 PCS P Univariate analysis HRQoL measure b.001 Multivariate analysis (Model A) HRQoL measure .19 Age .27 Gender .24 LVEF .14 NYHA functional class b.001 Multivariate analysis (Model B) HRQoL measure .29 Age .18 Gender .30 LVEF .17 NYHA functional class b.001 Major depression .14 Minor depression .86 SF-36 MCS HR 95% CI 0.93 0.90–0.96 0.98 1.02 1.50 0.99 3.00 0.98 1.02 1.44 0.99 2.88 1.77 0.93 P KCCQ clinical summary score HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI .009 0.97 0.94–0.99 b.001 0.97 0.96–0.98 0.94–1.01 0.99–1.06 0.76–2.97 0.97–1.01 1.98–4.56 .04 .14 .45 .04 b.001 0.97 1.02 1.29 0.98 3.11 0.94–1.00 0.99–1.06 0.67–2.47 0.96–1.00 2.11–4.57 .049 .012 .33 .13 b.001 0.99 1.03 1.33 0.99 2.66 0.97–1.00 1.01–1.06 0.75–2.36 0.97–1.00 1.81–3.91 0.95–1.02 0.99–1.06 0.72–2.85 0.97–1.01 1.89–4.38 0.83–3.77 0.39–2.21 .15 .13 .46 .07 b.001 .37 .81 0.98 1.03 1.28 0.98 3.04 1.45 0.90 0.95–1.01 0.99–1.06 0.66–2.48 0.96–1.00 2.04–4.52 0.64–3.34 0.38–2.13 .16 .007 .36 .15 b.001 .14 .60 0.99 1.04 1.31 0.99 2.67 1.71 0.81 0.97–1.01 1.01–1.07 0.74–2.34 0.97–1.01 1.81–3.92 0.84–3.48 0.38–1.74 Model A: adjusted for age, gender, ejection fraction, and NYHA functional class. Model B: Model A, with additional adjustment for depression (major depression vs. no depression; minor depression vs. no depression). 536 H. Faller et al. / Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63 (2007) 533–538 Association (NYHA) functional class] were added to the respective HRQoL scales. Thus, in the second models, we tested HRQoL against indicators of disease severity. Third, depression was additionally controlled for by also including depression in the multivariable models. HRQoL variables were included as continuous variables. The assumption of proportional hazards was checked by plotting log-minus-log functions. Pb.05 (two sided) was considered significant. SPSS 14.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used. Results KCCQ clinical summary score remained significant (Table 3, middle panel, Model A). The SF-36 PCS, however, lost its predictive power after adjusting for the abovementioned prognostic factors. To further clarify this issue, we included a measure of depression (PHQ-9) in the analyses. On univariate analysis, major depression, as compared to no depression, had proven predictive of shorter survival (HR=3.3; 95% CI=1.8–6.1; Pb.001). After the inclusion of major depression as an additional covariate, the SF-36 MCS also lost its predictive value (Table 3, bottom panel, Model B). Thus, the mental health component of HRQoL appears to reflect, at least in part, patients' comorbid depression. Descriptive statistics The descriptive statistics of the study cohort are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 64 years (S.D.=13); 71% were male and 73% were married. CHF etiologies were as follows: coronary heart disease, 43%; dilated cardiomyopathy, 22%; hypertension, 14%; other diseases, in 21%. One hundred twenty-one (52%) patients suffered from systolic heart failure (mean ejection fraction=33.0%), and 108 (47%) suffered from nonsystolic heart failure (mean ejection fraction=56.5%). The distribution of NYHA Functional Classes I/II/III/IV was 25%/44%/25%/6%. The median time since the diagnosis of CHF was 42 months (interquartile range=6–90). The distribution of HRQoL measures in our sample of CHF outpatients is given in Table 2. Compared to low levels of the SF-36 physical health and mental health summary scores, the KCCQ clinical summary scale covers a broader range of scores (Fig. 1). According to the PHQ-9, 31 (13%) patients suffered from probable major depression and 38 (17%) suffered from minor depression at the time of study inclusion. HRQoL was significantly and substantially reduced across all dimensions in patients with either major or minor depression compared to those without depression (Table 2). Survival analysis At the time of follow-up, 59 (26%) patients had died. The results of the univariate analyses for both generic and disease-specific HRQoL indicators are presented in Table 3 (top panel). The SF-36 PCS and MCS, as well as the KCCQ clinical summary score, were predictive of survival. To convey an idea of the magnitude of the effect, we graded the KCCQ clinical summary score by 10-point categories, since 10-point steps are deemed to be clinically significant. As the univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 1.40 [95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.24–1.59; Pb.001] shows, a 10-point decrease in the KCCQ clinical summary score confers an increase of approximately 40% in mortality. After entering age, gender, LVEF, and NYHA functional class in the regression model, both the SF-36 MCS and the Discussion The aim of our study was to clarify the prognostic value of patient-reported HRQoL. Both generic (SF-36) and disease-specific (KCCQ) measures of HRQoL were predictive of survival on univariate analyses, consistent with previous research [4–9]. After adjustment for established prognostic factors indicative of disease severity and mortality risk, such as age, left ventricular dysfunction, and NYHA functional class, however, only the mental component of generic HRQoL and the disease-specific measure remained predictive, whereas the physical component lost its prognostic power. This result is consistent with previous research showing that the KCCQ summary score remained predictive of survival even after controlling for NYHA functional class [7]. Another study found that the KCCQ was predictive of a combined endpoint of death or hospitalization after adjusting for numerous clinical prognostic factors, albeit not NYHA functional class [20]. We therefore conclude that the prognostic value of the physical component of generic HRQoL demonstrated on univariate analysis may result from confounding with disease severity captured particularly by NYHA functional class status. This conclusion is, however, somewhat limited by the subjective nature of the NYHA functional class ratings. Patients' subjective perceptions of their functional state, although assessed by attending physicians, may have influenced their physicians' judgements. As a consequence, including NYHA functional class in the model might have led to an overcorrection that unduly suppressed the effects of the HRQoL measures. Thus, although ratings by physicians and patients may well consider different aspects of the impact of heart failure on daily living [21,22], NYHA functional class ratings by physicians are likely to more reliably reflect disease-related physical functioning rather than the degree of left ventricular dysfunction. While the generic SF-36 component scores were far below normal in our sample [3], the disease-specific KCCQ summary scores were more widely distributed across the possible range of the scale. This reflects better differentiation of the KCCQ between subgroups according to measures of H. Faller et al. / Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63 (2007) 533–538 the clinical severity of CHF such as NYHA functional class [17]. After the inclusion of depression as an additional covariate, the mental component of generic HRQoL, as well as the disease-specific HRQoL measure, was no longer significant. This indicates confounding by comorbid depression, as shown by the strong effect of depression on HRQoL. Another way of interpreting these results is that depression may mediate the influence of HRQoL on survival. As both depression and HRQoL were measured at the same time point, this issue cannot be further resolved. However, regarding the possibly bidirectional association between depression and HRQoL, several pathways may be considered. Lower HRQoL scores may reflect a more severe burden of disease, which, in itself, may contribute to the development of depression. Conversely, depressed patients are likely to experience more pronounced functional impairment, which may result in higher NYHA functional class ratings. Furthermore, both depression and burden of disease may result from interrelated biological mechanisms such as proinflammatory cytokine secretion [23] or common genetic vulnerability [24]. Limitations Certain limitations need to be considered in the interpretation of the present findings. We investigated a heterogeneous cohort of patients with CHF across all NYHA functional classes with preserved, as well as reduced, ejection fraction. Considering the number of events and the relatively small sample size of this investigation, we refrained from more detailed analyses of confounders. A further limitation is that self-reports of depression were not confirmed by a structured interview. However, excellent sensitivity (98%) and specificity (80%) of the PHQ-9, in particular regarding major depression, have been well established [19]. It should be noted that the 95% CIs of the HRQoL predictor variables barely crossed the 1.0 value after adjustment for NYHA functional class and depression, respectively. The finding that these parameters thus lost their predictive value may be a consequence of insufficient power. Conclusion While patients' self-reported HRQoL is predictive of survival on univariate analysis, it may lose part of its predictive value when either more objective and physicianbased measures of disease severity and left ventricular functional impairment or measures of depression are taken into account. However, these results will have to be corroborated by larger studies. Nevertheless, it is important to evaluate patients' HRQoL not only to identify patients with increased mortality risk but also to assess the effectiveness of treatment and to monitor the course of the 537 disease, as these measures are easily obtained. Finally, our results confirm the findings of other authors that depression is a prognostic factor in the mortality of patients with CHF [11–13]. As presented elsewhere, we found that major depression was associated with a doubled mortality risk even after adjustment for important prognostic factors, such as age, gender, etiology, type and degree of left ventricular dysfunction, and functional status [25]. Although we tested the predictive power of HRQoL and major depression beyond that accounted for by established prognostic factors, the observational design of our study precludes any causal interpretation. Acknowledgments This study was supported, in part, by the Ernst and Berta Grimmke Foundation (Düsseldorf, Germany) and by an educational grant from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). References [1] Stewart S, MacIntyre K, Hole DJ, Capewell S, McMurray JVV. More “malignant” than cancer? Five-year survival following a first admission for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2001;3:315–22. [2] Juenger J, Schellberg D, Kraemer S, Haunstetter A, Zugck C, Herzog W, Haass M. Health related quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison with other chronic diseases and relation to functional variables. Heart 2002;87:235–41. [3] Hobbs FD, Kenkre JE, Roalfe AK, Davis RC, Hare R, Davies MK. Impact of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction on quality of life: a cross-sectional study comparing common chronic cardiac and medical disorders and a representative adult population. Eur J Heart Fail 2002;23:1867–76. [4] Bouvy M, Heerdink E, Leufkens H, Hoes A. Predicting mortality in patients with heart failure: a pragmatic approach. Heart 2006;89: 605–9. [5] Kostam V, Salem D, Pouleur H, Kostis J, Gorkin L, Shumaker S, Mottard I, Woods P, Konstam M, Yusuf S, for the SOLVD Investigators. Baseline quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization in 5,025 patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:890–5. [6] Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Guallar-Castillon P, Pascual C, Otero C, Montes A, Garcia A, Conthe P, Chiva M, Banegas J, Herrera M. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of hospital readmission and death among patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1274–9. [7] Soto G, Jones P, Weintraub W, Krumholz H, Spertus J. Prognostic value of health status in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;110:546–51. [8] Alla F, Briancon S, Guillemin F, Juilliere Y, Mertes P-M, Villemot J-P, Zannad F, for the EPICAL Investigators. Self-rating of quality of life provides additional prognostic information in heart failure. Insights into the EPICAL study. Eur J Heart Fail 2002;4:337–43. [9] Murberg TA, Furze G. Depressive symptoms and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure: a six-year follow-up study. Med Sci Monit 2004;10:643–8. [10] Rumsfeld JS, Havranek E, Msoudi FA, Peterson ED, Jones P, Tooley JF, Krumholz HM, Spertus JA, for the Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium. Depressive symptoms are the strongest predictors of short-term declines in health status in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1811–7. [11] Faris R, Purcell H, Henein MY, Coats AJS. Clinical depression is common and significantly associated with reduced survival in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2002;4:541–51. 538 H. Faller et al. / Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63 (2007) 533–538 [12] Jiang W, Kuchibhatla M, Cuffe MS, Christopher EJ, Alexander JD, Clary GL, Blazing MA, Gaulden LH, Califf RM, Krishnan RR, O'Connor CM. Prognostic value of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 2004;110:3452–6. [13] Jünger J, Schellberg D, Müller-Tasch T, Raupp G, Zugck C, Haunstetter A, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Haass M. Depression increasingly predicts mortality in the course of congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:261–7. [14] Ware JE. The SF-36 Health Survey. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia, PA: Raven, 1996. pp. 337–46. [15] Green PC, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;55: 1245–55. [16] Faller H, Steinbüchel S, Schowalter M, Störk S, Angermann C. Der Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)—ein neues krankheitsspezifisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität bei chronischer Herzinsuffizienz. Psychometrische Prüfung der deutschen Version. Psychother Psych Med 2005;55:200–8. [17] Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13. [18] Löwe B, Gräfe K, Zipfel S, Witte S, Loerch B, Herzog W. Diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes: superior criterion validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire. Psychother Psychosom 2004;73: 386–90. [19] Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Gräfe K, Kroenke K, Quenter A, Zipfel S, Buchholz C, Witte S, Herzog W. Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses. J Affect Disord 2004;87:131–40. [20] Heidenreich PA, Spertus JA, Jones PG, Weintraub WS, Rumsfeld JS, Rathore SS, Peterson ED, Masoudi FA, Krumholz HM, Havranek EP, Conard MW, Williams RE, for the Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium. Health status identifies heart failure outpatients at risk for hospitalization or death. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:726–52. [21] Dunderdale K, Thompson DR, Miles JNV, Beer SF, Furze G. Qualityof-life measurement in chronic heart failure: do we take account of the patient perspective? Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:572–82. [22] Paul S, Sneed N. Patient perceptions of quality of life and treatment in an outpatient congestive heart failure clinic. Congest Heart Fail 2001;8: 74–9. [23] Grippo AJ, Johnson AK. Biological mechanisms in the relationship between depression and heart disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2002; 26:941–62. [24] McGaffery J, Frasure-Smith N, Dubé M-P, Théroux P, Rouleau G, Duan Q, Lespérance F. Common genetic vulnerability to depressive symptoms and coronary artery disease: a review and development of candidate genes related to inflammation and serotonin. Psychosom Med 2006;68:187–200. [25] Faller H, Störk S, Schowalter M, Steinbüchel T, Wollner V, Ertl G, Angermann CE. Depression and survival in chronic heart failure: does gender play a role? Eur J Heart Fail 2007;9:1018–23.