Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Germline polymorphisms in the CD44 gene are associated with clinical outcome in localized gastric adenocarcinoma. Thomas Winder, M.D. University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center USC Keck School of Medicine Sharon A. Carpenter Laboratory Los Angeles, CA Background • Gastric Cancer is the 4th most common cancer type worldwide – 21.130 newly diagnosed patients in the US in 2009 • 2nd cause of cancer death worldwide – 10.620 deaths in the US in 2009 • Prognosis depends on: – Stage – Pathological differentiation National Cancer institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/stomach Genetic alterations in gastric cancer Diffuse type Intestinal type Normal gastric mucosa MSI-H (0-6%) E-cadherin mutation (41-45%) MSI-H (13-20%) Metaplasia Telomerase activation/ TERT expression p53 mutation (25-63%) p53 mutation (0-33%) (Adenoma) APC mutation (40-60%) Bcl-3 loss (43%) CD44 Cyclin E overexpression (10 %) CDC25B overexpression N-cadherin overexpression (43%) Twist 1 overexpression (39%) c-met amplification (19%) Early cancer Carcinoma K-sam amplification (33%) Cyclin E overexpression (14-20%) 18q (DCC) loss (50%) ß-Catenin mutation (27%) C-erbB2 amplification (20%) CD44 E-cadherin reduction (60%) SIP1 overexpression (55%) c-met amplification (39%) Reduced nm23 (˂52%) K-ras mutation (10%) Reduced p27 expression Metastasis Reduced nm23 (52%) Adapted from Keller et al. 2005 Expert Rev in Mol Medicine 7;17 CD44 - Background • CD44 is a glycoprotein encoded on the short arm of chromosome 11. • CD44 was first isolated in haemopoietic cells and has since been found on a wide range of tissues (e.g. gastric, lung, liver, pancreas) • The main ligands of CD44 are hyaluronan and osteopontin. • The protein isoforms are encoded by a single gene by alternative splicing and posttranslational modification. CD44 and its function • Cellular adhesion (transmembrane link between extracellular matrix and cytoskeleton) • CD44 positive cells are tumor initiating cells in gastric cancer • Immune System (e.g. lymphocyte homeing, T cell activation) • High CD44 protein expression has been associated with poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma* *Ghaffarzadehgan K et al. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14(41):6376-6381 CD44 gene structure Cell membrane CD44 Receptor TM Cyto 3´UTR Extracellular domain 1 2 3 4 5 5´ s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 16 17 18 19 20 s6 s7 s8 CD44 gene structure 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 v1 v2 v3 v4 v5 v6 v7 v8 v9 v10 s9 s10 3´ CD44 - pathways Hyaluronan, Osteopontin Feedback loop CD44 Hsp90/ pY cdc37 ErbB2 Grb2 Vav2 pY PI3-kinase Gab-1 PTEN Ras PDK1 Raf-1 Akt MEK Erk Cell survival Anti-apoptosis Gene transcription Cell-cycle progression Proliferation Invasion Drug resistance CD44 and cellular adhesion Hyaluronan, Osteopontin CD44 Ezrin Radixin Moesin Filamentous actin network Migration Cell motility CD44 gastric stem cell marker • Property of self-renewal, longevity and multipotency. • High CD44 protein-expression correlates with the presence of dysplasia in murine and human gastric cancer. • CD44 overexpression is associated with chemo- and radio-resistance Takaishi S et al. Stem Cells 2009:27:106-1020 Al-Hajj M et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2003;100:3983-3988 Location of gastric stem cells Gastric stem cells has been localized to the isthmus. Migrate bidirectionally to differentiate into gastric surface mucus cells that coat the • Gastric pits • Gastric parietal and • Zymogenic cells Quante M et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;6(12):724-37 CD44 as a gastric cancer stem cell marker CD44 positive gastric cancer cell line in the stomach and skin of SCID mice Takaishi S et al. Stem Cells 2009:27:106-1020 Objectives • Identifying germline polymorphisms within the CD44 gene for clinical outcome in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma. Patient Characteristics N=137 Median time to recurrence (TTR) yrs (95% CI) Age <60 80 2.2 (1.7, 14.5+) ≥60 57 3.7 (2.1, 12.3+) Sex Male 83 2.3 (1.8, 7.0) Female 54 7.0 (1.5, 8.3+) Race White 63 1.7 (1.2, 4.4) Black 1 0.5+ Asian 28 7.0 (2.3, 14.5+) Hispanic 45 3.7 (2.1, 10.7+) T-category T1a 4 T2a 44 8.3+ (2.9, 8.3+) T3b 79 1.7 (1.4, 4.4) T4b 10 N-category Negative 27 7.0 (1.8, 10.7+) N1 64 4.4 (2.2, 14.5+) N2 31 1.3 (1.1, 2.3) N3 15 1.6 (1.0, 3.8+) Lauren Diffuse 40 3.7 (1.8, 8.9+) Intestinal 50 7.0 (2.1, 14.5+) Mixed 21 12.3+ (1.7, 12.3+) Type of chemotherapy 5-FU/LV 70 7.0 (2.8, 10.6+) 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin 19 1.6 (1.1, 2.9) 5-FU, Cisplatin, CPT-11 25 1.7 (1.2, 14.5+) None 23 2.1 (0.8, 2.5) Radiation Yes 88 2.5 (1.8, 14.5+) No 48 3.7 (1.7, 12.3+) + Estimates were not reached. † Based on log-rank test. a,b Grouped together for the estimates of relative risk Relative risk (95% CI) P value † 0.42 1 0.81 (0.48, 1.36) 0.85 1 0.95 (0.56, 1.63) 0.085 1 — 0.45 (0.23, 0.91) 0.63 (0.34, 1.17) 0.013 1 2.04 (1.14, 3.67) 0.004 1 0.99 (0.47, 2.11) 2.62 (1.15, 5.94) 1.96 (0.73, 5.32) 0.87 1 0.87 (0.45, 1.67) 1.04 (0.45, 2.41) 0.003 1 2.66 (1.23, 5.76) 1.46 (0.71, 3.01) 2.80 (1.48, 5.27) 0.92 1 1.03 (0.60, 1.76) Methods • gDNA was isolated either from blood or from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. • PCR-RFLP was used to determine the polymorphisms Selected germline polymorphisms CD44 rs4755392 CD44 rs187116 5´ 1 2 3 4 5 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 8 16 17 18 19 s6 s7 s8 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 v1 v2 v3 v4 v5 v6 v7 v8 v9 v10 s9 20 s10 3´UTR CD44 rs8193 CD44 rs7116432 Transcriptional regulation CD44 rs187116 predicts tumor recurrence 1,0 Log-Rank P value = 0.022 Estimated Recurrence-Free Probability 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 CD44 A/A (n=30) 0,3 CD44 A/G or G/G (n=94) 0,2 0,1 0,0 TTR: 2.1 yrs 0 2 TTR: 7.0 yrs 4 6 8 10 Years since Diagnosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer 12 14 CD44 rs187116 is associated with overall survival 1,0 Log-Rank P value = 0.079 Estimated Probability of Survival 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 CD44 A/A (n=30) 0,3 0,2 CD44 A/G or G/G (n=94) 0,1 OS: 4.1 yrs 0,0 0 2 OS: 7.0 yrs 4 6 8 10 12 Years since Diagnosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer 14 CD44 rs7116432 predicts tumor recurrence 1,0 Estimated Recurrence-Free Probability Log-Rank P value = 0.045 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 CD44 G/G (n=36) 0,4 0,3 CD44 A/G or A/A (n=91) 0,2 0,1 0,0 TTR: 2.2 yrs 0 2 TTR: 7.0 yrs 4 6 8 10 Years since Diagnosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer 12 14 CD44 rs7116432 predicts overall survival 1,0 Log-Rank P value = 0.018 Estimated Probability of Survival 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 CD44 G/G (n=36) 0,4 0,3 0,2 CD44 A/G or A/A (n=91) 0,1 OS: 3.8 yrs 0,0 0 2 OS: 7.3 yrs 4 6 8 10 12 Years since Diagnosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer 14 Combined analysis of risk alleles for time to recurrence 1,0 Estimated Recurrence-Free Probability Adjusted P value = 0.016 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 CD44 1-2 Favorable alleles (n=55) 0,4 0,3 CD44 0 Favorable alleles (n=67) 0,2 0,1 0,0 TTR: 7.0 yrs TTR: 1.7 yrs 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Years since Diagnosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer 14 Combined analysis of risk alleles for overall survival 1,0 Adjusted P value = 0.019 Estimated Probability of Survival 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 CD44 1–2 Favorable alleles (n=55) 0,4 0,3 CD44 0 Favorable alleles (n=67) 0,2 0,1 OS: 3.6 yrs 0,0 0 2 OS: 7.3 yrs 4 6 8 10 Years since Diagnosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer 12 14 Multivariate Analysis Time to recurrence N* Relative risk (95% CI) A/A 30 1 (Reference) A/G,G/G 92 3.81 (1.45, 9.98) G/G 34 1 (Reference) A/G,A/A 88 1.49 (0.66, 3.36) 1-2 Favorable 55 1 (Reference) 0 Favorable 67 2.41 (1.18, 4.92) P value † Overall survival Relative risk (95% CI) P value † CD44rs187116 1 (Reference) 0.007 3.52 (1.16, 10.65) 0.026 CD44rs7116432 1 (Reference) 0.34 2.31 (0.81, 6.60) 0.12 Combined 1 (Reference) 0.016 2.74 (1.18, 6.38) * Patients with incomplese genotyping were excluded in the multivatiate analysis † adjusted for T category, N category, race and type of therapy 0.019 Conclusions • CD44 gene polymorphisms are associated with TTR and OS in the multivariate analysis • CD44 polymorphisms may identify patients at high risk for tumor recurrence • CD44 might be a promising target for drug development Future directions • These results need to be validated in large, prospective biomarker embedded clinical trials. • Mechanistic studies need to explore the function of these polymorphisms. • The pharmacogenetic analysis should be expanded to the CD44 pathway. Acknowledgements Medical Oncology: Heinz-Josef Lenz, Syma Iqbal Anthony El-Khoueiry, Statistics: Dongyun Yang, Susan Groshen Dr. Lenz´ Lab: Georg Lurje, Wu Zhang, Yan Ning, Pierre Bohanes, Siwen Hu, Rita El-Khoueiry Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: Derek G. Power, Laura H. Tang, Manish Shah Grants: Dhont Foundation Austrian Society of Hematology and Oncology