* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Mantle Flow at a Subduction
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Mantle Flow at a Subduction-Transfrom Plate Boundary Margarete Jadamec and Magali Billen, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of California, Davis Using high-resolution, instantaneous 3D viscous deformation models run with CitcomCU, we constrain how Neogene deformation in southern Alaska is linked to the subducted Pacific slab in the subsurface. The slab thermal structure incorporates the plate age at the time of subduction and the thermal structure of the overriding North American plate is constrained by heat flow and seismic observations of crust and lithosphere thickness (Fig. 1a). The model rheology is a composite dislocation-diffusion creep viscosity with a depth-dependent plastic yield stress. Plate boundaries are modeled as low viscosity shear zones. We compare the mantle flow and surface deformation for two end-member slab shapes to observations of shear-wave splitting in the mantle, the surface distribution of volcanism and dynamic topography, and plate motions. We find that a slab shape missing the northwest extension of the slab from 100–300 km depth, as constrained by seismicity and seismic tomography, is more consistent with the entire suite of observations, than a model that includes this portion of the slab, as would be predicted based only on past plate motions. We also find that models with only a Newtonian mantle viscosity (diffusion creep) have a significantly different flow field and surface deformation than models using the non-Newtonian composite viscosity. Figure 1. Slab Struca) ture and Flow Field. (a) 3D view of slab shape indicating location of two viscosity slices along slabperpendicular arcs, BB’ (beneath the Wrangell b) Volcanics) and DD’ (beMap view: neath Mt. Denali). (b) flow at ~130 km depth Map view of flow at approximately 100 km depth. (c) View, from the northeast, of flow around the slab edge. Effective viscosity along two slab profiles. c) View from the northeast showing flow toward the slab nose. For both slab shapes, the resulting flow exhibits the typical 2D corner-flow pattern away from the slab edge, with flow being drawn into the wedge corner and upwelling beneath the fore-arc. A 3D map view of flow field at a depth of 130 km, for the full-slab shape, shows a strong component of along-slab flow towards the nose of the slab (Fig. 1b, c). This flow is driven by the pressuredifference between the regions beneath and above the slab which draws flow around the slab edge, and the increased mass in the slab nose, which further draws this flow along the slab. References. Jadamec, M. A., 3D Numerical Models of Lithosphere and Mantle Deformation in southern Alaska, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis, 2008. 1