Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Reading assignment presentations for EN0291 S40 “Effect of increasing chip density on the evolution of computer architectures,” IBM J. Res & Dev, Vol. 46. Brendan “Repeater scaling and its impact on CAD,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, Vol. 23(4) Elif “SOI technology for the GHz era,” IBM J. Res. & Dev., Vol. 46. Cesare “Turning Silicon on Its Edge,” IEEE Circuits & Devices Magazine, Jan/Feb’04. Yiwen 1 Effect of Increasing Chip Density on the Evolution of Computer Architectures R. Nair IBM Journal of Research and Development Volume 46 Number 2/3 March/May 2002 2 International Roadmap for Semiconductors (1999) 3 A Billion Transistors on a Chip • “What functions will be expected of billiontransistor chips, and how will they be organized?” • Move Memory closer to the processors (physically speaking) • System on a Chip – integration on the same chip of varied structures such as processors, DRAM, sensors, and transducers 4 Processor Evolution • New generations depending on prediction algorithms • Performance benefit decreasing • Sometimes simpler is better! 5 The Current Techniques (Benchmarks) • Increasing pipeline depth and frequency • Fewer applications responding well 6 Cellular Architectures • Little communication overhead between threads • Connectionist architecture – large number of processors with little memory • Advantages – Off-the-shelf commodity parts – Use existing compilers – Possibilities of redundancy 7 System-on-a-Chip • Integrate functions that are outside processor • Reduce communication costs between elements • Current state – performance decrease when combining technologies on one die • Help with clock skew 8 Conclusions • Convergence of processors • Less focus on more computation power • Scalable, distributed computing 9 The Scaling Challenge: Can Correct-by-Construction Design Help? P. Saxena N. Menezes P. Cocchini D. A. Kirkpatrick Intel Labs. (CAD Research) EN0291 Elif Alpaslan 10 Introduction: FROM LAST LECTURE: • Cmos scaling in VLSI chips bring new design concerns: • increasing dominance of interconnects • leakage • In this paper : Results of scaling studies in the context of typical block level wiring distributions, and study the impact of the identified trends on post-RTL design process. • Goal of the paper: To show how does exponentially increasing repeater and clocked repeater count will effect logic synthesis, technology mapping, layout and new research problems relevant to future designs. 11 Some Scaling Experiments (SPICE) Critical repeater length Min. distance at which inserting repeater speeds up line CRL for M3 & M6 shrink at the rate of 0.57x per generation ~ faster than normal scaling of 0.7x Additional repeaters need to be added during a shrink of an optimal repeated interconnect from one process generation to next. Critical sequential length Max. distance that signal can travel in an optimally sized and buffered interconnect in 1 cycle CSL shrink at a rate of 0.43x per generation ~ faster than normal scaling and the rate of decrease in CRL Ideally shrink interconnects won’t only require additional repeaters but many of them need to be clocked 12 Impact of decrease in critical repeater and sequential lengths How CRL & CSL are migrated across Block Level Wiring Histogram ? • # of nets requiring repeaters ~ area under histogram curve to right of line representing critical length •left migration of critical length exponentially increasing # of nets 13 Impact of decrease in critical repeater and sequential lengths (cont.) Block Level Wiring Histogram (Zoomed View) Increasingly steep slope of curve (log scale on y-axis) => # impacted nets exploding! 14 Impact of decrease in critical repeater and sequential lengths (cont.) • Percentage of block-level nets impacted by repeaters • Percentage of block-level nets impacted by clocked repeaters 15 Impact on POST-RTL CAD • Logic Synthesis and Technology Mapping: – Metrics that drive capacitive load of wires are traditional literal or gate-count and fanout –based wire load metrics and they don’t take into account interconnect repeaters Fanout-based metrics can be misleading due to isolation of some sinks of an interconnect from its driver by a repeater – – Gate count metric can lead to wrong heuristic choices during early stage of synthesis due to more delay migration to repeated interconnects. Amount of logic available in a single pipeline stage shrinks Maximum possible benefit of a good logic synthesis solution reduces 16 Impact on POST-RTL CAD • Placement and Routing: – – • Biggest impact of repeaters on placement stage # of repeaters required by an interconnect is strongly dependant on placement of cells Current Placement Algorithms: – Handle repeater insertion by reserving a certain fraction of block area for repeaters prior placement and then inserts them into long nets using ECO’s after placement • • ECO technique breaks down when more than 5-10%nets in netlist changes – Block level placement algorithms at any level have to deal with the complications that arising from repeater requirements for nets at any other levels of hierarchy. – When CSL shrink below to the dimensions of synthesizable block placement algorithms has to handle clocked repeater insertion which is not as straight forward as buffering. Routing: – – – Routers can’t operate in a purely geometric world, it must understand buffering Complications due to large number of via blockage Complications due to the multi pin nets 17 SOI technology for the GHz era (by G. G. Shahidi – 2002 IBM) • Presented by Cesare Ferri 18 SOI technology for the GHz era (by G. G. Shahidi – 2002 IBM) • Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) : Technology Introduction • Brief History • SOI vs. Bulk (power, performance, scaling) • Applications • Future Trends 19 SOI - Introduction G S SOI : Process Technology Basic Idea : placing a thin layer of insulator upon the substrate n+ CSB Si-poly SiO2 p-substrate D n+ CDB B A lot of capacitance here (i.e. slow) Less area junction capacitance smaller Capacitance of the switch G S n+ n+ CSB Si-poly SiO2 D n+ TBOX SiO2 p-substrate CDB B Faster Transistor! No capacitance here (i.e. fast) 20 SOI : video (© IBM 2002) 21 SOI : Brief History • First developed by IBM in early 70s • Not suitable until `90 (expensive process, progress in bulk CMOS by scaling) • FD(fully depleted)–SOI vs. PD(partially depleted)–SOI • IBM Fabrication technique : SIMOX (Separation by Implantation of Oxygen) Implant Oxigen Annealing 22 SOI vs. Bulk • Pros: – Less Capacitance (~9-25%) , NO Body effect (floating body, Vbs>0) – Same frequency but Lower VDD Lower power – Reduced Short Channel Effects (higher doping concentrations) – No latch-up -> Layout simplicity (no wells, plugs, …) – Same scaling rules of Bulk • Cons: – History-dependent timing (floating body) – Floating Body (Vsb) Reduced effective VT (=F(Vsb)) higher off current, Ioff (OSS: on the other hand, we are decreasing VDD Ioff is the same than in Bulk..) – Self heating (the channel is isolated from the bulk) 23 SOI : Applications & Future Trends • High Performance processors (servers, Cell Processors, XBOX360..) • Low-Power Devices (MPSoC) • Wireless Technology (high-resistivity substrate less crosstalk) • spacecraft, satellites and military electronics (less sensitive to alpha radiation) 24 TURNING SILICON ON ITS EDGE --Overcoming Silicon scaling barriers with double-gate and FinFET technology by Edward J.Nowak, Ingo Aller, Thomas Ludwig, Keunwoo Kim, Rajiv V.Joshi, Ching-Te Chuang, Kerry Bernstein, and Ruchir Puri • Presenter: Yiwen Shi 25 Overcoming Obstacles by Doubling Up Two dominant barriers for further CMOS scaling: • Subthreshold • Gate-dielectric leakages Reduce drain-induced-barrier lowering (DIBL) Improve subthreshold swing (S) Double-gate (DG) FET Lower threshold voltage for a given off-current Higher drive current at lower power-supply voltage 26 Centering of Double-gate Threshold Voltage • Body doping Halo doping • Asymmetric gate work function Two gate electrodes of differing work functions e.g. degenerately doped n+ & p+ polysilicon • Symmetric mid-gap workfunction gate-electrodes Metal gates e.g. nickel-silicide 27 Double-gate Taxonomy Planar DG Vertical DG FinFET Four significant obstacles 28 FinFET-DGCMOS Process Flow & Circuit Demonstration A ring of 60 inverters with a single two-way NAND • Demonstration of DGCMOS static operation: to prove the device parametrics can all be centered to the practical values demanded for VLSI (W,L,T) transient operation: to prove the numerous parasitic elements that can degrade circuit performance can be tamed (inverter delay) • • Achieve numerous landmarks May indeed prove manufacturable 29 Microprocessor Design with FinFETs Sidewall image transfer (SIT) (a converted six-transistor-SRAM cell) Potential for double-gate applications a. Low-power design b. Variable threshold CMOS c. Simplified logic gates Still a lot of challenges… Overall, promising! Device width quantization 30