Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
How To Do Legal Project Management 2017 ACC Legal Operations Conference Chicago, IL June, 2017 Ravi Kiran Mamidanna is Operations Director & Senior Counsel, International Legal Operations at Abbott. He has over 15 years’ of experience as in-house counsel, in Singapore and India. Ravi Kiran Mamidanna 224.668.2110 [email protected] Ravi’s role includes developing and implementing processes and collaborative tools for the international legal team at Abbott, leading cross-regional knowledge management and efficiency improvement projects, managing corporate governance projects related to OUS subsidiaries, supporting integration of international commercial operations in global M&A deals, etc. Prior to joining Abbott, Ravi worked with PepsiCo, Philips Electronics and Marico. He advised on a broad range of issues, particularly in the areas of commercial and contract management, licensing, regulatory, M&A, employment, competition and corporate governance. Ravi received a LL.B. from University of Mumbai and a LL.M. (US Laws) from Washington University in St. Louis. Scott Rosenberg 847.414.8500 [email protected] Scott Rosenberg is Managing Director and Corporate Counsel at LegalShift. He has 25 years’ experience helping law departments identify and translate practice management needs into strategic and actionable business and technology plans. Scott’s work allows his clients to ‘do more with less’, creating improved process and organizational models to support operational best practices. He is highly skilled at developing state-of-the-art technology platforms and implementing successful change management strategies to ensure user adoption. Scott served as Senior Manager of Legal Operations for Kraft Foods Group, Inc. and as Managing Director of Huron Consulting Group’s legal business consulting practice. He ran the corporate legal practices of Project Leadership Associates and Baker Robbins & Company. Scott is a lawyer, CPA and certified project management professional (PMP). He is the co-author of the book General Counsel in the 21st Century: Challenges & Opportunities. Scott earned a BS in accountancy and a JD from the University of Illinois. Dan Safran is President/CEO at LegalShift, LLC. He brings over 30 years of services growth and enablement experience to LegalShift’s clients. He is an advocate and solution innovator, targeting the disruptive change facing the legal world. Dan and his team drive legal operational improvements to global, national, regional and local clients with an emphasis on improving collaboration and enabling transparency between co-dependent legal players. Dan Safran 312.560.8932 [email protected] Prior to LegalShift, Dan spent 15 years as EVP at Project Leadership Associates (at the time, the largest consulting firm serving the US legal market) and led its Legal Market and Management Consulting practice groups. From 2012-2014, he served as company coPresident. Dan was President of Project Leadership Consulting, a pure play management consulting advisory business, until it was sold to PLA in 2002. Dan has held various positions as President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer at a variety of international public and private companies and law firms. Dan’s classical consulting training emanates from eight years spent at Arthur Andersen/Andersen Consulting (now Accenture) early in his career. Polling Question What single initiative will have the greatest long-term impact on law department operations? a. b. c. d. Technology stack upgrade/optimization Cost controls (in management of legal spend) Legal project management Process improvement (e.g., Six Sigma, Lean, Agile, etc.) The answer is C …of course “Our legal department experienced upwards of a 30% reduction in spend and a corresponding 50% reduction in matter duration, directly through the use of LPM” The Truth About Legal Project Management (LPM) What is Legal Project Management (LPM)? A proactive, disciplined approach to managing legal work that involves defining, planning, budgeting, executing, and evaluating a legal matter; requires the application of specific knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to achieve project objectives; requires the use of effective communication to set and meet objectives and expectations; facilitated by dedicated project managers and/or lawyers who are trained in PM skillsets; and does not require technology, but technology can enhance proactive management, communication and data capture. Project Management Is Not Complex Misconception #1: A “Project Manager” spends most of his/her time documenting and updating project plans In reality, Project Managers build trust through transparency; they: 90% communication Statistic from Wrike.com • Define and manage the scope of the work • Make sure all those who need to be involved are in the loop • Provide status updates • Facilitate project meetings and discussions • Communicate meeting minutes and action items • Make sure that risks are addressed on time by the right people Lawyers Are Indeed Project Managers Common Misconception #2: At best, LPM need only apply to large matters where a Project Manager is needed • Many lawyers feel that project management is the domain of Project Managers (PMs)—partially because lawyers have had not been trained on project management. In reality, in-house project management is quickly evolving to accommodate the unique needs of the legal department. − Project management is a well-defined and adopted discipline in most industries—e.g. PMI’s PMBOK. − Current LPM practices evolved out of the needs of innovative law firms— particularly in litigation support and eDiscovery. • To succeed, LPM must: Have demonstrable impact to the work I do Be readily understood Be easy to implement LPM Is Not Process Improvement Common Misconception #3: We have already instituted process improvement initiatives—e.g., Six Sigma, Lean, or Agile Process Improvement purpose: remove waste from repetitive processes • Waste includes: − spending more time that necessary, i.e. “gold plating”; − duplication in effort by timekeepers who are unclear as to their responsibilities; − workflows that are random and inconsistent; and − assignment of higher rate resources to tasks that can be completed by lower rate resources. LPM purpose: clarify expectations in delivery of a singular, specific process— the design and management of a legal matter LPM Need Not Involve Technology Common Misconception #4: We already have a matter management and eBilling system In reality…LPM does not require technology eBilling serves an auditing system… …LPM serves as an early warning system Integrating LPM Into Existing Matter Management Workflows Matter Management Lifecycle Current State 3 ways a Lawyer/Project Manager can lead: • Hindsight: • Insight: reflect and learn from the past. interpret and respond to the present. • Foresight: predict and prepare for the future. Current State: Intake Execute Measure Review Hindsight We call this way to manage a project “matter management & eBilling” Matter Management Lifecycle Future State LPM is a supplement/complement to existing matter management workflow process!! Future State: No Change Needed Assess Plan Execute Close Measure Change Needed Insight Control Review Foresight We call this way to manage a project “legal project management” Overview of the LPM Reference Model Intro to LPM Reference Model Three Stages of LPM Maturity Basic – Manage Your Time • improve your own ability to manage time and work • repeatably apply to the important, evolve to further control the urgent (Covey). Intermediate – Manage Your Team • improve the performance and efficiency of internal legal teams and help to quantify value add. Advanced – Manage Your Vendors • expand LPM processes to include the rest of the supply chain—e.g., outside counsel. Log issue and intake information. • Triage issue (classify, compare and prioritize). • Identify internal capabilities, capacity and cost of handling issue. LPM Reference Model Process Group Overview Assessment Communication Closure Evaluate performance. • Capture lessons learned. • Gather reusable documents. C o m m u n i c a t i o n Reach agreement with client. • Perform resource allocation. • Distribute communication plan. Planning Communication Execution Monitor against project plan. • Measure against desired outcome. • Communicate progress. • Track and manage change. Basic LPM “Tips and Tricks” • Triage the issue—classify, compare and prioritize; “matter intake” is not enough. • Don’t just prepare a schedule; a project plan also includes… – a scope statement, stakeholders list, budget and communications plan. • Create a “bottom up” budget and schedule; it’s the best way to determine/ validate cost and timeline. – “top down” budgeting/scheduling is just a guess • Clarify expectations in writing. • Adhere to change control policy and procedure; it’s critical to avoiding “scope creep”. • Adjust the project plan as authorized/approved; repeat the process group lifecycle. • Capture lessons learned (e.g., opportunities encountered, challenges overcome, templates developed, and best practices instituted)—it only takes minutes. Making LPM Work Create an LPM Culture Tales from the Front LPM is as much a mindset as a process!! How to get buy-in and achieve long-term behavioral change? • Put more emphasis on LPM process, less on performance metrics. – Time management alone is a worthy goal. – Explain that LPM will have a demonstrable impact on smaller matters as much as on larger projects. – Create a process that is systemic, sustainable and repeatable. • Make it personal. – Understand the communication needs of the individual. • Tailor your client and team Communication Plans accordingly. – Promote LPM adoption by tying its benefits to individual motivations. Create an LPM Program 1. Identify your LPM needs and maturity level 2. Adopt/develop an LPM methodology – e.g., ACC, CLOC, LegalShift reference models 3. Create your LPM program – think holistically; modify people (roles/responsibilities), process (workflow diagrams) and technology (optimization of current toolsets) 4. Conduct LPM training – train staff on LPM (principles, desired objectives, action items, tools and techniques) 5. Facilitate an LPM pilot – select a couple of matters in validation of LPM program adoption 6. Get started today (hint—you don’t need technology) Feel Free to Reach Out Dan Safran 312.560.8932 [email protected] Scott Rosenberg 847.414.8500 [email protected] Ravi Kiran Mamidanna 224.668.2110 [email protected]