Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
II: Bandwidth of the Doppler Signal as an Estimator to Detect Left Ventricle Size, Shape and Orientation and to Select View of Apical Ultrasound Images Sigve Hovda and others Abstract— In apical cardiac ultrasound imaging there are three standard views of examination; long axis view LA, two chamber view 2Ch and four chamber view 4Ch. An algorithm on transthoracical cardiac ultrasound images is implemented that selects which of these three apical views and left ventricle LV center, orientation and size. The algorithm is entirely based on images of an estimator M M SDR, closely related to the bandwidth estimator which is discussed in part I. The pulse strategy is duplex and altering from tissue Doppler Imaging TDI and tissue grey scale imaging. The detection routine can therefore be examined in the grey scale images. Because of the cyclic behavior of the blood flow in the heart, it was argued for in part I to temporally average one heart cycle. The start and the end time were found from the t-wave on the ECG signal and the main task of this paper is to examine the inversion of this averaged image IAI. This image was thresholded at 128 different levels, so 128 binary images were created, typically showing white pixels were blood were present. An assumption of the examinator keeping LV centered was taken, and a region selection routine was used to estimate LV cavity in all these 128 images. Furthermore a principal component analysis was used to detect an internal coordinate system of LV, and the behavior of this coordinate system as the threshold decreases have given a tool to detect the type of view and were to place the threshold. I. I NTRODUCTION Echocardiography has become one of the most important tools in diagnosing coronary heart decease, valve deceases and heart failures. Despite this, most common ultrasound devices requires not only clinical experience but also technical knowledge to get optimum use of the device. Most examinations involves strict protocols, adjustment of numerous parameters and manual selection of landmarks in LV. Automatic detecting of features in LV is reported by numerous authors. An algorithm for detection of the atrioventricular AV plane and apex is explained in [1] and an improved version implemented on GE Vingmed Vivid 7. Another AV plane algorithm is patented by (). Authors have reported various image processing tools subsequent to border detection algorithm of endocard (). Even though automatic detecting of features in LV is an established field, no article on detecting the type of view has previously been published. Many applications involves not only knowing where the detectable landmarks are, but also where and what angle it is viewed from. For instance from apical view of blood flow in aorta, it is meaningless to set up a region of interest unless the view is LA. Furthermore AV plane detection should involve three points in LA views and two points in other apical views. Strain rate imaging SRI M-mode in myocardia () should be set only if the views are apical. The region of interest is selected in colorflow imaging, greyscale imaging, tissue Doppler imaging, continuous wave Doppler, pulsed wave Doppler and sonogram imaging. Many applications involving tracking the inner wall of LV endocard [] are semiautomatic requires the user to select landmarks or points in the ventricle such as AV plane, Apex and the LV center. It is quite obvious that reliable detection routines for view point and LV center, orientation and scale would reduce the number of manual parameters. In addition the protocols would be simpler and more flexible. Once the inspector gets a good view of the heart the type of view would be decided, the file labeled, help messages, region of interest set, sonograms of tissue Doppler in myocardium displayed, popup menu asking for CW, PW or colorflow Doppler around the mitral or the aorta valve etc. Furthermore for 3D imaging systems if the mitral apparatus is found then it can be visualized using electronic steering, saving the user from wiggling around in the 3D space. The ultrasonic devices are getting smaller, more portable and less experienced users are expected in fields such as emergency and bed side examinations. This article limits itself to detection of apical views, hoping to build a foundation for detection of transthoracical parasternal views and esophagus views. The methods cited above are all applied to grey scale images and TDI. This algorithm however uses the newly found estimator M M SDR and other challenges and advantages are reviled. Finding an appropriate method for detection have led us to a discussion of the flow patterns in the heart. II. F LOW PATTERN IN THE HEART Even though there are many reasons why signals in the blood sample have a wide bandwidth, this signal can very well have narrow bandwidth. In fact a single frame of the M M SDR data is really not a sharp and reliable image of the heart. Temporal averaging is essential. The blood flow pattern in the heart behaves in a cyclic manner through the heartbeat. In the ejection phase of the systole the velocity field accelerates towards aorta and much turbulent flow is found in the top half of the ventricle, most likely because the ventricle contraction causes blood to be squeezed out of the small pockets in the trabeculae network. After the ejection the ventricle expands very quickly due to the elastic recoil effect of the heart muscle and the pressure that has been build up in the left atria. This causes lateral (perpendicular to ultrasound beam) acceleration near endocard. Also in the filling process the velocity components towards apex (approximately along the beams) decelerates. Turbulence on the backside of the mitral valve is discovered [ref]. In the relaxation stage of diastole spatial variations of the flow pattern is most prominent. (This has an influence on the transition time (the time a scatter is observed) and broadens therefore the bandwidth estimate.) In the atrium systole a final volume of blood is pushed into LV causing a new burst of turbulence. To summarize the spatial variation in turbulence, lateral velocities, local and spacial acceleration and velocity field in the aliased range is behaving cyclic through the heartbeat. This led us to investigate the time averaged image over one heart cycle in more depth. Despite this averaging over the systole will give a better estimate of septal wall and apex, while averaging over the diastole finds the postoral wall better as discussed in part one. Now let us proceed to the main task of this paper which is to investigate the inverse of this averaged image IAI. Figure XX shows such IAI of three hearts from three different views. III. I MAGE PROCESSING OF IAI IAI is a grey level image from 0 to 255, where low values indicates tissue and high values indicates blood. The image is divided into 128 subsets Vα of IAI. V0 contains the points with grey level 127 and above, corresponding to M M SDR = 0.5 and lower, V1 contains points with grey level 126 and above and so on. A connected component method on all Vα around a start point Pstart is used to find estimates of LV cavity. These connected components Uα ’s are therefore subsets of the Vα ’s. To detect LV cavity it is assumed that the examinator is keeping LV roughly centered, which experienced users do quite instinctively. Pstart is therefore the first point in Vα being element of Vα from 4 cm down the center beam. The start at 4 cm is chosen since the bandwidth (and therefore M M SDR experiences artifacts in the extreme near field [2]. If no point is found before 10 cm, than Uα contains no points. In the connected component method an eight adjacency scheme is used meaning that a point p is said to be 8-adjacent of q if p and q are elements of Vα and p is element of N8 (q) which is shown in figure XX. The procedure is iterative and involves placing points into two arrays and updating the image of Vα . Array one consist of the points that are found to be in Uα at this iteration and array two consist of the points found to be in Uα from only the last iteration. The routine works as follows: Pstart is sent to array one. The 8-adjacent of Pstart are found and added to array one. Also these points are set to be the content of array two. Now the image of Vα is updated and the points in array two are set to zero in this image. This is done to insure that no points are selected twice. The next iteration starts with finding the 8-adjacent points of all points in array two. The routine terminates at the iteration where no points are sent to array two and array one contains Kα points xα,k . Note that the connected component U0 of V0 is done first, than U1 of V1 and so on. This makes the algorithm more efficient since calculating Uα writes the points of Uα−1 into array one, labels them zero in the image of Vα and the last points found in Uα−1 into array two. The next part in this algorithm is to do principal component analysis to create an internal coordinate system of the Uα ’s for every α. This involves calculating expected value of xα,k mα and the covariance matrix Cα : Kα 1 X xα,k mα = E{xα,k } = Kα (1) k=1 Cα =E{(xα,k − mα )(xα,k − mα )T } = Kα 1 X (xα,k − mα )(xα,k − mα )T Kα (2) k=1 An approximation of (2) explained in [3] is Cα = Kα 1 X xα,k xα,k T − mα mα T Kα (3) k=1 but this is not used since the cputime is not essential in this study. Note that Cα is a two by two matrix and its eigenvectors eα,1 and eα,2 defines the directions of the internal coordinate system and mα is the center. The two eigenvalues λα,1 and λα,2 are the variances of the distribution of xα,k . The square root of these two eigenvalues is therefore a good measure of the ventricle size. If the distribution of xα,k in the eα,1 direction is roughly Gaussian distributed than more than 95 percent of the eα,1 components of xα,k would be p inside a 4 λα,1 range centered at mα . This is a general property of the Gauss curve and can be found by integrating the Gaussian probability density function from negative two standard deviations to positive two standard deviations. The same p argument holds in the direction of the short axis, so 4pλα,1 is an estimate for the long axis of LV cavity and ofpLV’s short axis Figure XX. A table 4 λα,2 is an estimate p of mα , eα,1 , 4 λα,1 , 4 λα,2 is made corresponding to the different estimates of LV center, direction of long axis, length of long axis and length of short axis. The behavior of these parameters can therefore be examined as a function of the different threshold levels. This examination have given insight not only where the threshold should be set but also which type of view this is. IV. R ESULT Investigating 22 4Ch views, 10 2Ch views and 18 LA views of 10 healthy hearts made it possible to classify behavior of the table discussed above. In 4Ch images a severe clockwise rotation happens when LV connects with RV. This usually happens in the lower part of the septal wall, since the variance increases in fast moving tissue. The final threshold is set to 0.5 lower than the threshold of severe change. In LA images the rotation is counter clockwise, since RV is now on the ”right side” of LV figure XX. A threshold 0.05 below this is then selected. In the 2Ch images these severe change does happen before after 0.9 and it is therefore difficult to set the final threshold. A practical solution is to pick the threshold from the 4Ch image of the heart. If implemented the standard procedure could be to image 4Ch view first so this parameter could be set automatically. R EFERENCES [1] C. Storaa, A. Grandell, T. Gustavi, A. H. Torp, B. Lind, and L. . Brodin, “Simple algorithms for the automatic detection of predefined echocardiographic localisations,” in . International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE) Proceedings. The 12th Nordic Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Berlin / New York, feb 2002, pp. 106–107. [2] B. A. Angelsen, Ultrasound Imaging Wawes, Signals and Signal Processing. Trondheim, Norway: Emantec, 2000, ch. 7.4 and 9. [3] R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing. New Jersey, US: Prentice Hall, Inc, 2001, ch. 11.4.