Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NNSA Project Reviews NNSA Office of Project Analysis, Oversight, and Review (NA-APM-1.1) June 7, 2017 Dwight Henderson, Director [email protected] (301) 903-4393// GTN A-119 APM-1.1 Origin, Mission, & Function A mission support organization that ensures NNSA projects deliver safe, quality construction on budget. • Project Reviews are with us to stay o NNSA is required by DOE Order 413.3B to conduct reviews of Capital Asset Projects • NA-APM-1.1 was established in 2011 to address DOE/NNSA/ Congress/GAO concerns • Independent from the requirements owner (NA-10, 20, 50, etc.) • Independent from Project Execution (NA-APM-1, 20) • NNSA BOP 06.04 identifies three (3) classes of reviews to meet these requirements: o Independent Project Reviews (IPRs), o Annual Peer Reviews (APRs), and o Technical Independent Project Reviews (TIPRs) • Responsible for reviews on Capital Asset Projects > the GPP threshold 2 NA-APM Organization Chart Principal Deputy Administrator NA-2 William ‘Ike’ White Associate Administrator NA-APM Bob Raines Office of Acquisition Management NA-APM-10 Kim Gallegos Office of Project Analysis, Oversight and Review NA-APM-1.1 Dwight Henderson Office of Enterprise Project Management UPF Project Management Office MOX Project Management Office CMRR Project Management Office NA-APM-20 Cameron Manning NA-APM-1.3 Dale Christenson NA-APM-1.4 Scott Cannon NA-APM-1.5 Everett Trollinger 3 3 Planning for Project Reviews • APM-1.1’s Review Schedule is done annually, updated quarterly • Review Committees are staffed in a continuous process o Participate as a Review Subcommittee Member or as an Observer • Project Reviews are added and sometimes deleted from our schedule o FPD’s are responsible to make the dates work for them • Charge Memo will be prepared six (6) weeks prior to a review and sent to the Program Office and FPD for concurrence 4 Project Location 1. LAFO 2. Y-12 3. LAFO Scheduled Review Dates—2017 TPC $M Name Review Type 35-83 Exascale Class Computing Cooling Equipment (EC3E) CD-1 IPR Program Office NA-10 4. LFO 5. 6. 7. 8. LAFO Y-12 Y-12 Y-12 20.4-33.6 Fire Station CD-1 IPR NA-50 TA-3 Substation 28.2 APR NA-50 Replacement Expand Elect. Distr. System 13.7-54.8 CD-2/3 IPR NA-50 (EEDS) LAFO-FOM 92.7 TRP II, Phase C APR 58.6-76.7 Electrorefining (ER) TIPR NA-194 36.5-46.4 Calciner TIPR NPO 20.4-33.6 EOC CD-2/3 IPR NA-50 9. Pantex 100-155 10. LFO 50-90 11. LAFO 1027.3 12. SRFO 136-376 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. SFO 183-250.9 NFO 156-195 LFO 23-49 LAFO 82.7 NFO 28-35.3 18. LAFO 35-83 19. Y-12 20-37 NNSA ABQ Complex Project APR UCEP TIPR LLNL EOC CD-1 IPR RLWTF LLW APR DAF Argus Phase A APR Exascale Class Computing CD-2/3 IPR Cooling Equipment (EC3E) Y-12 Fire Station CD-2/3 IPR LAFO 62-96 RLWTF TLW Y-12 Y-12 Y-12 Y-12 High Explosive Science & APR Engineering (HES&E) Exascale Computing Facility CD-1 IPR Modernization (ECFM) CMRR PF-4 Equip Install Phase 1 (PEI1) ) & RLUOB APR Equip Install Phase 2 (REI2) Tritium Production Capability CD-1 IPR (TPC) 4200-6500 UPF UPF Process Support 60 Facilities (PSF) UPF Main Process Building 4300 (MPB) UPF Salvage and 1330 Accountability Bldg. (SAB) Jan Feb Mar Q2 FY 2017 April May June Q3 FY 2017 July Aug Sept Q4 FY 2017 Oct Nov Dec Q1 FY 2018 24-27 7-10 21-24 7-10 21-24 15-19 19-23 27-30 NA-19 11-14 NA-10 25-28 NA-1 7-11 NA-10 22-25 NA-1 NA-10 NA-50 NA-10 NA-70 12-15 25-29 17-20 10/31-11/3 14-17 NA-10 5-8 19-22 EIR NA-50 NA-10 EIR S-2 EIR S-2 5-9 EIR S-2 5-9 EIR S-2 5-9 16-20 Notes: 1. Completed reviews are shaded in gray. 2. Although EIRs are performed by DOE PM, they are included for convenience. 5/23/17 5 6 Project Reviews by Calendar Year NA-APM-1.1 Project Reviews By Calendar Year (2014 – 2018) 30 Project Reviews 25 20 15 10 5 0 Reviews 2014 7 2015 12 2016 16 2017 19 2018 26 7 Project Review Subcommittees: Areas of Focus • • • Project reviews allow opportunities for continuous improvement across these five (5) areas of focus. Project Reviews help the FPD maintain confidence that project systems, processes, and technical efforts are integrated and effectively coordinated. Reviews also ensure that the project is progressing in step with established baselines. 1 Technical Subcommittee Project Team led by FPD/IPT 2 Cost, Schedule, Risk (CSR) Subcommittee Project Review Committee led by Chairperson 3 Management and Acquisition (M&A) Subcommittee 5 Commissioning Subcommittee 4 Environment, Safety, Health and Quality Assurance (ESH&QA) Subcommittee 8 Technical Subcommittee • Technology, design, and nuclear safety • Confinement and Ventilation/Containers • Design/Construction • Safety in Design • Fire Protection • Rad Protection • Nuclear Safety Basis • Construction Management • ALARA process • Hazards Analysis • Physical Security • • • • • • • • • • • Bulk Chemical Systems Structural and Seismic, NPH Engineering and Design Civil/Structural Electrical Power Systems, I&C Construction Management Technological Readiness Criticality Safety Chemical Safety Mining Engineering LEED and Sustainable Design 9 CSR Subcommittee • Cost estimating • Funding analysis • Schedule estimating • Risk Identification and Management o Risk Analysis • EVMS 10 M&A Subcommittee • • • • • • • Project Management Systems, Controls, and Planning Subcontractor Management and Oversight Capital Asset Acquisition Acquisition Planning Contract Administration Long Lead Procurements Experience working with IAs and other Federal partners (e.g., USACE) • Configuration Management and Document Control, Project Controls • Experience with contract types, including CPFF, CPIF, CPAF, FFP and T&M 11 ESH&QA Subcommittee • • • • • • • • Nuclear Quality (NQA-1) and Quality Assurance Commercial Dedication and Grading Environmental Management, NEPA Permitting (NPDES, State and Local) QA Programs and Procedures Worker Safety and Health, Industrial Hygiene Safeguards and Security 10 CFR 851 12 Cx Subcommittee • Startup and Turnover • Transition to Operations • RCAPTS • Project Closeout • Demolition and Decommissioning (D&D) 13