Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Sitios Contaminados: Situación en Europa ROBERTO PASETTO http://bit.ly/1hv1mxd European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC) Definition of “contaminated site” Thematic strategy for the protection of SOILS – "refers to a well-defined area where the presence of soil contamination has been confirmed and this presents a potential risk to humans, water, ecosystems, or other receptors. Risk management measures (e.g., remediation) may be needed depending on the severity of the risk of adverse impacts to receptors under the current or planned use of the site" Panagos et al. Contaminated sites in Europe: review of the current situation based on data collected through a European network. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/158764 Priorities in the target pollutants According to WHO priority should given to the pollutants on the basis of toxicity, environmental persistence, mobility, and bioaccumulation WHO Europe Areas contaminadas - definición La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), teniendo en cuenta una perspectiva general de salud pública, define las áreas contaminadas “Áreas que albergan o han sido sede de las actividades humanas que han producido o puedan producir contaminación ambiental del suelo, aguas superficiales o subterráneas, aire y cadenas alimentares, que han causado o puedan causar efectos en la salud” What is a contaminated site? Given the WHO definition, a contaminated site can be an area affected by a single chemical contamination of a signle environmental matrix (e.g., the soil contamination caused by a given pesticide) and a large area with soil, water, air, and food chain contamination by multiple chemicals (e.g., the contamination caused by long term emissions of a petrochemical complex) Health Impact Assessment in contaminated sites Characterizing the health impacts of contaminated sites is a complex exercise. Several things contribute to making this particularly challenging: • the very heterogeneous nature of the hazards • a lack of reliable exposure data • the multifaceted aetiology of most of the associations • the complexity of underlying social, economic and occupational factors Complexity of exposure scenarios Contamination sources Transport of pollutants Transformation Environmental fate Env media Route of Exposure From: Paustenbach DJ , Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 3:179-291, 2000 Health Impact Assessment –HOW? L’Health Impact Assessment of contaminated sites can be assessed using the Health Risk Assessment and/or applying epidemiological approaches Health Risk Assessment (HRA) • HRA can be defined as a procedure for characterizing the nature and magnitude of health risks to human beings of chemical contaminants and other stressors that may be present in the environment. It uses standardized tools, formats, and scientifically established assumptions for risk modelling • The main two approaches used for HRA are: (a) chemical - agent based (b) population - health outcome based HRA chemical - agent based A traditional toxicological approach based on a multistep procedure that leads to theoretical estimates of the potential health risk due to estimated exposure levels. It can end in a comparison of estimated potential exposure to the tolerable dose – that is, a comparison between estimated exposure levels and reference values EXAMPLE From: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual. http://1.usa.gov/1bNGaip HRA population health outcome based Involves the estimation of the environmental burden of disease or the use of such tools as comparative risk assessment, is based on producing or gathering and compiling epidemiological evidence and dose−response functions and estimating the excess health risk associated with different exposure scenarios − for example, attributable cases and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) EXAMPLE From: WHO Health impact of PM10 and ozone in 13 Italian cities http://bit.ly/M5ku7Z Epidemiological approaches Epi. Approaches involve the inclusive collection of available health information of resident population, and various agents and exposures. In these assessments, a first descriptive level is based on epidemiological tools that do not require an ad hoc collection of data and aims at describing the health profile of populations. More detailed analyses can be carried out, at higher level of definition, by collecting specific data on health outcomes and/or on exposure. Main objectives of epi. studies Epidemiological studies on contaminated sites can be conceived and carried out with different aims. • DESCRIPTIVE to describe the health profile of populations living in contaminated sites • ANALYTICAL OR ETIOLOGICAL to analyse the associations between environmental exposures and health effects, to verify specific hypothesis • SURVEILLANCE to plan the epidemiological surveillance, to evaluate the evolving pattern of the population health profile http://bit.ly/1g1WeP1 http://bit.ly/19wFN7f Communication and study protocols in contaminated sites Study protocols should consider: • planning communication events at key stages, both during and at the end of the study • adjusting communication so that local authorities are able to understand the needs of the population • planning for flexibility in the study protocol and for the possibility of changing technical aspects once the study has begun • clearly describing roles and responsibilities from the outsets • directly involving the general public in all stages so as to gain their trust and commitment, thus ensuring that the project results are more likely to be accepted and promoted GRACIAS POR SU ATENCION!