* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Net Capital Expenditures
Negative gearing wikipedia , lookup
Conditional budgeting wikipedia , lookup
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
Household debt wikipedia , lookup
Business valuation wikipedia , lookup
Private equity in the 1980s wikipedia , lookup
Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup
Capital gains tax in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Valuation FIN449 Michael Dimond DISTORTIONS Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Expected FCF • Forecast, then Recast – Start by predicting what is likely to be published on the financial statements. – After that, recast the figures to better reflect the economic realities for operating leases, R&D (if applicable) and sustainability of operating cash flows. • Compute FCFs using more than one formula to ensure you have found all the issues in your figures. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Updating Earnings • When valuing companies, we often depend upon financial statements for inputs on earnings and assets. Annual reports are often outdated and can be updated by using– Trailing 12-month data, constructed from quarterly earnings reports. – Informal and unofficial news reports, if quarterly reports are unavailable. • Updating makes the most difference for smaller and more volatile firms, as well as for firms that have undergone significant restructuring. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration One-Time and Non-recurring Charges • Assume that you are valuing a firm that is reporting a loss of $ 500 million, due to a one-time charge of $ 1 billion. What is the earnings you would use in your valuation? A loss of $ 500 million A profit of $ 500 million Would your answer be any different if the firm had reported onetime losses like these once every five years? Yes No Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Correcting Accounting Earnings • The Operating Lease Adjustment: While accounting convention treats operating leases as operating expenses, they are really financial expenses and need to be reclassified as such. This has no effect on equity earnings but does change the operating earnings • COGS Adjustment: Inventory costs are associated with particular goods using one of several formulas, including specific identification, last-in first-out (LIFO), first-in first-out (FIFO), or average cost. This may affect the value of a firm compared to the accounting information presented. • The R & D Adjustment: Since R&D may create value for multiple years, operating income can be adjusted (only if there is significant intellectual property). Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Dealing with Operating Lease Expenses • Operating Lease Expenses are treated as operating expenses in computing operating income. In reality, operating lease expenses should be treated as financing expenses, with the following adjustments to earnings and capital: • Debt Value of Operating Leases = PV of Operating Lease Expenses at the pre-tax cost of debt • Adjusted Operating Earnings Adjusted Operating Earnings = Operating Earnings + Operating Lease Expenses - Depreciation on Leased Asset – As an approximation, this works: Adjusted Operating Earnings = Operating Earnings + Pre-tax cost of Debt * PV of Operating Leases. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Effects of Capitalizing Operating Leases • Debt : will increase, leading to an increase in debt ratios used in the cost of capital and levered beta calculation • Operating income: will increase, since operating leases will now be before the imputed interest on the operating lease expense • Net income: will be unaffected since it is after both operating and financial expenses anyway • Return on Capital will generally decrease since the increase in operating income will be proportionately lower than the increase in book capital invested Michael Dimond School of Business Administration The Magnitude of Operating Leases Operating Lease expenses as % of Operating Income 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.0 0% Marke t App arel Stores Furn iture Store s Resta urants Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Dealing with Operating Leases • In 1998, Home Depot did not carry much in terms of traditional debt on its balance sheet. However, it did have significant operating leases. • When doing firm valuation, these operating leases have to be treated as debt. This, in turn, will mean that operating income has to get restated. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Operating Leases at Home Depot in 1998 • The pre-tax cost of debt at the Home Depot is 5.80% Year Commitment Present Value 1 $294.00 $277.88 2 $291.00 $259.97 3 $264.00 $222.92 4 $245.00 $195.53 5 $236.00 $178.03 6 and beyond $2700.00 $1,513.37 • Debt Value of leases = $2,647.70 Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Operating Leases at Home Depot in 1998 • The pre-tax cost of debt at the Home Depot is 5.80% Year Commitment Present Value 1 $294.00 $277.88 2 $291.00 $259.97 3 $264.00 Average = 266 $222.92 4 $245.00 $195.53 5 $236.00 $178.03 6 and beyond $2700.00 $1,513.37 PV of 270/yr for 10 yrs 2700 / 266 =~10 yrs 2700 / 10 = 270/yr for years 6-15 • Debt Value of leases = $2,647.70 Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Operating Leases at Home Depot in 1998 kd Year 5.80% Commitment 1 294 2 291 3 264 4 245 5 236 6 & Beyond 2700 Commitment 294 291 264 245 236 266 10.15038 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PV 277.8828 259.9691 222.9189 195.5345 178.0261 192.5084 181.955 171.9802 162.5522 153.641 145.2183 137.2574 129.7329 122.6209 115.8987 Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Other Adjustments from Op. Leases EBIT EBIT (1-t) Debt Operating Lease Expensed $ 2,661mil $1,730 mil $1,433 mil Operating Lease converted to Debt $ 2,815 mil $1,829 mil $ 4,081 mil • What else? Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Inventory Methods: LIFO vs FIFO • (a) First-in, First-out (FIFO): Under FIFO, the cost of goods sold is based upon the cost of material bought earliest in the period, while the cost of inventory is based upon the cost of material bought later in the year. This results in inventory being valued close to current replacement cost. • (b) Last-in, First-out (LIFO): Under LIFO, the cost of goods sold is based upon the cost of material bought towards the end of the period, resulting in costs that closely approximate current costs. The inventory, however, is valued on the basis of the cost of materials bought earlier in the year. • A switch from LIFO to FIFO in valuing inventory will likely cause a rise in net income and a decrease in cash flows (because of the tax effect). • Firms that choose to use the LIFO approach to value inventories have to specify in a footnote the difference in inventory valuation between FIFO and LIFO, and this difference is termed the LIFO reserve. This can be used to adjust the beginning and ending inventories, and consequently the cost of goods sold, and to restate income based upon FIFO valuation. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Capitalizing R&D Expenses • Accounting standards require us to consider R&D as an operating expense even though it is designed to generate future growth. In some firms, it is more logical to treat it as capital expenditures. • To capitalize R&D, – Specify an amortizable life for R&D (2 - 10 years) – Collect past R&D expenses for as long as the amortizable life – Sum up the unamortized R&D over the period. (Thus, if the amortizable life is 5 years, the research asset can be obtained by adding up 1/5th of the R&D expense from five years ago, 2/5th of the R&D expense from four years ago...: Michael Dimond School of Business Administration The Magnitude of R&D Expenses R&D as % of Operating Income 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.0 0% Marke t Petro leum Compu ters Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Capitalizing R&D Expenses: Cisco • R & D was assumed to have a 5-year life. (all figures as of 1999 data) Year R&D Expense Unamortized portion Amortization this year 1999 1594.00 1.00 1594.00 1998 1026.00 0.80 820.80 $205.20 1997 698.00 0.60 418.80 $139.60 1996 399.00 0.40 159.60 $79.80 1995 211.00 0.20 42.20 $42.20 1994 89.00 0.00 0.00 $17.80 Total $ 3,035.40 $ 484.60 Value of research asset = $ 3,035.4 million Amortization of research asset in 1998 = $ 484.6 million Adjustment to Operating Income = $ 1,594 million - 484.6 million = 1,109.4 million Michael Dimond School of Business Administration The Effect of Capitalizing R&D • Operating Income will generally increase, though it depends upon whether R&D is growing or not. If it is flat, there will be no effect since the amortization will offset the R&D added back. The faster R&D is growing the more operating income will be affected. • Net income will increase proportionately, depending again upon how fast R&D is growing • Book value of equity (and capital) will increase by the capitalized Research asset • Capital expenditures will increase by the amount of R&D; Depreciation will increase by the amortization of the research asset; For all firms, the net cap ex will increase by the same amount as the after-tax operating income. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Net Capital Expenditures • Net capital expenditures represent the difference between capital expenditures and depreciation. Depreciation is a cash inflow that pays for some or a lot (or sometimes all of) the capital expenditures. • In general, the net capital expenditures will be a function of how fast a firm is growing or expecting to grow. High growth firms will have much higher net capital expenditures than low growth firms. • Assumptions about net capital expenditures can therefore never be made independently of assumptions about growth in the future. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Capital expenditures should include • Research and development expenses, once they have been re-categorized as capital expenses. The adjusted net cap ex will be Adjusted Net Capital Expenditures = Net Capital Expenditures + Current year’s R&D expenses - Amortization of Research Asset • Acquisitions of other firms, since these are like capital expenditures. The adjusted net cap ex will be Adjusted Net Cap Ex = Net Capital Expenditures + Acquisitions of other firms - Amortization of such acquisitions Two caveats: 1. Most firms do not do acquisitions every year. Hence, a normalized measure of acquisitions (looking at an average over time) should be used 2. The best place to find acquisitions is in the statement of cash flows, usually categorized under other investment activities Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Cisco’s Acquisitions: 1999 Acquired GeoTel Fibex Sentient American Internet Summa Four Clarity Wireless Selsius Systems PipeLinks Amteva Tech Method of Acquisition Pooling Pooling Pooling Purchase Purchase Purchase Purchase Purchase Purchase Price Paid $1,344 $318 $103 $58 $129 $153 $134 $118 $159 $2,516 Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Cisco’s Net Capital Expenditures in 1999 Cap Expenditures (from statement of CF) - Depreciation (from statement of CF) Net Cap Ex (from statement of CF) + R & D expense - Amortization of R&D + Acquisitions Adjusted Net Capital Expenditures = $ 584 mil = $ 486 mil = $ 98 mil = $ 1,594 mil = $ 485 mil = $ 2,516 mil = $3,723 mil (Amortization was included in the depreciation number) Michael Dimond School of Business Administration