* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Galaxy Evolution in the SDSS Low
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Galaxy Evolution in the SDSS Low-z Survey Huan Lin Experimental Astrophysics Group Fermilab 1 A Low Redshift Galaxy Survey Jim Annis, Huan Lin, Mariangela Bernardi ● ● Science Goals – Cluster Finding – Luminosity Function – Velocity Dispersion Function Sample Selection – Southern Equatorial Survey spectroscopy program – Aimed at z < 0.15 galaxies with 17.77 < r (Petro) < 19.5 – Photometric redshift selection plus sparse sampling – Improved photo-z’s using catalog-level coadded magnitudes 2 Low-z 3 Southern Survey and Special Spectroscopic Programs ● ● ● ● Mostly on Stripe 82, including u-selected galaxies, low-z galaxies, deep LRGs, faint quasars, spectra of everything, stellar programs, … See the Southern Equatorial Survey plates page at http://www-sdss.fnal.gov/targetlink/southernEqSurvey/ See Ivan Baldry’s page and catalogs at http://mrhanky.pha.jhu.edu/~baldry/sdss-southern/ Will be further documented in DR4 paper and web site 4 5 6 Catalog-Coadded Magnitudes ● ● ● Magnitudes catalog-coadded from 62 Stripe 82 imaging runs: asinh mag flux average standard mag Average of 10 runs per object over factor of 3 improvement in S/N: e.g., at spectroscopic sample limit rP=19.5, median Petrosian mag error is 0.07 mag for an individual run (measured from empirical run-to-run scatter), but only 0.02 mag for catalog coadd Star/galaxy separation criterion rPSF – rmodel 0.24, same as for MAIN sample but using coadded magnitudes 7 Redshift Completeness ● ● ● ● Redshift sample defined using spectro1d redshift confidence zConf > 0.7 Redshift completeness (fraction of galaxies with redshifts) somewhat complicated due to variety of samples involved Compute redshift completeness on a grid of bins in the most relevant variables: Petrosian r-band magnitude, photometric redshift, and g-r model color Redshift success rate (fraction of fibers with successful redshift) is much simpler: overall > 90% and a weak function of magnitude, photo-z, and color 8 Targets w/ fibers Successful redshifts Petrosian r Photo-z Model g-r 9 Galaxy Templates ● ● ● ● Two galaxy templates derived from ugriz magnitudes of Stripe 82 galaxies, using variant of Csabai et al. technique, iterating from CWW E and Im SEDs ugriz magnitudes of each galaxy used to find the bestfitting linear combination (in flux) of the two galaxy templates This simple model works well, with 68% residuals of 0.03 mag or less for all filters except u (~0.1 mag) r-band k-corrections and rest-frame g-r colors derived from best-fitting template 10 Cumulative distributions of magnitude residuals for galaxy template fits 11 r-band LFs of Red and Blue Sequence Galaxies ● ● ● ● Red and blue sequences fit by double gaussian model, as in Baldry et al. (2004), but using rest-frame g-r color Red/blue division using simple cut in the plane of rest g-r color vs. r-band absolute magnitude Evolving LF model (Lin et al. 1999), fit using standard maximum likelihood techniques o M*(z) = M*(0) – Qz o constant 0.4 P z o (z) = (0) 10 See also similar LF evolution analyses from Baldry et al. on uband galaxy survey and Yasuda et al. on main sample 12 Red Sequence N=22841 Blue Sequence N=32051 13 shallow = –0.5 Similar M*– 5 log h = –20.55 at z = 0.1 steep = –1.35 14 increasing redshift increasing redshift 15 increasing redshift increasing redshift 16 Evolution of M* with redshift 17 number density increases at higher z M* brighter at higher z 18 luminosity density increases at higher z M* brighter at higher z 19 Luminosity Density 20 Luminosity Density 21 Summary ● ● ● ● Linear trend of M* vs. z, with constant , is reasonable model, though with deviation at lowest redshifts Red and blue sequences both show significant brightening of M* at higher z (Q = 1.9, 1.5), amounting to 0.6 and 0.45 magnitudes from z = 0 to z = 0.3 Red and blue sequences show opposite number density evolution trends, so that luminosity density trends are different: constant for red, factor of 1.8 increase for blue from z = 0 to z = 0.3 r-band luminosity densities and trends consistent with higher-redshift CNOC2 results 22