Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
A Phase III trial of 5-FU/l-leucovorin/ irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer FIRIS study Ken Kato, Kei Muro, Hirofumi Yasui, Akihito Tsuji, Shinichi Sameshima, Hideo Baba, Taroh Satoh, Tadamichi Denda, Kenji Ina, Kenichi Sugihara On behalf of the FIRIS study group Background • S-1(tegafur,CDHP,Oxo) is an oral “DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidine (DIF)” widely used for various solid tumors in Japan. • Several phase II studies of irinotecan plus S-1 combination therapy (IRIS) have shown promising efficacy and safety for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). • This phase III trial was conducted to examine whether IRIS is non-inferior to FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC. Biochemical action of S-1 S-1 = Tegafur + CDHP + Oxo Tegafur Liver and Tumor (CYP 2A6) Neurotoxicity Tumor 5-FU CDHP Antitumor activity FdUMP GI toxicity FdUMP Myelotoxicity GI tract DPD F-β-Ala FdUMP OPRT Oxo Bone marrow Degradation Phosphorylation OPRT, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase FIRIS Study Design Metastatic CRC FOLFIRI (n=213) Age 20-75y 2nd line PS 0-1 No prior Irinotecan n=426 Accrual:2006.1-2008.2 Stratification factors: ・PS (0/1) ・Prior chemotherapy (with/without L-OHP) ・Institution R Irinotecan: 150 mg/m2 d1, 15 l-LV: 200mg/m2 d1, 15 5-FU: 400mg/m2 bolus d1, 15 5-FU: 2,400mg/m2 46 hr civ d1,2, &d15,16 repeated every 4 wks IRIS (n=213) Irinotecan: 125mg/m2 d1, 15 S-1: 80-120mg*/body d1-14 repeated every 4 wks *According to body surface area, BSA < 1.25 m2, 80 mg/day, 1.25=<BSA <1.5, 100 mg/day; BSA >=1.5, 120 mg/day Endpoints and Statistical considerations • Primary objective – Progression free survival • Secondary objectives – overall survival, response rate, toxicity and cost. • Sample size – With 400 patients, this had 80% power to detect non-inferiority of IRIS vs. FOLFIRI, defined by the upper limit of the 95% CI for the HR of ≤1.333 Main inclusion criteria • • • • • • • • • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma Inoperable mCRC No prior Irinotecan Failure to 1st line chemotherapy for mCRC or relapse during or within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy Age 20-75 ECOG PS 0,1 Adequate organ functions No prior radiotherapy for mCRC Written informed consent Baseline characteristics Male / Female Median Age, years (range) ECOG PS 0/1 FOLFIRI (n=213) IRIS (n=213) 123/90 120/93 63 (32-75) 61 (29-75) 160/53 158/55 62 124 13 13 1 60 133 8 11 1 Prior Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin Yes/No 128/85 129/84 Number of metastatic sites 1/≥2 92/120 Histologic Type Well differentiated Moderately differentiated Poorly differentiated Other Undetermined 88/124 PFS (ITT population) FOLFIRI (n=213) Proportion of patients 1 IRIS (n=213) Progression, n 194 195 Median, months 5.1 5.8 Adjusted HR 1.077 (95% CI) 0.879 to 1.319 0.75 Upper limit below < 1.333 (non inferiority margin) p=0.039 0.5 0.25 FOLFIRI IRIS 5.1 5.8 0 No. pts at risk FOLFIRI 213 IRIS 213 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Progression-Free Survival (months) 147 149 86 89 54 43 35 20 19 10 11 5 8 4 3 1 OS (ITT population) FOLFIRI (n=213) Proportion of patients 1 IRIS (n=213) Events, n 117 110 Median, months 18.2 19.5 Adjusted HR 0.909 (95% CI) 0.699 to 1.181 0.75 0.5 0.25 FOLFIRI IRIS Median-follow-up time:12.9 18.2 0 3 No. patients at risk FOLFIRI 213 IRIS 213 208 202 6 9 12 15 18 19.5 21 24 50 47 24 24 Survival Time (months) 179 180 160 155 126 125 99 92 78 67 Response rate (of the patients who had >1 measurable lesion) (%) 20 18.8% 16.7% (95%CI :13.4-25.2) (95%CI :11.5-23.1) 10 0 FOLFIRI (n=174) RECIST1.0 (investigator assessed) IRIS (n=181) Adverse events (safety analysis population) Adverse event CTC-AE v3.0 FOLFIRI (n=211) IRIS (n=210) Grade 3-4 Grade 3-4 No. % No. % Neutropenia 110 52.1 76 36.2 Leukopenia 33 15.6 38 18.1 Hemoglobin 14 6.6 21 10.0 Thrombocytopenia 2 0.9 0 0.0 Diarrhea 10 4.7 43 20.5 Fatigue 7 3.3 18 8.6 Febrile neutropenia 2 0.9 10 4.8 Mucositis / Stomatitis 1 0.5 6 2.9 Subgroup analysis : PFS No. of Patients P value for interaction Male Female 243 183 0.23 <65 65-75 252 174 0.76 122 257 21 24 0.93 0 1 Prior chemotherapy with oxaliplatin Yes No 318 108 0.88 257 169 0.03 ITT population 426 Subgroup Sex Age Histologic type Well differentiated adeno. Moderate differentiated adeno. Poorly differentiated adeno. Other ECOG PS IRIS better .3 .5 .7 1 2 3 4 FOLFIRI better PFS and OS according to prior CTx (with or without L-OHP) L-OHP(+) PFS 1 0.75 mPFS FOLFIRI n=128 3.9M IRIS n=129 5.7M 0.5 HR 0.876 (0.677 -1.133) 0.2 5 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Proportion of patients Proportion of patients L-OHP(+) 24 OS 1 0.75 0.5 FOLFIRI n=128 0.25 0 IRIS n=129 3 L-OHP(-) 1 PFS 0.75 FOLFIRI n=85 IRIS n=84 0.5 6.0M HR 1.490 (1.079 -2.059) 0.25 0 mPFS 7.8M 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Progression-Free Survival (months) 9 12 15 18 21 24 Survival Time (months) Proportion of patients Proportion of patients Progression-Free Survival (months) 6 HR 0.781 (0.571 -1.067) L-OHP(-) 1 OS 0.75 0.5 HR 1.302 (0.806 -2.104) FOLFIRI n=85 0.25 0 IRIS n=84 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Survival Time (months) 24 Cost analysis Group Median cost per cycle* FOLFIRI \214,092 (€1,647) IRIS \134,774 (€1,037) *Included only medical direct cost Conclusions • This is the first phase III trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of an oral FU derivative combination with irinotecan compared to FOLFIRI. • Toxicities of both groups were manageable. • IRIS can potentially replace FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC. FIRIS Study Group Participant institutions Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Shizuoka Cancer Center National Cancer Center Hospital Kochi Health Sciences Center Gunma Cancer Center Kumamoto University Kinki University School of Medicine Chiba Cancer Center Nagoya Memorial Hospital Shikoku Cancer Center Saitama Cancer Center Osaka Medical College Hospital National Kyushu Cancer Center Osaka City General Hospital Gunma University Hospital Hokkaido University Hospital Kyoto Medical Center Keio University Hospital Kansai Rosai Hospital Tokyo Medical and Dental University Board members Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital Showa University Toyosu Hospital Minoh City Hospital Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Toyama University Hospital Kagoshima Medical Center Tonan Hospital Kanagawa Cancer Center Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Saku Central Hospital Hyougo Cancer Center Hiroshima University Hospital Tomakomai Nisshou Hospital Aichi Cancer Center Aichi Hospital Nagoya Medical Center Kobe University Hospital Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital Yokohama City University Hospital Kitasato University Hospital • Steering Committee –Kenichi Sugihara –Yoshito Komatsu –Yasuhiro Shimada –Hiroya Takiuchi –Narikazu Boku –Masahiko Watanabe • Independent Data Monitoring Committee –Yu Sakata –Yasuo Ohashi –Nobuyuki Yamamoto • Independent Central Review Committee –Atsushi Ohtsu –Yasuaki Arai –Junji Tanaka • Medical Adviser –Ichinosuke Hyodo • Statistical Adviser –Satoshi Morita This study was sponsored by TAIHO and Daiichi Sankyo