Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Security Research Conference 2010, Kursaal Oostende, 22 September 2010 The development of the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) Oliver SEIFFARTH DG Home Affairs European Commission Migration routes into the Schengen area Canary Islands Turkey Eastern Med Libya Current main challenge: Detection, tracking & interception of small boats, used for illegal migration and cross-border crime (e.g. narcotics trafficking). CENTRO DE COORDINACIÓN REGIONAL DE CANARIAS EUROSUR Definition (COM(2008)68final of 13.2.2008) Information sharing and cooperation mechanism enabling Member States' border control authorities and FRONTEX to improve their situational awareness and reaction capabilities with the aim to 1) reduce number of illegal migrants entering EU undetected; 2) reduce the death toll of migrants at sea; 3) increase internal security by preventing cross-border crime. “Federation of systems”, using existing systems (e.g. AIS, SafeSeaNet) and common surveillance tools (e.g. satellites). Development in 3 phases and 8 separate, but interlinked steps. Testing/validation in pilot and FP7 projects. Implementation by Member States, partly at EU level (e.g. FRONTEX, Global Monitoring for Environment and Security/GMES). STEP 1 A MS NCC B MS NCC C NCC STEP 2 Radar station Patrol Canary Islands, Mediterranean Sea Black Sea STEP 3 STEP 3: Logistic & financial support to neighboring third countries to set up a border surveillance infrastructure. STEP 3 Third countries Third countries F MS NCC NCC NCC MS D STEP 1 PHASE 1: Streamlining at MS level MS MS STEP 2: Setting up a secure rea communication network A en g between the national n he FRONTEX c S / coordination centers EU & FRONTEX. STEP 2 E EUROSUR - PHASE 1 STEP 1: Streamlining & upgrading national infrastructures by setting up of one single national coordination centre & one single national border surveillance system. PHASE 1: Streamlining at MS level As of 2008: Setting up of national coordination centres (NCC) and national surveillance systems. 2008-2010: Guidelines for cooperation between NCCs / FRONTEX. 2009: FRONTEX assessment on EU external borders and needed infrastructure in third countries. 2009-2010: Management & technical concepts for NCCs and national systems and specifications for communication network. 2010-2011: Pilot project and data model for the communication network. 2011: Legislative proposal. A MS NCC B MS NCC C NCC Radar station Patrol Canary Islands, Mediterranean Sea Black Sea STEP 4 STEP 6 ILO network Third countries STEP 5 Third countries F MS NCC NCC PHASE 2: Common tools at EU level MS NCC MS D MS STEP 5: Common application of surveillance tools. FRONTEX could be facilitator. rea A STEP 6: Common pre-frontier en g n Intelligence picture. FRONTEX c he S / EU E STEP 4: R&D (FP7) to improve performance of surveillance tools (satellites, UAVs etc.). PHASE 2: Common tools at EU level Information Sources Reports, sensor systems, HUMINT, SIGINT, IMINT, OSINT, NCC, ICC, ILO, third countries, … 1 Consistency Check 2 Evaluation Consistency & Plausibility Check Operational Information (dynamic) Strategic Key Information 3 Analysis, Integration Fusion Tactical and operational level information 4 6 CPIP Generation CPIP Sources 7 5 Strategic level information CPIP Knowledge Base Formalised description of vocabulary and concepts of the CPIP Basic Geodata Mainly for visualisation purposes As of 2008: FP7 space/ security research program used for EUROSUR goals. 2008-2010: GMES concept on how to receive data from satellites/UAVs for border surveillance purposes. 2009-2010: Specifications for common pre-frontier intelligence picture (CPIP) to be managed by FRONTEX. 2011-2014: FP7 integration & demonstration projects to test EUROSUR components. FP7 Security projects Name PERSEUS SeaBILLA I2C Coordinator Indra (ES) SELEX (IT) DNCS (FR) Industry 30, incl. EADS, Siemens, DNCS Detection of small craft. Fusion of information. Establishment of situational picture at regional/EU level. Presentation of information. Interoperability. 25, incl. Indra, EADS 19, incl. Zeppelin, Furuno, Rockwell Collins System of shore-based and deployable sensor platforms to track vessel movements to detect suspicious events and threats. Demonstration / exercises 2 demo campaigns: -Western Med – 2013 -Eastern Med – 2014 Illegal migration & drugs 2 test scenarios: English channel (drugs) & Southern Med (illegal migration) Mediterranean border zones. Start Duration Budget (EU) 1st quarter 2011 4 years M€ 42, 3 (M€ 27, 8) June 2010 45 months M€ 15, 43 (M€ 9, 84) July 2010 48 months M€ 15, 34 (M€ 9, 87) Key topics Define architecture for surveillance, integrating novel sensors. Draws on OPERAMAR conclusions. A MS NCC B MS NCC C NCC Radar station Patrol STEP 7: Common information sharing environment for border control / internal security purposes covering Canary Islands, Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea. Third countries F Third countries MS NCC NCC NCC E MS D Phase 3: Common Info Sharing Environment MS MS STEP 8: Common information sharing environment for the whole EU maritime domain, covering all maritime activities, such as maritime safety, protection of the marine environment, fisheries control, law enforcement etc. a e r nA e ng e h FRONTEX Sc / EU PHASE 3: Common info sharing environment COM(2009)538 of 15.10.2009 INFORMATION LAYERS NATIONAL AUTHORITIES User-defined Situational Picture Defence Information sharing Internal security PT MARSUR ? Fishery control Maritime authority EUROSUR VMS SAFESEANET SAFESEANET