Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
09/07/11 Contract No. 250505 inCASA Integrated Network for Completely Assisted Senior citizen’s Autonomy Evaluation ICT Policy Support Programme Call 3 objective 1.3 ICT for ageing well / independent living Project start date: 1st April 2010 Duration: 30 months Coordinating partner: SANTER REPLY Spa Published by the inCASA Consortium Project co-funded by the European Commission within the CIP ICT-PSP Programme Date: 09-08-2011 Dissemination Level: Public / Confidential Work package: WP6 Pilot Evaluation Introduction • European Funded Project • 30 month project – April 2010 • Consortium consists of 13 organisations from 8 countries. • inCASA aims to investigate systems to support the frail elderly to remain in their home for as long as possible Pilot Sites Partner Country Setting Size Aim ATC Italy Social 20 Integrate social housing and social services by employing telecare services enabled by inCASA. CHC UK Primary Care 25 To compare variations in the activity template and the variations in the physiological parameters to identify patterns and to understand if and how environmental monitoring can aid or even predict clinical events INSERM France Hospital 30 To detect early signs of alterations or adverse events of cancer treatments, and to make rapid decisions to improve safety of home delivery of cancer chemotherapy in elderly patients KGHNI Greece Hospital 25 To demonstrate substantial prolongation of the time elderly people can continue to be at home, as well as the resulting increased efficiency of the social and health care systems FHC Spain Hospital 30 To promote and monitor rehabilitation exercise at home in order to improve patients’ quality of life. Methodology Approach Challenges • Different Settings – Social / Health • Technology challenges • Levels of Experience • Availability of Resources • Small sample sizes • Project Delays Developing the Minimum Data Set Commonalities •Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics •Frailty Differences •Cultures •Settings •Quality of life •Social Housing •Clinical Outcomes •COPD •CHF •Primary Care •Technologies •3 sites using the same system •Patient Satisfaction •Organisational Changes •Professional Perception •Patient Perception •Hospital •Technologies •Economics Next Steps • Identifying commonalities • Investigating measures • Methodology to be presented to Pilot sites • Commonalities presented and agreed • Site specific measures to be agreed • Agree timescales • Agree monitoring and data collection tools