Download MET Calibration with W+jets / GMSB

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Lepton wikipedia , lookup

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Missing Transverse Energy
Calibration in W/Z(+jets) Events
Jason Nielsen
Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics
University of California, Santa Cruz
UC Davis HEFTI Workshop on Missing Energy Signals at LHC
April 1, 2009
Missing Energy Calibration
• Goals for calibration:
– Resolution (measured for at least one point)
– Linearity (requires at least two points)
– Extrapolation (unknown requirements)
• Z/W (+jet) events provide a known true missing
transverse energy
• Assume for now that any effects of MET on
acceptance can be unfolded/corrected
• Also assume backgrounds are small (Z), or can be
measured in-situ (W)
J. Nielsen
Davis Missing Energy 2009
2
MET Scale from Z(ee) Events
• Define projection axis along
Z momentum
– Note this is anti-parallel to the
hadronic recoil system
• Elong gives measure of
energy scale, Eperp gives
angular resolution
– Find that Elong is the challenge
J. Nielsen
Davis Missing Energy 2009
3
Artificial Z Decays to Neutrinos
• Replace one lepton from Z
by neutrino to simulate W
decay with nonzero MET
• In simulation, true MET is
the ET of removed lepton
• In collider data, will
remove calorimeter
deposits associated with
lepton
J. Nielsen
Davis Missing Energy 2009
4
MET in W Events
• Choice of measuring W
mass or calibrating MET!
• MET smearing does not
completely wash out
sensitivity to W
transverse mass
• Numerical methods for
convoluting mass with
resolution functions
– Resolutions measured in
early W/Z analyses
J. Nielsen
Davis Missing Energy 2009
5
Results from Many Samples
• Check samples with larger true MET: top pairs,
SUSY LSPs, high-mass tau pairs
• These high-MET samples don’t have a “truth” handle
which is known a priori – taken from simulation
J. Nielsen
Davis Missing Energy 2009
6
Extrapolation to Higher Energies
• These data-driven methods are limited to the lowenergy bulk of the MET distribution
• How to get to the 300 GeV regime?
J. Nielsen
Davis Missing Energy 2009
7