* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download abstract
Auditory processing disorder wikipedia , lookup
Hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Auditory system wikipedia , lookup
Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup
EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ EVALUATION OF AUDITORY FUNCTION IN CHILDREN WITH CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE By Essam Aly Mahmoud*and Montaser Abdelsalam Hafez** Departments of ENT and Audiology Unit, *Assiut and **El-Menia Faculty of Medicine ABSTRACT: This study was conducted on 38 children with chronic renal failure all under regular haemodialysis for more than two years. Twenty five normal healthy children served as a control. They were subjected to clinical examination in the audilogy unit in Assiut University Hospital. The examination included otoscopic examination, basic audiological assessment, auditory brain stem response (ABR) and transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE). Twenty patients had bilateral mild high frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Eight had bilateral moderate to severe SNHL and ten had normal hearing threshold . All are subjected to examination 1-2 days before dialysis session. TEOAE and ABR test was carried out for those whose ears has normal hearing threshold . No response in TEOAE (fail) was obtained in 10% of them but none of the control and a partial pass response in 40% versus 10% of the controls (P< 0.001). The mean overall echo-level and reproducibility were significantly lower in patients than in the controls. The overall echo-levels did not correlate with serum urea, creatinine, serum sodium or potassium and also for ABR results. The ABR results showed significantly elongated III, V peak latencies as well as I-III and I-V interpeak latencies compared to the controls. Cochlear dysfunction was mainly at low frequency band. The changes in the ABR reflect sub clinical disturbances in neural conduction of auditory pathway. KEYWORDS: Chronic renal failure Emissions Audiometry ABR. INTRODUCTION: Sensorineural hearing loss occurs in as many as 40% of long term hemodialysis patients with chronic renal failure. Before the advent of haemodialysis and renal transplanttation, uremia patients apparently had no higher incidence of hearing or vestibular loss than the general population. Such problems have been attributed to ototoxic medications, electrolyte imbalance, inadequate dialysis or disease or unknown cause (Bergstrom et al., 1980). Otoacoustic Gatland et al., (1991) studied the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in patients with chronic renal failure and threshold changes following haemodialysis. They found incidence of hearing loss is 41% in the low, 15% in the middle and 53% in the high frequency ranges respectively. They found no correlations between weight changes, haematocric, metabolic bone disease or ototoxic drug history of the patients and changes in hearing threshold level. 239 EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ Bazzi et al., (1995) studied the effect of short term and long term haemodialysis on hearing in patient with chronic renal failure. They found incidence of 61.5% sensorineural hearing loss. There was no correlation between hearing loss and plasma creatinine. Patients with plasma urea >200 mg/dL had higher percentage of hearing loss (86%) than with plasma urea <200 mg/dL (69%). They concluded that hearing loss in children with chronic renal failure was mainly cochlear SNHL. of integrity of the central auditory system is the auditory brain stem response (ABR). ABR yields valuable information about the impulse conduction along the brain stem pathway. Thus, it could be useful in the investtigation of the neuro-otological dysfunction associated with renal failure. Fan et al., (1994) measured brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) in 20 chronic renal failure patients. They found marked increase in wave I, III, V peak latencies and IIII, I-V interpeak latencies and no correlation between plasma protein, hemoglobin, urea, creatinine, serum electrolytes and BAEP measurements. They realized that BAEP could be used as objective index in deciding the inner ear and nervous system damage in chronic renal failure. Nikolopoulos et al., (1997) investigate hearing acuity in young children suffering from renal insufficiency. They reported that SNHL (mainly high-frequency) of unknown cause was found in 30.4% and hearing loss was not influenced by various haematological, biochemical and clinical parameters as blood pressure and history of ototoxic drug administration. However, hearing loss seemed to be affected by the method of management of the renal insufficiency (more in the haemodialysis group than in the peritoneal dialysis). Katedra et al., (2002) investigate the effects of haemodialysis in children at the terminal phase of chronic renal failure (CRF) as a potential factor responsible for SNHL. They examined 20 child with (CRF) before and after dialysis using pure tone audiometry, brain stem evoked potentials (BAEP) and acoustic otoemissions (TEOAE and DPOAE). They found significant SNHL, significantly elongated I, III, V peak latencies as well as I-III and I-V interpeak latencies in BAEP of children with CRF and DPOAE was improved after dialysis in range of frequencies which was absent before. They concluded that ABR and OAEs could reflects the influence of electrolyte disturbances associated with CRF on auditory function. Mancini et al., (1996) investgitated the incidence of SNHL in 68 patients who reached chronic renal failure (CRF) in childhood with aim of identifying possible risk factors. They reported 29% SNHL in patients under conservative treatment, 28% of patients on hemodialysis, and 47% after renal transplantation. Also they found a significant correlation with the administration of ototoxic drugs. The clinical utilization of electrophysiological activities of the auditory system has opened a new era in the ability to diagnose central auditory impairment. The most utilized electrophysiological technique for evaluation Samir et al., (1998) investigate the effects of chronic renal failure in children using transient otoacoustic emission test (TEOAE). They reported cochlear dysfunction at low frequency 240 EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ bands as detected by TEOAE results and that the overall echo-levels of TEOAEs did not correlate with serum urea, creatinine, sodium or potassium. methods for evaluation of auditory function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials: Study group: n= 38 The group consisted of 38 children suffering from chronic renal failure and undergoing haemmodialysis in the pediatric unit for renal failure for more than two years. Their age ranged between 10 and 18 years old and sex distribution was (10 female and 28 male). Hurks et al., (1995) studied auditory brain stem (ABR) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) in children with chronic renal failure. They reported a delay in peak I latency of ABR which is an indication for peripheral conduction dysfunction. There was no differences between the children treated conservatively and those with continuous peritoneal dialysis. Control group: n= 25 Consisted of 25 normal healthy children from those attending the audiology unit with their family. Their age and sex distribution matched those of the study group. Stanvroulaki et al., (2001) studied the effect of chronic renal failure on hearing organ in young patients using distortion product otoacoustic emissions. They found signifycantly lower amplitudes of DPOAE in all frequencies >1184 even in patients with normal pure tone thresholds. They reported that DPOAE seem to be more sensitive to incipient cochlear damage than behavioral threshold in monitoring renal patients. Criteria for selection of the study group: - The study group had the criteria of chronic renal failure as the following : Clinical manifestations as : Pallor (anemia), polyurea, polydipsia, edema, hypertension, vomiting. (Bergstein , 2000) . - Laboratory abnormalities including : Anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, hyperkalemia, hyponatremia And elevated serum urea and creatinin level . - The normal of blood chemistry in normal child age (10-18) was : Serum urea (3.0-5.7) m mol/L Serum creatinine (0.3-0.7)m mol/L Serum sodium (138-145) m mol/L Serum potassium(3.5-6.0) m mol/L (Nelson,2000) . - No history of ear disease or other systemic diseases that cause hearing loss. - Normal otoscopic examination. -Normal blood pressure and heart examination. This study was designed to explore the effects of chronic renal failure on hearing function of young children and the use of otoacoustic emission tests and evoked auditory potentials as auditory brain stem response (ABR) as an objective tests to investigate the disturbances in this function. AIM OF THE WORK: 1- The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of chronic renal failure in children on the cochlea and central auditory pathway specially on the brain stem level and to determine the degree of hearing loss if present. 2- To evaluate the sensitivity of TEOAE and ABR tests as objective 241 EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ B- Methods: The children for the study group were examined once between the dialysis sessions i.e. 1-2 days before the dialysis session. All subjects of the study and control group were subjected to the following: - ENT examination. - Pure tone audiometry (PTA): at active intervals from 250 Hz to 8000 Hz for air conduction and 500 Hz to 4000 Hz for bone conduction. Normal hearing threshold (0-25 dB HTL) Mild hearing loss (26-45 dB HL ) Moderate hearing loss (46-70 dBHL ) Severe hearing loss (71-90 dBHL).(Katz ,1990 ) - Auditory brain stem response (ABR): was performed monaurally using alternating dick at 90 dBnHL intensity level with repetition rate 21:1 puls/second. The absolute latency and interpeak latency value of each tracing was obtained and saved for further analysis. In this study the results were interpreted according to Maxon et al., ,1993 . A response was considered present whenever their was an emission 3dB signal/ noise ratio or above (i.e. 3 dB above noise floor) in any frequency band . According to this classification, the results of TEOAE were interpreted into one of the three categories. Pass: the response was 3 dB or above in each of the tested frequency bands (1,2,3, and 4 K Hz ) . Partial pass: The response was present in at least one of the tested frequency bands. Fail: no cochlear response was present at any of the tested frequency bands. For both ABR and TEOAEs the comparison between both study and control groups were done only for children with normal hearing threshold. - Statistical analysis was performed using t-student test to compare between the study and control group. - The study group children were diagnosed clinically as chronic renal failure and all fulfilled the criteria for renal failure as the laboratory finding for each child were estimated. The following ABR parameters were applied: Click duration: 100 ms Number of sweeps: 2000 Delay: zero Gain: 100 k Low pass frequency: 100 Hz High pass frequency: 3k Sweep time: 12 ms Electrode placement: active on the vertex, reference on the mastoid of the test ear and ground electrode on the other mastoid. - Transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE): Using a stimulus non-linear click of 80 micro second duration. The intensity was adjusted to be approximately 85 dBspl . TEOAE were analyzed during the 20 ms after the stimulus and a total of 26 average on each two buffers (A & B) were stored fore analysis . RESULTS Study group: This group consisted of 38 children with CRE. The results of the study group showed significantly high frequency SNHL ranged from mild to moderately severe. There were 20 child has bilateral mild high frequency SNHL, eight had bilateral moderate to severe SNHL and ten children had bilateral normal hearing threshold. Table (1) showed a statistically significant increase in hearing threshold level at frequencies 2, 4, 8 KHz when compared to control group. 242 EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ Table (1): Comparison of the mean (X) and SD of the study and control groups for average pure tone hearing thresholds of both right and left ears. Frequency 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Study group Mean SD 15 4.08 20 5.41 25 3.90 35 6.12 50 6.19 65 3.15 Control group Mean SD 15 4.05 22 3.21 24 5.10 23 0.34 25 2.56 25 3.41 Results of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: TEOAE was done only for 10 children of the study group, those having normal hearing threshold. Table (2) showed that these was no response in TEOAE (fail) in 10% of the study group but none of the control group and 40% partial response versus 10% Significance P 0.32 0.21 0.25 < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* of the controls (P< 0.001). The results of TEOAE overall response and reproducibility were significantly lower in the study group when compared to the control group (Tables 2 and 3). The lower frequencies of reproducibility were mainly affected Table (2): The percentage of each category of TEOAE in the study and control groups Category Pass Partial pass Fail Total Study group No. 5 4 1 10 Control group % 50% 40% 10% 100% No. 9 1 zero 10 % 90% 10% 0% 100% Table (3): Comparison of TEOAE overall response level, repro ducibility % and reproducibility at each frequency band in the control and study groups. TEOAEs Study group Mean SD Response 7.57 4.16 Whole repro % 66.2 13.4 0.5 KHz 70.4 11.4 1 KHz 60.3 21.2 2 KHz 87.5 16.1 3 KHz 90.5 22.1 4 KHz 75.3 26.2 P< 0.05 significant Control group Significance Mean SD P 19.5 4.51 0.001** 96.7 5.32 0.006** 90.5 16.11 0.04* 80.5 12.4 0.01* 90.7 17.3 0.34 95.3 22.4 0.21 75.2 18.4 0.35 P< 0.001 highly significant 243 EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ Results of auditory brain stem response testing: The results of ABR in the study group were compared only for children with normal hearing threshold . They showed significant delay in the latency of wave III and V, also the interpeak latencies I-III and I-V were significantly delayed when compared to the control group at intensity level 90 dBnHL with RR 21.2. This was shown in Tables from (4) to (7). Table (4): Comparison of the ABR wave latency mean and SD in the control and study groups at 90 dBnHL and RR 21.1 for the right ear. Wave I III V Study group Mean SD 1.55 0.31 4.11 0.25 6.21 0.14 Control group Mean SD 1.41 0.21 3.51 0.22 5.72 0.31 Significance P 0.13 0.001** 0.001** Table (5): Comparison of the ABR wave latency mean and SD in the control and study groups at 90 dBnHL and RR 21.1 for the left ear. Wave I III V Study group Mean SD 1.59 0.25 4.25 0.31 6.12 0.51 Control group Mean SD 1.32 0.41 3.62 0.14 5.82 0.21 Significance P 0.23 0.001** 0.001** Table (6): Comparison of the ABR interpeak latency mean and SD in the control and study groups at 90 dBnHL and RR 21.1 for the right ear. Interpeak Latency I – III I–V Study group Mean SD 2.56 0.25 4.66 0.41 Control group Mean SD 2.12 0.31 4.21 0.25 Significance P 0.01* 0.02* Table (7): Comparison of the ABR interpeak latency mean and SD in the control and study groups at 90 dBnHL and RR 21.1 for the left ear. Interpeak Latency I – III I–V Study group Mean SD 2.66 0.42 4.35 0.43 Control group Mean SD 2.13 0.11 4.12 0.22 244 Significance P 0.05* 0.04* EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ Table (8): Results of correlation coefficient (r) between different audiological parameters and biochemical values measured in the study group . Audiological parameters PTA threshold Average ABR latency For wave V ABR interpeak I-V . OAE response In dBspL Biochemical Measures Na Potassium Blood urea Creatinine Na Potassium Blood urea Creatinen Na Potassium Blood urea Creatinine Na Potassium Blood urea Correlation ( r ) Significance - 0.1917536 0.9913458 -0.3458893 0.6778321 -0.155978 0.1145887 -0.8765127 -0.9845332 0.9112456 0.9983564 -0.8755214 -0.9665231 0.9953126 0.1332876 -0.3466794 Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant No correlations were found between the serum urea, creatinine, sodium or potassium and PTA, TEOAE or ABR findings. DISCUSSION: In this study their were statistically significant difference between the study and control group in pure tone threshold. There were 20 child has bilateral mild high frequency SNHL, eight had moderate to severe and ten had normal hearing threshold level as shown in Table (1). Hearing loss mainly sensorineural type, involving high frequencies 2, 4 and 8 KHz. There were no correlation between hearing threshold level and other factors as blood urea, creatinine or sodium and potassium serum levels. correlated to the duration of dialysis and duration of illness, but single session dialysis appears to had no effect on hearing organ. Also Nikolopoulous et al., (1997) agreed with the results of this study. They investigated hearing acuity in young children and reported mainly high frequency SNHL which is not correlated to various haemological, biochemical and other clinical parameters. Mancini et al., (1996) agreed with the results of this study. They investigate the incidence of SNHL in young children with chronic end stage renal failure. They reported incidence of 29% SNHL in patients with conservative treatment, 28% of patients on haemodialysis and 47% after renal transplantation. These results agreed with results of many studies including Bergstrom et al., (1980), Gatland et al., (1991) and Bazzi et al., (1995); they reported high frequency SNHL in patients with chronic renal failure after dialysis and 245 EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ The results of TEOAEs test showed statistically significant decrease in overall response amplitude and at low frequency bands below 2 KHz (Table 3). These results agreed with the studies on otoacoustic emissions by Katedra et al., (2002) and Samir et al., (1998). They investigated the effect of electrolyte disturbances in children with chronic renal failure on hearing function using EOAEs test to investtigate cochlear function. They reported significant decrease in the amplitude of TEOAE and DPOE in children due to chronic renal failure and that long term dialysis (duration of dialysis) was correlated to the effects on cochlear function. Ozturan et al., (1998) agreed with the results of this study. They used audiometry and DPOAE to investigate the effects of chronic renal failure on hearing. They reported high frequency SNHL, but the acute effect of dialysis has no direct effect on hearing threshold level. Also Gierek et al., (2002) used electrophysiological examinations as (ABR and DPOAE) to test hearing organs in patients under haemodialysis suffering from chronic renal failure. Their results agreed with the results of this study. They concluded that the latency of ABR waves I, III, V and interpeak latency I-V were significantly elongated and DPOAE amplitude also was significantly decrease in patients with chronic renal failure under dialysis for a period of sex months. The results of auditory brain stem response testing showed signifycantly elongated III, V peak latencies as well as I-III and I-V interpeak latencies when compared to the control group. This indicating that chronic renal failure not only affects cochlear function but also results in delayed neural conduction in the brain stem. From this study it was apparent that chronic renal failure in children under regular haemodialysis could results in diminution of hearing affecting mainly high frequency region from 3-8 KHz and both cochlear and brain stem function are affected most probably due to electrolyte disturbances and its effects on cochlear function and nerve conduction along the brain stem. This could be elicited by the changes in ABR findings and TEOAEs test results in this study. These results agreed with the results obtained by Fan et al., (1994) and Kalcolra et al., (2002). They used evoked potential testing as a tool for investigating auditory pathway and they found that chronic renal failure in _hildren leads to significant elongation in wave I, III, V peak latencies and IIII, I-V interpeak latency values and their were no correlations between these findings and plasma protein levels or haemoglobin, urea, creatinine and serum electrolytes. All these results also agreed with the results of this study in which no correlation also were found between TEOAE amplitude decrease or ABR values and that of serum urea, creatinine or sodium and potassium serum levels. CONCLUSIONS: - Chronic renal failure in children under regular haemodialysis results in mild to moderately severe SNHL affecting mainly high frequency region at 3-8 KHz. - Auditory function in children with chronic renal failure was affected at the levels of both cochlea and brain stem and otoacoustic emission, ABR testing could be used as objective tests for evaluation of these changes. 246 EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCES: 1. Bazzi C, Venturini CT, Pagani C, Amjo G and Amico G (1995): “Hearing loss in short- and long term haemodialysed patients”, Nephrology 2. Dialysis Transplantation, Vol.10, Issue 10 ,1865-1868 . 3. Bergestein J. M. (2000): "Chronic Renal Failure" Chapter 543, in Nelson text book of pediatrics, 16 th edition. Behaman, Jenson p.1605-1607 4. Nelson Text Book of Pediatrics: "Laboratory Medicine, Drug therapy and reference tables" Ch 726 Part XXXIV, 16th edition (2000) . 5. Bergstrom LV, Thompson P, Isamu and Raymod P (1980): “Renal disease, its pathology, Treatment and effects on the ear”, Arch Otol., Vol. 106, Sept, 567. 6. Fan YP, Jiang JJ and Qian TS (1994): “Significance of brain stem auditory evoked potential determination in chronic renal failure and maintenance hemodialysis”, Zhongguo Zhong XI YI Jie He Za, Apr., 14 (4): 220-1, 197. 7. Gatland D, Tucker B, Chalstrey S, et al., (1991): “Hearing loss in chronic renal failure – hearing threshold changes following haemodialysis”, J. royal Society of Medicine, V: 84, October, 587-589. 8. Gierek T, Markowski J, Koko F, Paluch J, et al., (2002): “Electrophysiological examinations (ABR and DPOAE) of hearing organ in hemodialysis patients suffering from chronic renal failure”, Otolaryng Pol., 58 (2): 189-94. 9. Hur KXW, Hulstijn D, Pasman J, et al., (1995): “Evoked potentials in children with chronic renal failure, 247 treated conservatively or by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis”, Ped Neph., Jun, 9 (3): 325-8. 10. Mancini ML, Dello Strologo L, Bianchi PM, Tieri L and Rizzoni G (1996): “Sensorineural hearing loss in patients reaching chronic renal failure in childhood”, Pediatr Nephrol., Feb, 10 (1): 38-40. 11. Maxon A et al., (1993): "Feasibility of identifying risk for conductive hearing loss in a new born". Semin Hear, 14, p.173-87 12. Nikolopoulos TP, Kandiloros DC, Segas JV, Nomicos PN, Ferekidis EA, et al., (1997): “Auditory function in young patinents with chronic renal failure”, Clin Otolarngol., Jun, 22 (3): 222-5. 13. Orendor-Fraczkowska K, Makulska I, Pospiech L and Zwolinska D (2002): “The influence of haemodialysis on hearing organ of children with chronic renal failure”, Otolaryng Pol., 58 (5): 597-602. 14. Ozturan O and Lam S (1998): “The effect of hemodialysis on hearing using pure tone audiometry and distortion product otoacoustic emissions”, ORL of Otorhinolayngol Relat., Sept. Nov-Dec, 60 (8): 306-13. 15. Samir M, Riad H, Mahjoub M, Awad Z and Kamal N (1998): “Transient otoacoustic emissions in children with chronic renal failure”, Clin. Otolary., Feb, 23 (1): 87-90. 16. Stavroulaki P, Nikolopoulos TP, Psarommatis I and Apostolopoulos N (2001): “Hearing evaluation with distoration product otoacoustic emissions in young patients undergoing haemodialysis”, Clin Otolaryng, Jun, 26 (3): 235-42. EL-MINIA MED., BULL., VOL. 16, NO. 1, JAN., 2005 Mahmoud & Abdelsalam __________________________________________________________________________________ دراسة حالة السمع عند األطفال اللذين يعانون من الفشل الكلوى المزمن عصام الدين على محمود* -منتصر عبد السالم حافظ** قسم األنف واألذن والحنجرة (وحدة السمعيات) - كلية طب *أسيوط و**المنيا وأجريت هذه الدراسة على عددد 83طفدل يعدانون مدن فشدل كلدوى مدزعمن ويعالجـدـون بواسدطة االستصفاء الدموى المتكرر لمدة تزيد عن عامين .تم إختيار مجموعة حكم مكونة من 02طفدال طبيعيا. طريقة البحث: خضعت مجموعة الدراسة ومجموعة الحكم إلى الفحص اإلكلينيكى الكامل وفحص األنف واألذن والحنجددرة وقيدداس السددمع التقليدددى وكددذلث قيدداس البددث الصددوتى المةددار لدد ذن الداخليددة وقياس الجهد المةار لجذع المخ. وجددد أن األطفددال المصددا بون بالفشددل الكلددوى يعددانون مددن ضددعف سددمعى حسددى عصددبى متوسط أو شديد فى الترددات العالية فقط. تم إجراء الفحوصات السابقة على األطفال قبل إجراء الغسيل الكلوى بيوم أو يومين حتى ال يدخل تأةير الغسيل فى نتاعج البحث. وجد أيضا أن البث الصوتى ل ذن أقدل مدن الطبيعدى وكدذلث بالنسدبة لقيداس الجهدد المةدار لجذع المخ وجد تأةير واضح فدى درجدة توصديل اإلشدارات عدن طريدا جدذع المدخ عندد مقارندة النتاعج لمجموعة الحكم. ةبت مدن هدذه الدراسدة أن الفشدل الكلدوى المدزمن عندد األطفدال يدعدى إلدى ضدعف سدمعى حسى عصبى متوسط أو شديد فى الترددات العالية وكذلث يمكن إستنتاج أن هذا التأةير ناتج عن إصابة األذن الداخلية وتوصديل اإلشدارات عدن طريدا جدذع المدخ وذلدث كمدا يتضدح مدن التدأةير على قياس البث الصوتى وقياس الجهد المةار لجذع المخ. 248