Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Executive Local Government Resource Review Report by: Hugh Grover Date: 23 March 2011 Contact Officer: Hugh Grover Telephone: 020 7934 9942 Summary Recommendations Item no: 5 Job title: Director, Fair Funding, Performance and Procurement Email: [email protected] This paper updates Members on progress and developments since they agreed London Councils’ response to the White Paper ‘Local Growth: Realising Every Place’s Potential’ on 28 October 2010. It reports the formal commencement of the government’s Local Government Resource Review and proposes that detailed further work be undertaken on this with a view to detailed reports being taken to the Leaders’ Committee in May. (1) That the terms of reference for the Local Government Resource Review be noted and the Executive express any views it has on the principles that should guide the development of a response. (2) That officers be asked to develop further work on the implications of the Review for London in accordance with the principles the Executive identifies. (3) That the Chair and other elected officers engage in a discussion on the issues surrounding the Local Government Resource Review for London with the Mayor of London and relevant Advisers. Local Government Resource Review Background 1. On 28 October 2010 the government published a White Paper ‘Local Growth: Realising Every Place’s Potential’. Amongst other matters the White Paper set out the government’s thoughts regarding mechanisms that might encourage local economic growth, particularly covering issues concerning the possible benefits of incentivisation through local retention of the Business Rate. The White Paper also made particular reference to the government considering a range of options, making specific reference to the existence of a ‘London Pool’ prior to 1990. 2. The White Paper also announced that there would be a Local Government Resource Review (LGRR) commencing in January 2011. 3. Members approved London Councils’ response to the White Paper at their 29 November 2010 meeting. The response included the statement: “London Councils offers to work closely with the Government to assist in the design and implementation of a business rate retention model as part of the [Local Government Resource] review. 4. The Terms of Reference for the LGRR have been somewhat delayed but were eventually published on 17 March 2011 (see Annex A for the full Terms of Reference). Members will note that the stated aim of the review is “…to free up as many local authorities as possible from dependency on central government funding, as well as develop better incentives for local authorities to promote economic growth in their areas and to benefit financially from that growth. The first phase of the Review will deliver proposals for reform by July 2011.” Progress Update 5. Since members agreed London Councils’ response to the White Paper, officers have been engaged in considering what characteristics and principles might underpin any possible Business Rates retention model in London. 6. There are understandably many issues and points of detail that present themselves when investigating various options, but it appears to officers that key amongst these are: whether regional pooling and redistribution of business rates (addressing the differential between rates raised and funding need) is viable and desirable; if pooling and redistribution were to be adopted, what would be the basis for assessing funding need; what would a fair and equitable incentive mechanism look like (bearing in mind the different starting positions for different authorities; to what extent could business rates justifiably be expected to fund some elements of regional GLA family activity (for example the formula grant element of funding for LFEPA and the MPA) 7. On the final point, funding regional GLA family activity, officers have engaged in some useful initial discussions with officials at the GLA and have committed to further discussions subject to members’ views on the way forward overall. It would be useful if this could be supplemented by the Chair and other elected officers discussing the review with the Mayor of London and his relevant Advisers. 8. More broadly, the Executive is asked to endorse further development work by officers on response to the Review with a view to this informing further discussions with Executive members and a report to the Leaders’ Committee in May 2010. Recommendations 9. (1) That the terms of reference for the Local Government Resource Review be noted and the Executive express views on the principles that should guide the development of a response. (2) That officers be asked to develop further work on the implications of the Review for London in accordance with the principle the Executive agrees. (3) That the Chair and other elected officers seek a first discussion on the issues surrounding the Local Government Resource Review for London with the Mayor of London and relevant Advisers Financial Implications for London Councils 10. None Equalities Implications for London Councils 11. None ANNEX A LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESOURCE REVIEW: TERMS OF REFERENCE Phase 1 The first phase of the Review will consider the way in which local authorities are funded, with a view to giving local authorities greater financial autonomy and strengthening the incentives to support growth in the private sector and regeneration of local economies. It will look at ways to reduce the reliance of local government on central government funding, increase local accountability and ensure that the benefits of economic growth are reflected in the resources authorities have. The review will include consideration of changes to the business rates system, and focus in particular on: a) the optimum model for incentivising local authorities to promote growth by retaining business rates, whilst ensuring that all authorities have adequate resources to meet the needs of their communities and to deliver the commitments set out in the Spending Review; b) the extent to which these proposals can set local authorities free from dependency on central funding; c) considering how to fund authorities where locally raised funding would be insufficient to meet budget requirements and control council tax levels, as well as councils who do not collect business rates, such as upper tier authorities, recognising that some parts of the country are currently more dependent on government funding; d) reviewing the scope for greater transparency and localisation of the equalisation process; e) the position of councils whose business rate yield would be significantly higher than their current spending; f) how to ensure appropriate protections are in place for business, within a framework of devolving power to the lowest level possible; g) how to deliver Tax Increment Financing proposals against a context of greater retention of business rate revenues; h) how various aspects of the business rate system, including business rate revaluation and reliefs, should be treated; i) examining the scope for further financial freedoms for local authorities, while standing up for and protecting the interests of local taxpayers, and j) the wider implications of rates retention for related policies, including the work of the Commission on the Funding of Care and Support and the Government’s other incentive schemes (the New Homes Bonus and the commitment to allow communities to keep the business rates for renewable energy projects). The Review will take account of the responses made to the questions in "Local growth: realising every place’s potential". It will also conduct extensive engagement with interested parties, including businesses of all sizes, to ensure that all views and perspectives are taken into account. Following the announcements at the Spending Review and through introduction of the Welfare Reform Bill that Government will localise Council Tax Benefit, the Review will also consider the design of the new scheme (to be launched in 2013-14) and what flexibilities local authorities should have to help keep overall council tax levels down. The first phase of the Review will conclude by July 2011, followed by the necessary steps to implement the concluded reforms. Phase 2 The second phase of the Local Government Resource Review will commence in April 2011 and will focus on Community Budgets. It will be taken forward in parallel with the continued roll out of these Budgets. Detailed Terms of Reference will be published shortly.