Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Supplementary Information Detailed description of fabrication steps of the cell-migration chip The fabrication steps for the multi-region cell migration chip are presented in Fig. S1. Fig. S1 Schematic of fabrication steps for cell-migration chip. The dry nanoparticle embedding technique is demonstrated. First, standard photolithography was used to create a SU8 master of the micropillar array. To do this, SU8 3050 (Microchem) was spin-coated on a silicon wafer to a height of 80 µm and soft-baked for 2 minutes at 65ºC and 26 minutes at 95ºC. A Canon PLA-501F mask aligner was then used to contact-align a transparency mask containing the chip design with the wafer, and the SU8 was exposed to 1000 mj/cm2 of UV light. Postexposure bake was conducted for 2 minutes at 65ºC and 6 minutes at 95ºC. The exposed SU8 layer was then developed in a solution of SU8 developer (Microchem) for 6 minutes and hard-baked at 150ºC for 24 hours to obtain the final SU8 micropillar master. A replica-molding technique was employed to obtain a reusable polyurethane (PU) negative from the SU8 master. To do this, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) polymer solution (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) was prepared by mixing the polymer base and cross-linker at a 10:1 ratio. The PDMS solution was then cast on the SU8 master, cured at 70ºC for 6 hours and de-molded to obtain a PDMS negative of the SU8 master. The PDMS negative was then silanized by exposure to oxygen plasma at 700 mTorr for 2 minutes followed by incubation with a hexamethyldisilazane solution (HMDS, Sigma Aldrich) overnight. The silanization step allows the casting of a second PDMS solution on the PDMS negative. A second PDMS solution was then cast on the PDMS negative, cured at room temperature for 24 hours and demolded to obtain a PDMS replica of the SU8 master. Finally, a PU solution (Smoothcast 310, Smooth-on inc.) was prepared at 1:1 ratio, cast on the PDMS master, cured at room temperature for 6 hours and de-molded to obtain the reusable PU negative. Finally, to fabricate PDMS migration chips using the dry nanoparticle embedding technique, masking tape was used to cover parts of the PU mold (PU negative) corresponding to non-magnetic pillar regions on the migration chip (regions 1, 2, 8 and 9) to prevent embedding of magnetic particles in the cavities of those regions. Carbonyl Iron magnetic particles (FeC Powder, Chemical Store inc.) were then applied to the surface of the mold, and a permanent magnet was used to pull the particles into the cavities of the unmasked regions (regions 3, 4, 6 and 7). Excess particles were then removed by wiping off with a cotton applicator. Next, the masking tapes were removed and a PDMS polymer solution was cast on the PU mold and allowed to cure at room temperature. Once cured, the PDMS was de-molded from the PU mold to obtain the final cell-migration chip which has 4 regions with magnetic PDMS pillars, 4 regions with non-magnetic PDMS pillars and a region with flat PDMS. Magnetic actuators used for cell migration experiments a) Permanent magnet actuator Fig. S2 shows images permanent magnet actuator setup that we designed and built for the purpose of micropillar actuation in cell-migration experiments. In this design the flywheel and link convert rotational movement of the motor shaft into a sinusoidal back and forth movement of the magnet holders on the rail guides. Permanent magnets inserted into the magnet holders apply a magnetic field to the migration chips sitting at the bottom of the petri-dishes. Movement of the magnets to and away from the petri-dishes causes the cyclic actuation of the magnetic micropillars on the migration chip at 1 Hz. Fig. S2 Permanent magnet actuator setup used for cell migration experiments. When designing the magnetic actuator setup we took careful consideration to minimize the vibrations induced to the platform from the moving motor and magnets. The design demonstrated in Fig. S2 was chosen for this very purpose. The inertia of the heavy and fully balanced rotating flywheel and the sinusoidal back and forth movement of the carriages, which slow down before changing their direction of travel, minimizes unwanted vibrations and the self-lubricating guide rails minimize friction which eliminates frictional sources of vibration. Furthermore, all moving parts are connected to mounting brackets which are themselves connected to the main base with foam paddings. These foam paddings which act as vibration dampers further impede transferring of any induced vibrations to the culture dishes which house the migration chips. Due to these considerations, in our experiments any influence of platform vibration on cell migration is very minimal if not non-existent. This conclusion was verified by an experiment comparing cell migration rates on migration chips placed on the platform with those of a control chip, i.e., a migration chip placed off the platform but in the same incubator. We observed no significant differences in cell migration rates between the chips b) Electromagnet actuator Fig. S3 shows the custom-made electromagnet actuator, the custom designed and 3Dprinted microchip housing, and the incubated microscope setup used for cell-migration experiments with live imaging. Fig. S3 Electromagnet actuator setup used for cell migration experiments. The 3D printed microchip housing has a glass base which allows for the live imaging of the cells on the migration chip using the inverted microscope. The electromagnet, run by a signal generator and current amplifier, applies a 1 Hz cyclic magnetic field of approximately 200 mT to the migration chip.