Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ANIMALS & ELDERS: TOGETHER FOREVER/RESOURCES By Pea Horsley www.animalthoughts.com GUIDANCE ON GOING PET-FRIENDLY It’s important to get it right! While some care homes do recognise the benefits of pets and accept residents’ animals, rules are often drawn up randomly – making them seem either unfair or illogical – and applied inconsistently. This can lead to problems. Examples of poor practice include: A total ban on pets including visiting dogs still owned by residents A ban on visits from accredited therapy dogs Overly restrictive or illogical rules A ban on cats and dogs – often the most common companion animals One pet per resident, provoking a heart-breaking choice A pet policy will only work well if: It’s unambiguous with clear guidelines and a written agreement that cannot be changed at the whim of a new manager. It offers residents access to good advice and support services (outlined in guidance to housing providers). It’s reviewed regularly, with residents, to ensure their needs continue to be met, and promoted to staff, residents and potential residents. It’s not overly restrictive (ie some schemes insist only ground-floor residents can have pets, yet not every pet needs outside access). Staff members are encouraged to approach problem-solving with a positive, pro-pet attitude – most issues are easily resolved and it’s vital to residents’ wellbeing to get it right. 1 Care facilities should not allow themselves to be made to feel that it’s wrong or irresponsible to have pets in care. Council departments (including environmental health officers) often don’t understand the importance of the human-animal bond or its benefits to residents’ health. They are also often misinformed about the risk of animal-related disease or injury. A Public Health Study looking at 284 nursing homes with pets found that there was only one pet-related incident per 1,000,000 hours and that for every 1,000 nursing home incidents only 4.5 are pet-related while 999.5 are non pet-related. There were no cases of zoonoses or allergies. Fears about MRSA and C.Difficile are unfounded: in fact, MRSA has only been found in a tiny number of animals, none of which were in care homes, and in each instance a human had given the disease to an animal! There appear to be no reported cases of C. Difficile in animals. Pet allergies: simple measures can be taken to reduce exposure to indoor allergens to within tolerance thresholds (more information can be found here http://www.scas.org.uk/human-animal-bond/pets-and-older-people/pets-for-lifecampaign/research-findings/ - and then clicking on the link for the complete copy of the SCAS report; see page 24). Comprehensive guidance on incorporating pets in residential care and drawing up an effective policy is available to housing providers from the following sources: Age Concern, http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/Keeing_pets_good_practice_guide_inf.pdf?dtrk =true Dogs Trust, https://www.dogstrust.org.uk/help-advice/factsheetsdownloads/factsheetpetsandhousing09.pdf The Pet Advisory Committee http://www.petadvisorycommittee.org.uk/sites/default/files/DOG4567_Pet_Advisory_ Council_booklet_low_res_web.pdf Q&As addressing typical concerns for housing providers http://www.scas.org.uk/human-animal-bond/pets-and-older-people/pets-for-lifecampaign/qa-for-care-professionals/ SCAS’s Pet-Friendly Care Kit for housing providers http://www.scas.org.uk/humananimal-bond/pets-and-older-people/pets-for-life-campaign/pet-friendly-care-kit/ 2