Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
HISTORY OF IDEAS IN EVO-DEVO: Ernst Haeckel’s law of recapitulation (ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny) as a case study. February 7th, 2006 Benoît Dayrat School of Natural Sciences University of California, at Merced ________________________________________________________________________ Selected readings (and references therein) on the history of ideas in evo-devo. Books: Amundson R (2005), The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: roots of Evo-Devo, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge Univ. Press. Burian RM (2004), The epistemology of development, evolution, and genetics, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge Univ. Press. de Beer GR (1930), Embryology and Evolution, Oxford, Clarendon Press [after 1 st edition, the title was changed to Embryos and Ancestors] Robert JS (2004), Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: taking development seriously, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge Univ. Press. Schmitt S. (2004), Histoire d’une question anatomique: la repetition des parties [History of an anatomical question: the repetition of parts], Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Articles: Benson KR (1994), Germ layers, Gastraea-theorie, and cell lineage: the emergence of invertebrate embryology and invertebrate zoology from nineteenth century morphology. In Reproduction and Development of Marine Invertebrates, pp. 3-14, Ed. WH Wilson Jr, SA Stricker & GL Shinn, John Hopkins Univ. Press. Brauckmann S & Gilbert SF (2004), Sucking in the gut: a brief history of early studies on gastrulation. In Gastrulation, from cells to embryo, pp. 1-20, Ed. C. D. Stern, Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press. Dayrat B (2003), The roots of phylogeny: how did Haeckel really build his trees? Syst. Biol., 52: 515-527. Guralnick R (2002), A recapitulation of the rise and fall of the cell lineage research program. J. Hist. Biol., 35: 537-567. Hoβfeld U & L Olsson (2003), The road from Haeckel: The Jena tradition in evolutionary morphology and the origins of evo-devo, Biol. Phil., 18: 285-307. Leys SP & D Eerkes-Medrano (2005), Gastrulation in Calcareous sponges: in search of Haeckel’s Gastraea, Integr. Comp. Biol., 45: 342-351. Love A. (2003), Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology, Biol. Phil., 18: 309-345. Love A & R Raff (2003), Knowing your ancestors: themes in the history of evo-devo, Evol. & Dev., 5(4): 327-330. Panchen A (1999), Homology – History of a concept. In Homology (Novartis Foundation Symposium 222), pp. 5-18, Ed. BK Hall, Wiley. Robert JS (2002), How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology? Biol. Phil., 17: 591-611. Sander K (2002), Ernst Haeckel’s ontogenetic recapitulation: irritation and incentive from 1866 to our time. Ann. Anat., 184: 523-533.