Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Katherine Henson, NCRAS, Presentation for London Public Health Knowledge and Intelligence Network meeting,18th February 2016 Introduction • Routes to diagnosis is a national work stream • Categorisation of the route the patient follows to the point of diagnosis • Work stream aim: examine demographic, organisational, service and personal reasons for delayed diagnosis • Work stream includes a report of major resections: proportion of patients who have had surgery to remove a cancer • London viewpoint: • There are unique geographies in London – need to understand the variations • Interest in patients who received a major resection for their tumour -- examine the variation in this key cancer treatment depending on their route to diagnosis 2 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Data sources Uses routinely collected data sources to work backwards through patient pathways to examine the sequence of events that led to a cancer diagnosis: • Hospital Episode Statistics • Cancer Waiting Times • Screening data • Cancer registration data 3 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Description of each route 4 Route Description Screen Detected Detected via the breast, cervical or bowel screening programmes Two Week Wait Urgent GP referral with a suspicion of cancer GP Referral Routine and urgent referrals where the patient was not referred under the Two Week Wait referral route Other Outpatient An elective route starting with an outpatient appointment: either self-referral, consultant to consultant, other referral Inpatient Elective Where no earlier admission can be found prior to admission from a waiting list, booked or planned Emergency Presentation An emergency route via A&E, emergency GP referral, emergency transfer, emergency consultant outpatient referral, emergency admission or attendance Death Certificate Only No data available from Inpatient or Outpatient HES, CWT or Screening and with a death certificate only diagnosis flagged by the registry in the NCDR Unknown No data available from Inpatient or Outpatient HES, CWT or Screening within set time parameters or unknown referral Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 National publications 5 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 6 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Unknown 70% Emergency presentation 70% Inpatient Elective 80% Other Outpatient 80% GP referral 90% Two Week Wait 90% Screening 100% 12-month relative survival 100% All routes Unknown Emergency presentation Inpatient Elective Other Outpatient GP referral Two Week Wait Screening All routes 12-month relative survival Lung Cancer Relative Survival Prostate Cancer Relative Survival 60% 50% 40% 30% 7 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 8 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 9 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 London results 10 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 11 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Routes to diagnosis for all malignant neoplasms (excl. NMSC) by year, persons, London 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2006 12 2007 2008 2009 2010 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2011 2012 2013 Big four cancers 13 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Routes to diagnosis for lung cancer by year, persons, London 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2006 14 2007 2008 2009 2010 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2011 2012 2013 Routes to diagnosis for colorectal cancer by year, persons, London 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2006 15 2007 2008 2009 2010 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2011 2012 2013 Routes to diagnosis for colorectal cancer by year, persons, London 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% Complete roll-out in London 15% 10% 5% 0% 2006 16 2007 2008 2009 2010 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2011 2012 2013 Routes to diagnosis for breast cancer by year, females, London 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2006 17 2007 2008 2009 2010 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2011 2012 2013 Routes to diagnosis for breast cancer by year, females, London 60% Symptomatic TWW introduced 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2006 18 2007 2008 2009 2010 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2011 2012 2013 Routes to diagnosis for prostate cancer by year, males, London 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2006 19 2007 2008 2009 2010 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2011 2012 2013 Variation by demographic factors 20 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Routes to diagnosis for all malignant neoplasms (excl. NMSC) by year and age at diagnosis, persons, London 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Screen detected Two Week Wait GP referral Under 50 21 Other Outpatient 50-59 60-69 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Inpatient Elective 70-79 Emergency presentation 80-84 85+ Death Certificate Only Unknown Routes to diagnosis for all malignant neoplasms (excl. NMSC) by year and deprivation status, persons, London 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Screen detected Two Week Wait GP referral Other Outpatient 1-least deprived 22 2 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 3 Inpatient Elective 4 Emergency presentation 5-most deprived Death Certificate Only Unknown Routes to diagnosis for all malignant neoplasms (excl. NMSC) by year and ethnicity, persons, London 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Screen detected Two Week Wait Asian 23 GP referral Black Chinese Other Outpatient White Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Inpatient Elective Mixed Emergency presentation Other Ethnicity Death Certificate Only Unknown Unknown Major resections 24 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Proportion of patients who underwent a major resection for each route, all malignant neoplasm (excl. NMSC), London, 2006-2013 Percent of patients who underwent a major resection 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Screen detected 25 Two Week Wait GP referral Other Outpatient Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Inpatient Elective Emergency presentation Death Certificate Only Unknown Percent of patients who underwent a major resection Overview of resection proportions for emergency presentation, TWW and GP referral routes, London, persons, 2006-2013 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Emergency presentation 26 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Two Week Wait GP referral London emergency presentation 27 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Emergency presentations for 11 cancer sites by year, persons, London 70% 60% * 50% 40% * 30% 20% 10% * 0% 2006 28 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Bladder Brain Female breast cancer Colorectal Kidney Lung Melanoma Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Ovary Prostate Uterus Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 2013 29 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 30 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Conclusion • Overall trends are similar to the national picture • Number of patients diagnosed through the emergency route has decreased to 23% in 2013, which is in-line with national figures • Biliary tract cancer and cancer of unknown primary most commonly diagnosed through emergency (56%) followed by AML (54%) then brain cancer (53%) in 2013 • Proportion diagnosed as TWW has increased: • 30% diagnosed through TWW and 26% by GP referral in 2013, compared to 18% and 29%, respectively, in 2006 31 • 83% of those diagnosed through screening had a major resection, compared to 12% through emergency presentation (early vs late stage?) • In 11 out of 16 cancer sites, TWW route had the greatest proportion of patients receiving a major resection Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013 Acknowledgements Simon Lewry (LKIS for London) Sam Johnson (NCIN) Isabella Carneiro (NCIN) Anna Fry (NCIN) Thank you! Any questions? Peer-reviewed paper in the British Journal of Cancer Technical document explaining how Routes are calculated National workbooks of updated data NCIN-CRUK Major resection report 32 Routes to Diagnosis of Cancer in London, 2006 - 2013