Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Formulation Formulation Strategies for ‘First-Into-Man’ Studies By Robert Harris at Molecular Profiles Deciding on the best approach for taking a new drug into ‘first-into-man’ studies can be a difficult process – but choosing the right formulation is critical in ensuring that a new drug is given the best possible chance of fulfilling its potential in clinical trials. When a new experimental drug shows great promise in preclinical studies for the treatment of a disease which afflicts millions of patients worldwide, there is one question that raises significant discussion: What type of formulation would be the most appropriate for testing in man for the first time? ‘Phase 1 clinical trials’ is a critical stage in any drug development project and to reach this stage as quickly as possible is of paramount importance, especially for those companies with limited budgets or key investor milestones to meet. Of equal importance is the need to ensure that the new drug substance is administered in a form that will give it ‘the best chance of success’ in early clinical assessment. A poor choice of formulation can lead to poor clinical data, which in turn can lead to re-formulation and a prolonged Phase 1 clinical programme – or even termination of the project. This article will examine the factors that need to be taken into consideration when deciding how best to take a new drug entity into first-into-man studies, and provides a ‘formulation decision tree’ to offer guidance on deciding which formulation strategy to follow for an orally administered drug. the most suitable approach to providing a dosage form for the clinic. More recently, alternative classification systems have been suggested to replace the BCS, since the purpose of the BCS is primarily as a drug development tool to help formulators and sponsors justify requests for biowaivers (2,3).The developability classification system (DCS), which was developed using the BCS as its basis, focuses on intestinal solubility, the compensatory nature of solubility and permeability in the small intestine, and an estimate of the particle size needed to overcome dissolution rate-limited absorption. Observations on test compounds have demonstrated DCS to be of greater value in predicting which factors are critical to in vivo performance compared with the BCS. Another tool used to predict whether a drug molecule will have oral bioavailability in humans is Lipinski’s ‘Rule of 5’ (4).This states that poor absorption of an orallyadministered compound is likely if the compound has a molecular mass greater than 500 Da, high lipophilicity (cLogP greater than 5), more than five hydrogen bond donors and more than ten hydrogen bond acceptors. Defining the Drug Substance One of the primary aims of preclinical studies should be to identify the physicochemical and Keywords biological characteristics of a drug in order to predict oral bioavailability. According to the biopharmaceutics First-into-man studies classification system (BCS), drug Biopharmaceutics substances can be classified into four classification system (BCS) distinct classes based on their aqueous Developability classification solubility and intestinal permeability (1). system (DCS) When combined with the dissolution rate Formulation strategy of the drug and the unit dose required, Particle size reduction this information can be used to decide on 72 If a drug molecule has been predicted to exhibit good oral bioavailability following application of Lipinski’s ‘Rule of 5’ and/or the DCS, then a simple drug-in-capsule or drug-in-bottle unformulated approach could be used. On the other hand, if a drug molecule is predicted to have poor oral bioavailability, alternative formulation strategies will need to be considered. Choosing a Formulation Strategy Having defined a drug substance according to its solubility and permeability, the next step is to select the most appropriate strategy for formulating the drug for Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology Issue 38 iptonline.com use in Phase 1 and possibly Phase 2 clinical trials. Based on the physicochemical and biological characteristics of the drug, different formulation strategies may be applicable. Strategies to consider when formulating a drug for a first-into-man study are summarised in the ‘formulation decision tree’ shown in Figure 1. A popular strategy is to manually add the necessary quantity of the drug substance directly into a capsule or bottle for reconstitution with a suitable liquid prior to ingestion.This simple formulation strategy accelerates progression to first-into-man studies, while also being cost-effective. Specialised dosing equipment can be used to facilitate high precision filling of capsules, particularly when dosing potent drug substances (where the required dose is less than 10mg), or when large quantities of capsules are required to be filled. Figure 1: Formulation decision tree Drug substance Figure: Molecular Review physicochemical and biological data Yes Drug in capsule/bottle No Drug absorption is solubility limited Yes More water soluble salt available? Or No Conventional capsule formulation (powder blend or granules) Use solubilityenhancing vehicle Liquid/semi-solid matrix in capsules (for example, SEDDS or SMEDDS) Yes Although the drug-in-capsule or drug-inbottle approach is time- and cost-efficient, it is not suitable for all types of drug substance. If a drug substance does not ‘wet’ easily, or if its solubility in water is not sufficient, then it may be poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract – and this will influence the pharmacokinetic data obtained. For drug substances that have poor water-solubility and have exhibited poor or variable absorption when tested in animal models, a watersolubility enhancing formulation strategy should be considered for Phase 1 clinical evaluation.There are several such strategies that can be implemented, ranging from particle size reduction to using inclusion complexes such as cyclodextrins.The most commonly used strategies are discussed briefly below. Particle Size Reduction The dissolution rate of the drug substance can be significantly accelerated by reducing the particle size of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Particle size reduction can be efficiently achieved down to 2-10µm through the use of micronising equipment such as fluid energy mills, in which particle size reduction is achieved by collision between the particles at high speed. Over the last 10 to 15 years, the processing of drugs as nanocrystals (<1µm) has rapidly evolved into a reliable drug delivery strategy, enabling the production of formulations with rapid drug dissolution characteristics and enhanced bioavailability after oral administration. Precipitation (‘bottom up’) or wet milling (‘top down’) techniques can be used to produce submicron nanocrystals (5,6). No Reduce particle size (for example, micronise or nano-mill) Conventional capsule formulation (powder blend/granule) Or Drug in lipid-based vehicle in capsule Required dose is soluble in liquid/wax vehicle Melt granulation – using water soluble polymer as binding agent No Required dose is miscible with polymer Or No Solid dispersion (drug dispersed in polymer or self-emulsifying wax matrix) Fill formulation into capsules Yes Drug miscible with polymer at greater than 150ºC Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology Issue 38 Profiles Change salt form Yes Melt extrusion with water-soluble polymer. Mill the extrudate Yes Spray-dry to produce drug-polymer** solid solution or co-precipitate Fill milled extrudate into capsules No Drug and polymer* soluble in common volatile solvent Or Spray solution onto carrier (for example, lactose) and granulate * or cyclodextrin ** or drug-cyclodextrin complex Fill into capsules (blend with excipients if necessary) Solution Capsule Formulations Some drugs can be dissolved in a suitable, pharmaceutically acceptable solvent and the resulting solution can be filled into capsules.The key advantage of pre-dissolving the drug compound is elimination of the initial rate-limiting step of particulate dissolution in the aqueous environment within the GI tract. Nevertheless, this formulation strategy may result in the drug precipitating out of the solution when the formulation disperses in the GI tract, especially in cases when a water-miscible solvent has been used, such as polyethylene glycol. The problem of precipitation on dilution in the GI tract can be overcome if the drug compound is sufficiently lipophilic to dissolve in a lipid vehicle; in such a case, partitioning kinetics will enable the drug to remain in the lipid droplets. An additional advantage made possible by this approach is that lipidic vehicles are usually well absorbed from the GI tract, resulting in significantly improved oral bioavailability compared with administration of the solid drug substance (7,8). However, the ability of individuals to digest lipid-based 73 iptonline.com formulations may cause significant inter- and intrasubject variation in drug uptake. Mixtures of lipidic excipients and surfactants are increasingly being used to produce self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) and self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) for oral administration of drugs exhibiting poor water-solubility (9). SEDDS and SMEDDS formulations act by forming emulsions or microemulsions spontaneously on contact with aqueous media. Both of these types of formulation use pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant excipients to achieve self-emulsification. In this way, emulsification of the lipids in the formulation no longer depend on GI secretions such as bile salts, and therefore inter- and intrasubject variability in drug absorption can be reduced. Solid Solutions and Dispersions Solid solutions are molecular dispersions of drug molecules in a polymer or wax matrix, whereas in the case of solid dispersions, the drug exists in the form of discrete particles dispersed within a polymer or wax matrix – although the terms are often used interchangeably (10).The solid solution strategy employs two separate principles to enhance the water-solubility of a drug: first, conversion of the drug substance into its amorphous state, making it easier for the substance to dissolve; and second, incorporation of the amorphous drug substance in a hydrophilic carrier matrix, such as polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) or polyethylene glycol (for example, PEG 6000). Solid solutions can be prepared either by dissolving the drug directly in molten polymer, or by dissolving both the drug and the polymer in a suitable volatile solvent. When the solvent is removed, an amorphous drug-polymer complex is produced with the drug being trapped in an amorphous state within the water-soluble polymer matrix – thereby enhancing the water-solubility of the drug. The efficiency of this formulation strategy may be impaired if the drug substance is triggered to return to its more thermodynamically stable crystalline state.This can result in the drug compound crystallising in the polymer matrix, which can lead to a deterioration in dissolution properties. Recently, surfactants have been used to stabilise solid solution formulations, avoiding drug recrystallisation and further enhancing watersolubility. In addition, the physical stability of a formulation can be tested by a combination of rapid screening techniques, such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Raman spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography. 74 recently, such methods are being increasingly employed in pharmaceutical applications, having demonstrated their efficiency in preparing several types of dosage form and drug delivery system. HME techniques offer a number of key benefits compared with conventional pharmaceutical processing methods, including the absence of solvents, few processing steps, continuous operation, formation of solid molecular dispersions and improved bioavailability. Dosage forms that have been produced using an HME technique are complex mixtures of active drug, functional excipients and processing aids (11). As well as providing a platform for enhancing drug solubility, HME techniques are also capable of providing sustained, modified and targeted drug delivery, and can be used in various drug delivery applications such as granules, pellets, immediate and modified release tablets, transmucosal and transdermal systems, and implants (12). The HME formulation strategy can be considered an extension to the ‘solid solution’ approach. It requires that a co-melt of the drug substance and a polymer are extruded using a heated screw to produce a solid extrudate; this can then be milled to produce granules for encapsulation or compression into tablets. Producing a melt extruded drug/polymer matrix serves as an efficient method of increasing the water-solubility of a poorly water-soluble drug substance.The efficacy of this approach depends on the miscibility of the drug and polymer substances, and on their exhibiting similar melting points. Melt Granulation Melt granulation is a process by which pharmaceutical powder mixtures are efficiently agglomerated using a water-soluble polymer as a binding agent.The resulting granule blend is heated to a temperature at which the polymer-binding agent softens without completely melting. As a result, aggregates comprised of the drug and excipient are formed.The granule mass is subsequently cooled, sieved and becomes suitable for either filling into capsules or compressing into tablets. Compared with traditional granulation, melt granulation offers several advantages; it does not require the use of water or organic solvents, and elimination of the granule drying stage makes the process more time- and energyefficient (13). As a drug formulation strategy, melt granulation has proved to be an easy, fast and effective technique for enhancing the dissolution rate of several poorly water-soluble drugs (13,14). Hot Melt Extrusion Cyclodextrins Hot-melt extrusion (HME) techniques have been used extensively in the plastics industry for many years. More Cyclodextrins are doughnut-shaped functional excipients with a lipophilic surface on the inside ring and Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology Issue 38 iptonline.com a hydrophilic surface on the outside ring (15).These molecules have been extensively used in pharma formulation owing to their ability to interact with poorly water-soluble drugs, resulting in an increase in their water-solubility.This formulation strategy works by fitting the poorly soluble drug molecule into the inner ring while the outer hydrophilic surface of the cyclodextrin retains the complex in solution.The inclusion complex can be prepared by dissolving the drug and cyclodextrin in a common solvent, or by solidstate mixing of the materials using a high attrition technique, such as ball milling. 4. Lipinski CA et al, Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23: pp3-25, 1997 5. Kesisoglou F et al, Nanosizing – Oral formulation development and biopharmaceutical evaluation, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59: pp631-644, 2007 6. Eerdenbrugh BV et al, Top-down production of drug nanocrystals: Nanosuspension stabilisation, miniturization and transformation into solid products, Int J Pharm 364: pp64-75, 2008 7. Hauss DJ, Oral lipid-based formulations, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59: pp667-676, 2007 Conclusion 8. O’Driscoll CM and Griffin BT, Biopharmaceutical challenges associated with drugs with low aqueous Deciding on the best approach for taking a new drug entity into ‘first-into-man’ studies can be a difficult process. The first vital step is to accurately characterise the drug molecule by investigating and determining its physicochemical and biological characteristics. An appropriate delivery strategy can then be selected according to predictions of the oral bioavailability of the drug. The drug-in-capsule or drug-in-bottle approach is a simple, cost-effective and time-saving dosing strategy. However, it may not be suitable for drug compounds exhibiting poor watersolubility/bioavailability, as is the case for more than 40 per cent of new drug entities. Poor water-solubility represents a major hurdle in achieving adequate oral bioavailability for a large percentage of drug compounds in development. In these cases, a watersolubility enhancing formulation strategy is necessary in order to give the molecule the best chance of success in clinical evaluation. Different formulation strategies can be implemented based on the characteristics of the specific drug molecule; for example, lipid-based formulations are able to facilitate GI absorption of many poorly water-soluble drugs. The preparation of solid dispersions and solid solutions, as well as the use of melt granulation techniques, can also increase water solubility significantly. References 1. FDA Guidance for Industry, Waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on a biopharmaceutics classification system, August, 2000 2. Wu CY and Benet LZ, Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system, Pharm Res 22: pp11-23, 2005 3. Butler JM and Dressman JB, The developability classification system: application of biopharmaceutics concepts to formulation development, J Pharm Sci 99: solubility – the potential impact of lipid-based formulations, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60: pp617-624, 2008 9. Pouton CW and Porter CJH, Formulation of lipid-based delivery systems for oral administration: Materials, methods and strategies, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60: pp625-637, 2008 10. Vasconcelos T et al, Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugs, Drug Discovery Today 12: pp1,068-1,075, 2007 11. Crowley MM et al, Pharmaceutical applications of hot-melt extrusion: Part 1, Drug Dev Ind Pharm 33: pp909-926, 2007 12. Repka MA et al, Pharmaceutical applications of hotmelt extrusion: Part 2, Drug Dev Ind Pharm 33: pp1,043-1,057, 2007 13. Yang D et al, Effect of the melt granulation technique on the dissolution characteristics of griseofulvin, Int J Pharm 329: pp72-80, 2007 14. Passerini N et al, Preparation and characterisation of ibuprofen-poloxamer 188 granules obtained by melt granulation, Eur J Pharm Sci 15: pp71-78, 2002 15. Brewster ME and Loftsson T, Cyclodextrins as pharmaceutical solubilizers, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59: pp645-666, 2007 Robert Harris, PhD, CChem, FRSC, is Director, Early Development, at Molecular Profiles (Nottingham, UK). He joined the company in 2010 and leads the pharmaceutical development services team which is responsible for integrating preclinical chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC), solid state form optimisation and formulation development for early clinical trials through to the end of Phase 2. Rob has 30 years’ experience in product development of both commercial and investigational medicinal products with blue chip and contract pharma companies. During his career, he has successfully managed the development of over 50 new chemical entities. Email: [email protected] pp4,940-4,954, 2010 Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology Issue 38 75