Download SMART SENSOR WEB THE SMART APPROACH

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
ALL HAZARD APPROACH
Level of Preparedness
Raising the Overall Level of Preparedness
WMD
Infrastructure
Hurricane
Fire
Mass
Casualty
Frequency of Type of Incident
UCI Company Proprietary
1
Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5
Management of Domestic Incidents
“To prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from
terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies,
the United States Government shall establish a single,
comprehensive approach to domestic incident
management. The objective of the United States
Government is to ensure that all levels of government
across the Nation have the capability to work
efficiently and effectively together, using a national
approach to domestic incident management. In these
efforts, with regard to domestic incidents, the United
States Government treats crisis management and
consequence management as a single, integrated
function, rather than as two separate functions. “
UCI Company Proprietary
2
Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5
Management of Domestic Incidents
“The Secretary shall develop, submit for review to the Homeland
Security Council, and administer a National Incident
Management System (NIMS). This system will provide a
consistent nationwide approach for Federal, State, and local
governments to work effectively and efficiently together to
prepare for, respond to, and recover from domestic
incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity. To
provide for interoperability and compatibility among Federal,
State, and local capabilities, the NIMS will include a core set of
concepts, principles, terminology, and technologies covering
the incident command system; multi-agency coordination
systems; unified command; training; identification and
management of resources (including systems for classifying
types of resources); qualifications and certification; and the
collection, tracking, and reporting of incident information and
incident resources.” UCI Company Proprietary
3
What is IMS?
•
•
•
•
•
Boilerplate - rules of the game
A toolbox - “Use what you need!”
Common terms
Bottom up decision making
Effective resource allocation
UCI Company Proprietary
4
Who Does IMS Apply To?
FIRST RESPONDERS
• Typically considered Fire, Police,
Paramedic, Emergency Medicine, Public
Health
• New concepts include convergent response
• Generally consists of first organized
response
UCI Company Proprietary
5
Actions of civilian responders
•
•
•
•
•
Stumble into the mayhem
Hopefully recognize the problem
Apply limited resources
Scream for help
Locals act as “speed bumps.” (J. Denney, LAFD)
UCI Company Proprietary
6
Convergent Players
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Utility companies
Postal and express delivery services
Meter readers and inspectors
Transit – Buses and taxis
Public works crews
Private security and volunteer watch groups
Real estate agents
UCI Company Proprietary
7
Incident Management Systems
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Urban Fire IMS
Wildland Fire IMS
Emer. Medical IMS
Law Enforcement IMS
Public Works IMS
Hospital Emer. IMS
National Interagency
Incident Mgmt. Sys.
UCI Company Proprietary
8
Basic principles
•
•
•
•
Function driven
Span of control< 5
Inter-agency model
Effective resource
allocation
• Information sharing &
group decision making
UCI Company Proprietary
9
The CNN factor
The big dog will eat;
you can feed him,
or he’ll go through
your garbage!
“Embedded Reporter”
UCI Company Proprietary
10
IMS/DoD Integration
• Unified command – both parties share the
sandbox
• DoD integration at the section level
(operations, logistics, planning)
• DoD units team with strike teams, task
forces, or units (ex: CBIRF with Haz Mat)
• Any combinations of the above
UCI Company Proprietary
11
Presidential Strategy
• HLS – build and oversee national system
for incident management
• State/local adoption requirement for Federal
funding
• Essential Requirements:
–
–
–
–
Standard incident management system
Interagency planning
Wireless communication interoperability
Local threat assessment and notification
UCI Company Proprietary
12
The Big Four Revisited
1.) Joint operations – IMS/C3I integration;
national ICS all-hazard overhead teams
2.) Common Operational Picture – Coordination
with Northern Command; Access 250
3.) Planning and sustainability – DoD planning
model integrated into IMS; national cache
system with national contracting model
4.) Training – Required integrated/coordinated
with common exercise objectives
UCI Company Proprietary
13
Information Operations (IO)
• Most agencies are
clueless!
• What does the
community have to
know?
• Our infrastructure is a
“house of cards.”
• Websites are “wide
open”
• We need standards,
guidance, and training.
UCI Company Proprietary
14
WTC Communications
•
•
•
•
Very complex incident
Command destroyed
Mass officer fatalities
Confused situational
awareness
• Com incompatibility in
every U.S. region
UCI Company Proprietary
15
D.C. Police Experience on Sept. 11
• OPM closed federal offices but never
notified Metro (D.C.) Police
• Metro Police got alerts from CNN
• Local officials were out of position and
could not move due to traffic
• All comm was overloaded or failed
• The 50 year old EBS system was never used
UCI Company Proprietary
16
UCI Company Proprietary
17
UCI Company Proprietary
18
The New Threat Warning System
• National level
threat advisory
system
• Warnings are not
threat and location
specific
UCI Company Proprietary
19
Threat Warning System
• Purpose
– To standardize knowledge and response to
various threat levels
– To allow various communities and
organizations to have a “common operational
picture” of the situation
• Replaces ad-hoc alert levels and status
UCI Company Proprietary
20
Threat Warning System
• Low Condition (green)
– Low Risk of Attack
– Actions include
• General training and review of plans
• Maintenance of response capability
• Practice Institutional Response
Procedures
UCI Company Proprietary
21
Threat Warning System
• Guarded Condition (Blue)
– Possibility of generalized terrorist attack
• No specific threat
• No specific target
– Actions include
• Check communications with emergency
resources
• Review and update emergency procedures
• Provide public with information to assist in
their preparedness
UCI Company Proprietary
22
Threat Warning System
• Elevated Condition (Yellow)
– Significant risk of terrorist attack
• No specific targets but possible specified threat
– Actions include
• Increase surveillance of critical locations
• Coordinate emergency plans as appropriate with
nearby jurisdictions
• Assess whether specific threat requires modification of
plans
• Implement, as appropriate, contingency and
emergency operations plans
UCI Company Proprietary
23
Threat Warning System
• High Condition (Orange)
– High risk of terrorist attacks
• Specific Threats
• Specific Targets
– Actions include
• Coordinate necessary security efforts at all levels of
government
• Take additional precautions at high vulnerability, high
risk venues
• Prepare to execute contingency emergency procedures
• Restrict access, as needed, to threatened facilities
UCI Company Proprietary
24
Threat Warning System
• Severe Condition (Red)
– Severe Risk of Terrorist Attack
• Credible, specific evidence
• High reliability of data
• Corroboration of information
– Actions include
• Increasing staff and personnel to emergency levels
• Assigning and deploying emergency response personnel
and deploying teams and equipment
• Monitoring, redirecting or constraining transportation
• Closing public and government facilities
UCI Company Proprietary
25
After The Anthrax Scares
•
•
•
•
•
•
The FBI said, “Quit calling us.”
The fire guys said, “Quit calling us.”
The Police picked up the slack.
No training
No protocols
No equipment
UCI Company Proprietary
26
COMMUNICATION
THREAT TYPES
•
•
•
•
HAZMAT
Blast/Burn
Mass Casualty
Infrastructure
Almost all incidents are combinations of two
or more of the above
UCI Company Proprietary
27
COMMUNICATION
PRIORITIES
• LIFE
• PROPERTY
• ATTRIBUTION
UCI Company Proprietary
28
COMMUNICATION
OTHER ISSUES
•
•
•
•
Classification and security
Incompatible radios and commo gear
Differences in methodology and CONOPS
Who’s in charge and does what?
UCI Company Proprietary
29
Anthrax Lessons
Decision Making without Data
• Need to make decisions rapidly in the
absence of data
• Access to subject matter experts was limited
• No “textbook” experience to guide response
• Understanding of “risk” evolved as outbreak
unfolded
• Need coherent, rapid process for addressing
scientific issues in midst of crisis
UCI Company Proprietary
30
Northern Command
• New command since
September 11
• Responsible for the
CONUS
• Assets loaned from
other DoD commands
• Integrates with local
responders
UCI Company Proprietary
31
Integration – Coordinating with
Other Agencies
• Multiple emergency operations centers
(EOC)
• When do you set up a local EOC?
• Beware of multiple command posts!
• Mobile communications units are not
always compatible
UCI Company Proprietary
32
National Caches
• Regional
• Centralized ordering and Control System
• Incorporates push and pull logistics
strategy
• Applicable for counter terrorism and other
response caches
UCI Company Proprietary
33
Pharmaceutical Supplies
• Presently based on JIT (just-in-time)
inventory practices
• Most hospitals and EMS services have only
a two day supply
• DHHS/DHS presently working on national
pharmaceutical cache system
UCI Company Proprietary
34
Quote of the Briefing
“Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.”
Arthur C. Clark
UCI Company Proprietary
35
RESPONSES
TECHNOLOGY
•
•
•
•
NO R&D dollars in civilian first response community
Must leverage existing resources
Difference between system and technology
Recognize difference in missions and requirements
– Electronic Warfare
– Reliability
• Needs MUST drive technology, not other way
around
UCI Company Proprietary
36
HLS C2 ACTD Vision
To define, refine and transition technologies
and concepts of operations that significantly
increase DoD Homeland Security
responsiveness in consequence management,
crisis response, deterrence and intelligence
coordination.
UCI Company Proprietary
37
Recommended Focus
Crisis response… Request for assistance – Strategic,
Operational, and Tactical
Consequence management… Request for support -Strategic,
Operational, and Tactical
Training… Embedded self- training simulation package
Common Relevant Operational Picture development
•Land, Maritime, Air, MACA domains
•Web-based
•Geo-spatially referenced
•Multi-level security
•Automated Response Data Processing
Assured redundant conductivity, voice, data, collaboration
•Voice to text
•Text to voice
UCI Company Proprietary
38
Problem Statement




Communications interrupted
DoD insight was very limited
Limited Intelligence sharing
Slow Command, Control, and Coordination
between
DoD and
Civil authorities
UCI Company
Proprietary
39
Lessons Learned
• Interoperability
– Continued work is needed to provide data and application
integration for time-sensitive situational awareness, command,
control, and coordination
• Situational Awareness
– Better methods to extract and disseminate sensor data for
visualization and alerting
– Improve and automate the responder’s ability to recognize and
navigate available IT services
• Assured Connectivity
– Quicker, easier configuration of communications equipment
– Rapid deployment of wideband communications
• Information Assurance and Security
– Improve protection of critical command, control and
coordination links between all civil and federal responders
UCI Company Proprietary
From April 2002, Crisis
40
Response Demonstration
HLS TECHNOLOGY
•Communications
– Assurance
– Reliable
– Bandwidth enhancement
– QoS
– Interoperability
•Network tools
– Privacy
– Security
•Visualization tools
•Collaboration tools
•Planning and management applications
•Modeling tools
•Reporting toolsUCI Company Proprietary
41
Summary
• Threats are NOT magic!
• Neither is the technology to combat them!
• The user is the final say and expert, not the
marketer or technology developer
• No technology is a solution unto itself; they all
require doctrine: The two together must be
assessed and are a SYSTEM!
• Consider the mission as a system, not in
isolation
• Use minimum technology necessary to get job
done- we are not here to play with toys!
• Technology must be driven by needs, never
drive them
UCI Company Proprietary
42
MOST IMPORTANT!
• NO TECHNOLOGY IS A PANACEA!
– NOTHING replaces well trained and capable
personnel
– Every technology must have a doctrine for
use along with it, otherwise it is useless, and
can cost lives
– Doctrine/need must drive technology, not be
driven by it
UCI Company Proprietary
43
NOTHING REPLACES WELL
TRAINED, COMPETENT AND
MOTIVATED
PROFESSIONALS!
NOTHING!
PEOPLE ARE THE MOST
IMPORTANT ASSET
UCI Company Proprietary
44