Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
UK leasing industry views on the IASB’s Leases Exposure Draft 5 November 2010 • Overview of the UK asset finance market • Why businesses use asset finance • Winchester Business School findings on use of asset finance by FTSE companies • Case for change • Implications of IASB’s proposals • Is this the best solution? Finance and Leasing Association UK Asset Finance Market • In 2009, £20 billion of investment finance to businesses and public sector • About a quarter of all fixed capital investment excluding property • Majority of all debt-financed business investment excluding property • Market includes banks, independent asset finance companies, captives • Used by around 750,000 UK businesses Finance and Leasing Association Why businesses use asset finance • Conserve cash • Align cost of equipment with revenue generation • Transfer risk in the second-hand value of the equipment • Transfer administration of equipment including re-selling • Transfer maintenance of equipment Finance and Leasing Association Winchester Business School findings on use of operating leases by FTSE companies & implications • £153 billion operating leases in 260 companies • FLA estimate therefore £220 billion across FTSE companies • Average £445 million per company property, £18 million non-property (4%) • 10 companies, not included in averages, have £25 billion of non-property operating leases: BA, BT, C&W, TUI, Vodafone, Arriva, EasyJet, First Group, Stagecoach, Go Ahead • Changes not ‘merely a bookkeeping exercise’ Finance and Leasing Association Case for change • High value off-balance sheet – but mostly property • 10 companies accounting for 88% of non-property • No evidence of deliberate manipulation • Excluding property, and 10 companies, a very minor problem! • Technical / theoretical correctness versus pragmatism? Finance and Leasing Association Implications of IASB’s proposals • High preparation costs: Around 75 regulatory steps requiring significant new information • Dangerous myths: IT panacea, lessor panacea, ‘simple leases’, averages • Fundamental review of leasing tax • Fundamental review of public sector capital accounting • Possible reduced lending due to capital requirements • (Even) longer notes to accounts • Would investors prefer the new information? • Would the new information be remotely predictable? Consequences if not? Finance and Leasing Association Summary – is this the right solution? • Even if it was technically robust (next presentation)…. • More complex financial reporting - preparers and users – conflict with FRC / ICAEW recommendations and Government’s commitment to reduce regulation • Risk of lower supply and lower demand – damaging to business investment • Damage greatest if filters through to SMEs through UK GAAP / IFRS for SMEs • Entirely disproportionate and damaging for non-property • Much simpler, more pragmatic alternative needed Finance and Leasing Association