Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
List of decisions of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina wikipedia , lookup
Remedies in Singapore constitutional law wikipedia , lookup
Constitution of Venezuela wikipedia , lookup
United States constitutional law wikipedia , lookup
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union wikipedia , lookup
Constitution of Hungary wikipedia , lookup
Constitution of Lithuania wikipedia , lookup
Constitution of Chad wikipedia , lookup
Constitutionality Day Welcome speech by the President of the Constitutional Court, Mag. Miroslav Mozetič Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, 18 December 2014 Distinguished President of the Republic, Mr Borut Pahor, President of the National Assembly, Dr Milan Brglez, President of the National Council, Mr Mitja Bervar, President of the Supreme Court, Mr Branko Masleša, and other representatives of the judiciary, Judge at the European Court of Human Rights Dr Boštjan M. Zupančič, Judge at the Court of the European Union and President of the Third Chamber, Dr Marko Ilešič, Judge of the General Court of the European Union, Mr Miro Prek, distinguished Ombudsman Mrs Vlasta Nussdorfer, distinguished representatives of other constitutional institutions, distinguished representatives of religious communities, distinguished Professor Dr Marijan Pavčnik, distinguished Dean of the Faculty of Law in Ljubljana, Prof. Dr Miha Juhart, the leaders of the parliamentary groups, I would especially like to welcome the former judges of the Constitutional Court. 2 And of course, I also wish to welcome all the others whose names I did not mention here. I wish to extend a warm welcome to everyone present here, at the solemn session of the Constitutional Court in honour of the Constitutionality Day. I would particularly like to welcome the President of the European Court of Human Rights, Mr Dean Spielmann, who has kindly accepted our invitation to deliver a speech at the celebration of the Constitutionality Day. I am deeply honoured to welcome you among us today. But before I give the floor to Mr Spielmann, let me share with you some thoughts about this celebration. Distinguished guests, This year again, as many times before, we are celebrating the Constitutionality Day, but not as a memento that 23 years ago, a year after the plebiscite decision in favour of an independent state, we adopted a new Constitution, but as a reminder, a reminder of the commitment that we took on by adopting a new Constitution. With the proclamation of the independence and sovereignty and the adoption of the Constitution, we were supposed to start building something new – a new social order based on the respect for and protection of human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms, the principles of the state governed by the rule of law, all with the purpose of guaranteeing a free and just society. It is no coincidence that the representatives of all three branches of power are gathered here today, the Ombudsman, representatives of the legal profession, or rather teachers of several generations of lawyers, and representatives of civil society. I can safely say that on this occasion we are gathered here as those or the representatives of those who were (are) most responsible for the implementation of constitutionality in our Slovenia. Of course, each within his or her own competences. One can argue with the general belief that our reality is far from the glorious principles enshrined in the Constitution only intentionally, with cynicism, by covering one's eyes and ears. It is enough to open any news media, be it newspaper or any other media. All, so to speak, compete to show things as true-to-life as possible or as most graphic as possible, sometimes even by means of exaggeration. Make no mistake; this is not intended to be a criticism of the media. I believe that they are just holding us a mirror. 3 If this is done in good faith and if the mirror does not lie (as it usually does not), then it is our turn to answer the question of whether we have really done everything we were obliged to do within our competences in order to achieve to the highest degree possible what we are obliged to achieve by the Basic Constitutional Charter on the Sovereignty and Independence and the Constitution, and, last but not least, whether we have done what we swore to achieve when taking up our duties. If I try to provide an answer regarding the Constitutional Court: I am sure that the Constitutional Court accomplished its mission to the fullest extent possible, namely the tasks of the highest and ultimate guardian of the Constitution and the guardian of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the state. When hearing such statements, we are much used to saying that it could have been even better, that more could be done. It is true, it is in fact probably always possible to be better and do more. However, there are limitations imposed by the fact that we are merely human beings and I am sure that the Constitutional Court reached those limits. To confirm this statement, I will present just a few numbers (further details in this regard will be discussed in the annual report, which will be presented to the public early next year). In this manner, we have received by 15 December this year 1,210 different applications, 950 of which were constitutional complaints and 242 of which were petitions and requests for the review of consistency of regulations and 19 of which were requests for resolving the jurisdictional disputes. These are the applications with which we, the judges, are dealing. During this period, we have solved 1,180 cases. In doing so, we decided on the merits, that is adopted a decision, not an order, in more than 60 cases; half of these cases were constitutional complaints and the other half were decisions reached in the proceedings for the review of the constitutionality or legality of regulations. There are 930 different applications from the previous years that still need to be decided. This clearly shows that the vast majority of petitions and requests were rejected or not accepted for consideration by the Constitutional Court, and that the vast majority of the constitutional complaints were rejected or not accepted for consideration. With regard to these cases, it should be noted that these decisions were not taken without due diligence and that none of the cases was decided by just a single judge. Therefore, any arbitrariness or favouritism on behalf of an individual judge is excluded. 4 With regard to the Constitutional Court as a guardian and interpreter of the Constitution and the guardian of human rights and fundamental freedoms, it is the substantive decisions, decisions of the Constitutional Court on the merits, that are, of course, of particular interest. As I said, there were more than 60 such decisions adopted in the past year. The range of legal issues discussed is wide. We thus assessed the constitutionality or legality of the provisions of a series of statutes, such as the Real Property Tax Act together with the Real Property Mass Appraisal Act, Personal Income Tax Act, Tax Procedure Act, Civil Procedure Act, Enforcement and Securing of Civil Claims Act, Free Legal Aid Act, Court Fees Act, Spatial Planning Act, Minor Offences Act, Roads Act, National Assembly Elections Act, Protection of Documents and Archives and Archival Institutions Act, Electronic Communications Act and Police Act. With regard to the review of the Banking Act, we have for the first time submitted a preliminary question to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The range of constitutional values and principles and human rights and fundamental freedoms that we have safeguarded through our decisions is also broad. These run the gamut from the basic principles of the state governed by the rule of law and the social state, the constitutional guarantees in various judicial proceedings, to the right to compensation (Article 26), prohibition of torture (Article 18), presumption of innocence (Article 27), protection of personal liberty (Article 19 ), protection of human personality and dignity (Article 21), right to personal dignity and security (Article 34), protection of privacy and personal rights (Article 35), protection of communications (Article 37), protection of personal data (Article 38), as well as rights to social security and health care, and rights of persons with disability. I would particularly like to emphasise that, when interpreting human rights and fundamental freedoms, the Constitutional Court does not base itself only on the Constitution, but always takes into account also the international instruments binding on Slovenia, including in particular the (European) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, comprising also all the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, and more recently increasingly also the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 5 The judiciary in general, and the Constitutional Court is no exception, namely experiences criticism that is sometimes justified, but often unjust, in particularly very generalized and superficial, as well as criticism without any underlying arguments. Therefore, I thought it was necessary to present you with some concrete data that show the efforts made by the Constitutional Court for the protection of constitutionality. I will not judge the regular courts. However, I am sure that I can state in the name of all of the judges of the Constitutional Court that we carry out our duties professionally and honestly, that in our decisions we are looking for what is constitutionally right and just, that we tend to interpret the law humanely and to this end we always use the basic premise of our Constitution, that is human dignity, as our starting point. Let me conclude with a statement from the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Recognition of the rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. And this is also underlined by our Constitution. Thank you for your attention and I hope everyone enjoys the holidays ahead of us.