Download Can Yeast Cells Simulate HUMAN TUMOR CELLS FOR

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
CAN YEAST CELLS SIMULATE HUMAN
TUMOR CELLS FOR CHEMOTHERAPY
RESEARCH?
LAUREN PEASE
ACADEMY OF NOTRE DAME
GRADE 10
1
QUESTION
Can different species of yeast simulate human
tumor cells for chemotherapy research?
This experiment will test if yeast can
metabolize the chemotherapy drugs Xeloda
and 5-Fluorouracil.
2
RATIONALE
 At least 31% of the 6,000 genes found in yeast cells are also found
in human cells
 Previous experimentation has shown that Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
a species of yeast, can imitate human cells because the same genes
that control its cell cycle and that malfunction in tumor cells, occur
in around the same amount in human cells
 An experiment conducted by David Botstein, a researcher at
Stanford, led him to conclude that “What is true for yeast is also
true for human (Pines, 2008) .”
 This experiment tested that theory to determine if yeast cells can
metabolize chemotherapy drugs as human tumor cells can
3
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
 Xeloda (capecitabine) is an orally administered chemotherapy drug, most
commonly used to treat metastatic breast and colorectal cancers
 It is a prodrug which means it must be enzymatically converted to its active form
 The active form of Xeloda is 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) which is also a prodrug
 For Xeloda to convert to its active form, three enzymes must be present:
enzymes carboxylesterase, cytidine deaminase, and thymidine phosphorylase
 The conversion from Xeloda to 5-FU is a three step process
 The final enzymatic reaction in which 5'-deoxy-5'-fluorouridine is converted to 5FU by thymidine phosphorylase, is highly active in tumor tissue which is one
reason why tumors can be treated with Xeloda.
 Lastly, the active drug, 5-FU is converted in a final catabolic step to
fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate, fluorodeoxyuridine triphosphate, and
fluorouridine triphosphate for incorporation into RNA and DNA
 All steps must take place for the yeast to metabolize the drug which would result
in inhibition of growth
4
HYPOTHESIS
If minimum inhibitory concentration assays are taken of
Xeloda and 5-Fluorouracil, then both will be able to
metabolize the drugs to their active form and incorporate
them into their DNA and RNA.
If Xeloda and 5-Fluorouracil, are compared, then the 5Fluorouracil will inhibit more yeast growth than the Xeloda.
5
MATERIALS
 Colony of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
 Colony of Candida albicans
 Colony of Candida glabrata
 Colony of Candida krusei
 Colony of Candida guilliermondii
 Colony of Candida lusitaniae
 Colony of Tricherosporon asahii.
 Petri dishes
 Microdilution assay plate
 Gloves
 Goggles
 Sharpie
 Lab coat
mg
 5-Fluouracil 1.68 microliters
 Spectrophotometer
 Incubator at 35℃.
 Pipettes
 Bunsen Burner
 Vortex
 RPMI-1640 28 mL
 34 microliters of Dimenthol Sulfoxide
 34 microliters of sterilized water
 Camera (to take pictures)
 Paper (to print assay results)
 Weighing Paper
 1 Xeloda (capecitabine) capsule 500
6
PROCEDURE
 Put on goggles, gloves, and lab coat.
 Prepare the Xeloda stock by transferring one capsule into a test tube.
 Light the Bunsen Burner and sterilize a metal spatula.. Then crush the pill
into small pieces.
 Weigh one small piece of the broken pill using weighing paper.
 Measure 34 µLof sterilized water and 34 µL of dimenthol sulfoxide (a
universal solvent) into a new test tube, and allow the weighed piece to
dissolve.
 Seven species of yeast were used in this experiment: Candida albicans,
Candida glabrata, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida krusei, Candida
guilliermondii, Candida lusitaniae, and Trichosporon asahii.
7
 Prepare the liquid medium of each yeast by adding 1 mL of RPMI-1640 to
7 different glass test tubes and labeling them accordingly.
 Take each Petri dish, flame the inoculating loop in the Bunsen burner, take
a small piece of a yeast colony, and carefully place it into the RPMI at the
bottom of the correctly labeled test tube.
 Vortex the tube to ensure it is mixed and opaque-looking.
 Dilute each liquid medium further by adding 2.5 mL of RPMI to new,
plastic, labeled tubes.
 Transfer .60 µL of the yeast medium into the new tubes for further
dilution.
 Using an electronic pipette, transfer 100 mL of each yeast to each well in
columns one, two, and three, but wells “A” get 200 mL.
 Repeat for each yeast giving three columns for each species.
8
 Using a pipette, add 8 µL of Xeloda to the first well in the first column. In
every second column for each yeast species, add .5 µL of Xeloda to the first
well, and for every third column, add .21 microliters of 5-FU to the first well.
 Use a multichannel pipette to create a serial dilution by transferring dilutions
from one row to the next.
 Leave the last row without any drug for a control and dispose of the last 100
µL.
 Put the assay plate into a bag and put it in the incubator which is set at 35℃.
 Lastly, clean everything up by placing materials into appropriate biohazard bins.
 After 24 hours, a spectrophotometer will be used to read each assay.
9
PHOTOS
10
VARIABLES
 Independent- the concentration of drug tested on each species of
yeast
 Dependent- how much yeast grows in each well
 Control- the last row of wells that has only grown yeast and no
drug
 Constants1. The temperature of the incubator (35˚C)
2. Pipettes
3. Same stock of Xeloda and 5-Fluorouracil
11
DATA
12
13
14
GRAPH
15
16
CONCLUSION
 Hypothesis was partially supported
 It was originally hypothesized that if minimum inhibitory concentration assays were
taken of Xeloda and 5-Fluorouracil, then both would be able to metabolize the
drugs to their active form.
 This was rejected because no concentration of Xeloda was able to inhibit yeast
growth by 50% or more
 It was also hypothesized that if Xeloda and 5-Fluorouracil, were compared, then the
5-Fluorouracil would inhibit more yeast growth than Xeloda.
 This was supported because the 5-fluorouracil was able to inhibit yeast growth by
over 50% compared to the control whereas the Xeloda had no impact upon the
growth of yeast.
 The results show that overall, yeast cells cannot effectively represent human tumor
cells because they were unable to metabolize the Xeloda, a trait which cancer
specific tumor cells have demonstrated.
17
FINAL CONCLUSION
 A source of error in this experiment was that although 7 concentrations of drug
were tested on each species, one one serial dilution was tested per drug
 Also, the assay plates were read within 18-24 hours after they were completed,
however it is possible that the 6 hour range could have affected how much growth
was read by the spectrophotometer
 If this experiment was repeated more trials and more precise reading times would
be necessary
 These results are valuable to the field of oncology
 This data shows that yeast contain some of the same enzymes as tumor cells which
is why they were able to convert 5-FU to its active form
 Further research could potentially find a species of yeast that contains all 3
enzymes required to convert Xeloda to fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate,
fluorodeoxyuridine triphosphate, and fluorouridine triphosphate
18
REFERENCES
 5-FU [Fact Sheet]. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2011, from Scott Hamilton website: http://www.chemocare.com/BIO/fu.asp
 A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002306/
 Antimetabolite [Definition]. (2011). Retrieved October 20, 2011, from Encyclopedia Britannica website:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/28188/antimetabolite
 Antioxidants and Cancer Prevention: Fact Sheet [Fact Sheet]. (2004, July 28). Retrieved October 8, 2011, from NAtional
Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health website:
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/prevention/antioxidants
 Blinkhorn, R. J., Adelstein, D., & Spagnuolo, P. J. (1989, February). Abstract. Emergence of a new opportunistic pathogen, Candida
lusitaniae. Abstract retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC267283/
 Candidiasis. (2009, December 8). Candidiasis. Retrieved December 29, 2011, from
http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/candidiasis-000030.htm
 Cantón, E., Pemán, J., Sastre, M., Romero, M., & Espinel-Ingroff, A. (2006, June 5). Abstract. Killing Kinetics of Caspofungin,
Micafungin, and Amphotericin B against Candida guilliermondii. Abstract retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1538680/
 Capecitabine [Fact Sheet]. (2011, April 19). Retrieved October 8, 2011, from http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB01101
 Capecitabine (Xeloda) [Fact Sheet]. (2010, December 1). Retrieved October 8, 2011, from Macmillan Cancer Support
website:
http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Cancerinformation/Cancertreatment/Treatmenttypes/Chemotherapy/Individualdrugs/Capecit
abine.aspx
 Clark, R. A., Levine, R., & Snedeker, S. (2005, March 18). The Biology of Breast Cancer [Fact Sheet]. Retrieved October 8, 2011,
from Cornell University website: http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/factsheet/general/fs5.biology.cfm
19
 Diasio, R. B., & Harris, B. E. (1989, April 16). Clinical pharmacology of 5-fluorouracil. Public Medicine, 16(4). Retrieved
from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2656050
 Doctors Responses. (1999, October 14). Retrieved October 20, 2011, from Medicine Net website:
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=10736
 Ebright, J. R., Fairfax, M. R., & Vazquez, J. A. (2001, September 1). Abstract. Trichosporon asahii, a non-Candida yeast that
caused fatal septic shock in a patient without cancer or neutropenia. Abstract retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11477533
 Fidel, P. L., Jr.,Vazquez, J. A., & Sobel, J. D. (1999). Candida glabrata: Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Clinical
Disease with Comparison to C. albicans. American Society for Microbiology. Retrieved from
http://cmr.asm.org/content/12/1/80.full
 Gilard,V., Desmoulin, F., Malet-Martino, M., & Martino, R. (2002). METABOLISM OF CAPECITABINE, AN ORAL
FLUOROURACIL PRODRUG: 19F NMR STUDIES IN ANIMAL MODELS AND HUMAN URINE. Drug Metabolism and
Disposition, 30(11), 1222-1229. Retrieved from http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/content/30/11/1221.full.pdf
 Hernday, A. D., Noble, S. M., Mitrovich, Q. M., & Johnson, A. D. (Eds.). (2010). Genetics and Molecular Biology in Candida
Albicans. Retrieved from http://johnsonlab.ucsf.edu/sj/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/sdarticle-149.pdf
 Kurtz, J. E., Dufour, P., Bergeat, J. P., & Exinger, F. (2004, September 14). Abstract. Saccharomyces Cerevisiae as a Genetic
Model in Anticancer Therapy. Retrieved from http://www.benthamscience.com/cppm/Sample/cpg3-1/001AF.pdf
 Metastatic Cancer [Fact Sheet]. (2011, May 23). Retrieved October 20, 2011, from National Cancer Institute website:
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Sites-Types/metastatic
 Midgley, R., & Kerr, D. J. (2008, October 21). Capecitabine: have we got the dose right? Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.
Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nrclinonc/journal/v6/n1/full/ncponc1240.html
20
 Nobles, S. M., & Johnson, A. D. (2007). Abstract. Genetics of Candida albicans, a diploid human fungal
pathogen. Abstract retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17614788
 Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Gibbs, D. L., Newell, V. A., Nagy, E., Dobiasova, S., . . . Barton, R. (2008,
February). Abstract. Candida krusei, a multidrug-resistant opportunistic fungal pathogen: geographic and
temporal trends from the ARTEMIS DISK Antifungal Surveillance Program, 2001 to 2005. Abstract
retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18077633
 Pines, M. (2008). Yeast Researchers Get a Head Start. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from Howard
Hughes Medical Institute website: http://www.hhmi.org/genesweshare/a110.html
 Pray, L. (2008). L. H. Hartwell’s Yeast: A Model Organism for Studying Somatic Mutations and Cancer.
Retrieved October 20, 2011, from Scitable website: http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/l-hhartwell-s-yeast-a-model-808
 Raz-Pasteur, A., Ullmann, Y., & Berdicevsky, I. (2011, June 13). Abstract. The Pathogenesis of Candida
Infections in a Human Skin Model: Scanning Electron Microscope Observations. Abstract retrieved from
http://www.isrn.com/journals/dermatology/2011/150642/
 Roshan, A. S., Janaki, C., & Parveen, B. (2009). Abstract. White Piedra in a Mother and Daughter, 140-
141. Abstract retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938578/
 Sood, S., Pathak, D., & Rishi, S. (2006). Abstract. Urinary tract infection by Trichosporon asahii, 24(4), 294-
296. Abstract retrieved from http://www.ijmm.org/article.asp?issn=02550857;year=2006;volume=24;issue=4;spage=294;epage=296;aulast=Sood
21