Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SKAA 3012 TITLE AND CODE : Group No.: Lecturer Name: Student Name: Group Members Name: Date of Experiment: Date of Report Submission: Assessment (please see overleaf for assessment rubrics) Scores: C2 Proof of Submission C3 C4 A3 FKA.GP.PPM.01 Rubrics for Lab Report Assessment Rating C2: Introduction C3: Data Collection and Recording C4: Analysis (Calculations and Results) A3: Discussion/ Conclusion Excellent 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are sufficiently provided and the report are very well organized. Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are available but not completely provided. The report still well organized. Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is still reasonable well organized Summarize procedure and purposes of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is poorly organized. Data collected is clearly written and appropriately tabulated; Data is within the expected norms. Data collected is improperly tabulated (units missing) or the data deviates appreciably from the expected norms. Some data is missing and / or data deviates drastically from the expected norms. Data is poorly organized or grossly incomplete All required calculations are present and performed correctly; Results (with % error where appropriate) are clearly stated. All required calculations are present but minor errors are present in the calculations; Results section is incomplete (i.e. % error values are reported without the values they refer to). Some calculations are missing and / or there are significant errors in the calculations. Calculations are grossly incomplete and / or incorrect. All assigned questions (if any) are answered and discussed appropriately. Discussion of results shows a strong grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab. All assigned questions are answered and discussed lightly. Discussion on results needs some refinement but shows a reasonably strong grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab. Some assigned questions are answered. Discussion on results does not identify appropriate concepts, needs significant work and / or show a weak grasp of concepts. All assigned questions are not answered. Discussion on results is inappropriate for the lab and shows a lack of comprehension of scientific concepts. Lecturer’s Assessment