Download Front Page of Report skaa 3012

CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
SKAA 3012
TITLE AND CODE :
Group No.:
Lecturer Name:
Student Name:
Group Members Name:
Date of Experiment:
Date of Report Submission:
Assessment (please see overleaf for assessment rubrics)
Scores:
C2
Proof of Submission
C3
C4
A3
FKA.GP.PPM.01
Rubrics for Lab Report Assessment
Rating
C2:
Introduction
C3: Data
Collection and
Recording
C4: Analysis
(Calculations
and Results)
A3:
Discussion/
Conclusion
Excellent
4
Good
3
Fair
2
Poor
1
Summarized procedure
and purpose of work
with relevant
background information
are sufficiently provided
and the report are very
well organized.
Summarized procedure
and purpose of work with
relevant background
information are available
but not completely
provided. The report still
well organized.
Summarized
procedure and
purpose of work with
relevant background
information are
missing. Report is
still reasonable well
organized
Summarize
procedure and
purposes of work
with relevant
background
information are
missing. Report is
poorly organized.
Data collected is clearly
written and
appropriately tabulated;
Data is within the
expected norms.
Data collected is
improperly tabulated
(units missing) or the
data deviates
appreciably from the
expected norms.
Some data is missing
and / or data
deviates drastically
from the expected
norms.
Data is poorly
organized or grossly
incomplete
All required calculations
are present and
performed correctly;
Results (with % error
where appropriate) are
clearly stated.
All required calculations
are present but minor
errors are present in the
calculations; Results
section is incomplete
(i.e. % error values are
reported without the
values they refer to).
Some calculations
are missing and / or
there are significant
errors in the
calculations.
Calculations are
grossly incomplete
and / or incorrect.
All assigned questions (if
any) are answered and
discussed appropriately.
Discussion of results
shows a strong grasp of
the scientific concepts
covered by the lab.
All assigned questions
are answered and
discussed lightly.
Discussion on results
needs some refinement
but shows a reasonably
strong grasp of the
scientific concepts
covered by the lab.
Some assigned
questions are
answered.
Discussion on results
does not identify
appropriate concepts,
needs significant
work and / or show a
weak grasp of
concepts.
All assigned
questions are not
answered.
Discussion on
results is
inappropriate for the
lab and shows a lack
of comprehension of
scientific concepts.
Lecturer’s
Assessment