Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Rahul C S et al: Orthodontic Pontics CASE REPORT Orthodontic Pontics: Smile ‘Through’ the Path to Beauty C. S. Rahul1, Binu Purushothaman2, Rasool Karim Nizaro Siyo3, Naseem K T4, Sreesan5 1- Postgraduate Student, Department Of Orthodontics, K.M.C.T Dental College, Calicut, Kerala. 2- Professor and Head, Department Of Orthodontics, K.M.C.T Dental College, Calicut, Kerala. 3-Professor, K.M.C.T Dental College, Calicut, Kerala. 4- Reader, K.M.C.T Dental College, Calicut, Kerala. 5- Senior Lecturer, K.M.C.T Dental College, Calicut, Kerala. Correspondence to: Dr. C. S. Rahul, Postgraduate Student, Department Of Orthodontics, K.M.C.T Dental College, Calicut, Kerala. Contact Us: www.ijohmr.com ABSTRACT In an era in which adults seeking orthodontic treatment are on the rise, aesthetic treatment is a prerogative. Realization of an attractive smile after culmination of orthodontic treatment is the aspiration of all patients, but many of them display concern regarding their smile during treatment. The presence or appearance of a large edentulous space due to a missing or impacted tooth can be demoralizing to the patient, especially if it affects the smile. Maintenance of space during fixed orthodontic treatment is also of prime importance if the prosthetic replacement of the missing tooth is planned. In an appearance conscious patient use of orthodontic pontics as space maintainers is a good option during treatment. This article tries to showcase the advantages of an orthodontic pontic, the method of placement of the same with the help of case reports. KEYWORDS: Adult orthodontics, pontics, aesthetics AA INTRODUCTION aaaasasa sss All patients expect a beautiful smile at the end of orthodontic treatment, but most are also concerned with their appearance while undergoing treatment. Smaller brackets, lingual or “invisible” brackets, self ligating brackets, aesthetic archwire, plastic brackets and translucent ceramic brackets1 are all modifications of the original fixed orthodontic appliance made by different manufacturers to cater this demand of patients. In an era in which adults seeking orthodontic treatment are on the rise, aesthetic treatment is a prerogative. It is not very unusual for a patient with orthodontic treatment needs, to have missing anterior teeth2. In some patients, extraction of an anterior tooth with poor prognosis would have been carried out even before the commencement of orthodontic treatment. Some of these cases can be managed by orthodontic space closure alone. However in others, replacement of missing teeth with prosthesis may be necessary. In such clinical scenarios, pre-prosthetic orthodontic treatment is mandatory to aid in restorative treatment by repositioning the teeth for the optimal aesthetic and functional results. It is important to maintain the aesthetics of these individuals undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic pontics3 provide a quick fix solution for these patients. CASE REPORT ORTHODONTIC PONTICS: Orthodontic pontics are acrylic teeth used as temporary prostheses during fixed appliance treatment in patients with missing teeth in the smile zone. It can be used in space of any missing teeth. It is particularly useful when multiple or bilateral anterior teeth are missing. Fabrication3, 4: The following are the steps for fabrication of orthodontic pontics. 1. Colour matching- The colour of the acrylic tooth ought to be matching to the colour of adjacent natural tooth. 2. Mesiodistal width determination – When only a single anterior tooth is missing, mesio-distal dimension of the pontic can be determined by taking into account, the width of the contra-lateral natural tooth. In cases were teeth are bilaterally missing, the mesiodistal dimension of the pontic should be determined by considering the space available and the dimensions of the remaining natural teeth. 3. Occluso-gingival height determination- The gingival end of the pontic should contact the soft tissue along a smooth contour. Failure of the pontic to touch the gingival margin results in a negative space between the pontic and the gingiva which hampers the aesthetics, especially in patients with a high smile line. The incisal edge/tip of the pontic should be in concordance with the adjacent natural tooth for optimal aesthetics. 4. Trimming: While trimming not only the cervical portion but the whole gingival surface buccolingually should be contoured to the shape of the ridge. This can help prevent rotational movement of the pontic on round archwires. 5. Accurate bracket positioning: Mark the incisal margin of the bracket on the acrylic tooth by ligating the unbonded bracket to the archwire in place in the mouth. This step is done chair side after the required trimming. 6. Bonding the bracket on the acrylic tooth How to cite this article: Rahul CS, Purushothaman B, Siyo RN, Naseem KT. Orthodontic Pontics: Smile ‘Through’ Path to Beauty. Int J Oral Health Med Res 2016;2(5):109-111. International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research | ISSN 2395-7387 | JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2016 | VOL 2 | ISSUE 5 109 CASE REPORT Rahul C S et al: Orthodontic Pontics 7. 8. Try in- The pontic should be held in the edentulous space with an instrument before ligation to examine the eventual result. Final trimming/reshaping can be done to obtain the optimum aesthetic result. Ligation- ligature wire or elastic module can be used for securing the pontic to the archwire. Tight ligation using ligature wire yields the greatest stability. Play between the arch wire and bracket slot should be minimal. The reduction of play can be achieved by having a figure of 8 consolidations to both mesial and distal teeth of the pontic. Case No: 1: A 23 year old female patient presented with a chief complaint of missing tooth in maxillary anterior region with a history of avulsion following trauma (Figure 1). Treatment plan was to align both the arches with fixed appliance mechanotherapy (MBT 0.022’’slot), prosthetic replacement of right lateral incisor with implant. The space for the implant prosthesis was maintained with the use of orthodontic pontics which improved the patient smile during the pre-restorative phase (Figure 2, 3). She had a pleasing profile (Figure 4), Angles Class II molar relationship with missing maxillary left lateral incisor, diastema between maxillary centrals, and moderate crowding in the mandibular anterior region (Figure 5, 6). Non-extraction treatment was planned. Treatment objectives were closure of midline diastema, regaining the space for prosthetic replacement of lateral incisor, relieving the crowding and maintaining the existing Class-I molar relationship. Figure 4: Extraoral views Figure 5: Lateral ceph and OPG Figure 1: Extraoral and intraoral view Figure 6: Intraoral views The malocclusion was treated with fixed mechanotherapy (MBT, .022″). Alignment and levelling of maxillary and mandibular arches was accomplished and space for the lateral incisor was created (Figure 7). Orthodontic pontics Figure 2: ligated pontic in place Figure 7: After space regaining and pontic try in Figure 3: OPG after placing implant drill and post implant placement Case No: 2: A 20 year old female reported to the Department of Orthodontics with chief complaint of space between her upper front teeth region. She had no history of any tooth extraction and orthodontic treatment. Figure 8: Pontic in place during treatment International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research | ISSN 2395-7387 | JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2016 | VOL 2 | ISSUE 5 110 Rahul C S et al: Orthodontic Pontics were prepared, trial and adjustment was done, and ligated to the rectangular archwire by stainless steel ligature (Figure 8). The smile of the patient showed considerable improvement after ligating orthodontic pontics (Figure 9). CASE REPORT prostheses are some of them7. It is of utmost importance to preserve the esthetics of an orthodontic patient, especially those demanding for invisible/lingual or cosmetic appliances. Orthodontic pontic can be considered as an aesthetic aid for these kinds of patients8, 9, 10. This procedure can be easily performed by the dentist in his office as requires no special skill and armamentarium. This article provides information on fabrication and ligation, uses and placement of orthodontic pontics with the help of two case reports. CONCLUSION Orthodontic pontic can be considered as an aesthetic aid for the orthodontic patients with missing one or more anterior teeth. It helps to improve patient’s aesthetics and smile during orthodontic treatment. REFERENCES Figure 9 smile with and without orthodontic pontics DISCUSSION Benefits of using orthodontic pontics: Enhancement of aesthetics during orthodontic treatment. Prevention of development of deleterious habits such as tongue thrusting and defective speech Maintainence of exact mesiodistal width of the missing tooth for further prosthetic replacement Midline matching along with orthodontic pontic is easier when unilateral incisor is missing. Improvement of psychosocial status of the patient. Dentists often come across patients with missing teeth or malformed teeth. Treatment options include either orthodontic space maintenance/opening for future restoration or orthodontic space closure. A tooth with poor prognosis will have to be extracted prior to orthodontic treatment. When this situation occurs in the anterior region and the treatment plan calls for maintaining or opening the space the esthetics during treatment can be a compromised.5 Most adults seek orthodontic treatment either to improve aesthetics or to improve occlusal function.6 There are numerous factors which have elevated the interest in adults for orthodontic treatment. The availability of an array of aesthetic/cosmetic appliances and a heightened desire for treatment of dental mutilation problems using orthodontics and fixed restorations rather than removable 1. Russell JS. Aesthetic orthodontic brackets. J Orthod. 2005 Jun; 32(2): p. 146-63. 2. Peter, M , Roth, et a. Congenitally missing lateral incisortreatment. J. Clin. Orthod. 1985; 4: p. 258-62. 3. Jena AK, Chandrashekar BS, Duggal R. Riding Pontics: An Esthetic Aid in Orthodontics. The Orthodontic Cyber J. 2007 Sep. 4. Sarabjeet S, Sandhu N. Clinical strategies and multiple functions of riding pontics: A tool to keep patients smiling. The Orthodontic Cyber J. 2011 March. 5. Sabri R. Management of missing maxillary lateral incisors. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Jan; 130(1): p. 80-4. 6. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthoodntics. 5th ed. 7. Graber , Vanarsdall , V. Orthodontics: Current principles & technique. 4th ed. 8. Preeti B. Esthetic Management of Missing Lateral Incisor during Orthodontic Treatment- A Case Report. The Orthodontic Cyber J. 2010 july . 9. Sharma N S. Riding Pontic: A Tool to Keep Patients Smiling. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013; 6(2): p. 127-131. 10. Sarabjeet S, Navreet ,. GG. Use of riding pontics for traumatised anteriors- An Orthodontic Aproach. Dentistry. 2011 January-February; 29. Source of Support: Nil Conflict of Interest: Nil International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research | ISSN 2395-7387 | JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2016 | VOL 2 | ISSUE 5 111