Download Biofilm Growth in Rat Water Bottles

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
Biofilm Growth in Rat Water Bottles
Liz Ericson, Stephanie Fisk, Terri Lechtenberg, & Matt Lucas
Introduction
This past term, it was discovered that the rats used in our senior research had a “slime” growing in their water bottles. This
slime was on both the glass and plastic bottles. The “slime” decreased the water quality and caused the researchers to consider
outside variables in the water. The researchers began to wonder whether or not there were harmful microorganisms or toxins in
the water.
A study found in Applied & Environmental Microbiology, indicated that most bacteria found in water bottles were
proteobacteria and mostly harmless (Schmeisser, et al, 2003). Another study found in the same journal concluded that after only
a single cell attached to the surface, an entire independent microcolony can develop (Martiny, Jargensen, Albrechtsen, & Arvin,
2003). This leads to the production of a biofilm. A biofilm is defined as “an assemblage of microbial cells that is irreversibly
associated (not removed by gentle rinsing) with a surface and enclosed in a matrix of primarily polysaccharide material”
(Donlan, 2002). The rate of growth in aqueous mediums is dependent on pH, nutrients levels, ionic strength, and temperature
(Donlan, 2002). Based on these characteristics, it is hypothesized that there is a biofilm growing in the water bottles.
Materials and Methods
Three plastic water bottles that had been used in the rat experiment were obtained. These water bottles were washed, rinsed,
and bleached. They were filled with approximately 450 ml of tap water. Two plastic coverslips were placed in each water
bottle. The water bottles were then inverted and placed in a rat cage (with live rat). One week later, the plastic coverslips were
removed. The slides were stained with DAPI according to the procedures found in the lab manual. The coverslips were then
viewed under an Olympus fluorescent microscope. Images were captured at 40x and 100x.
Results
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figures 1, 2, and 3 -- (40x) -- These are fluorescent micrographs of the biofilm growing on the rat water bottles. The green
is the bacteria and the blue is the “slime” produced.
Conclusion
There are microorganisms present in the rat water bottles. They produced a
“biofilm” that was visible under fluorescent microscopy. We were not able
to determine what type of bacteria these were. The numbers were higher in
some water bottles than in others, possibly indicating an unknown variable.
References
Donlan, R.M. (2002). Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces. Emerging Infectious
Diseases. [Electronic Version] Retrieved from the World Wide Web on
March 23, 2004 fromhttp://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/
vol8no9/pdf/02-0063.pdf
Figure 4 -- (100x) -- A more magnified
view of one of the bacteria.
Martiny A.C., Jargensen, H., Arvin, E., & Molin, S.A. (2003). Long-Term Succession of
Structure and Diversity of a Biofilm Found in a Modified Drinking Water
Distribution System. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 69, 6899-6906.
Schmeisser, D., et al. (2003). Metagenome Survey of Biofilms in Drinking-Water Networks.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 1298 - 1310.