* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Advanced Treatment of Shale Gas Fracturing Water to Produce
Survey
Document related concepts
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Sewage treatment wikipedia , lookup
Freshwater environmental quality parameters wikipedia , lookup
Camelford water pollution incident wikipedia , lookup
Water quality wikipedia , lookup
History of water supply and sanitation wikipedia , lookup
Water testing wikipedia , lookup
Secondary treatment wikipedia , lookup
Water pollution wikipedia , lookup
Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products wikipedia , lookup
Wastewater discharge standards in Latin America wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Advanced Treatment of Shale Gas Fracturing Water to Produce NPDES Quality Water Project Fact Sheet Program 2011 Unconventional Resources Project Number 11122-57 Start Date April 2013 Duration 37 Months RPSEA Share $1,838,831 Cost Share $525,345 Prime Contractor Southern Research Institute Participants M2 Water Treatment; BKT United Contact Information Principal Investigator Corey Tyree Southern Research Institute Project Manager Sandy McSurdy NETL [email protected] 412-386-4533 Kent Perry RPSEA [email protected] 281-725-1252 Reports and Publications www.rpsea.org/projects/11122-57 Research Objectives Flowback and produced waters from hydraulic fracturing typically contains high levels of dissolved and suspended solids, hydrocarbons, and metals. These contaminants preclude the reuse of this volume for additional fracturing or discharge without treatment. Southern Research Institute (SRI) and its partners are developing a novel and cost effective method for treating natural gas wastewaters for disposal/reuse to promote environmental stewardship, preserve the favorable economics of gas shale development, and make it possible for producers to continue shale gas development. The project objectives are to determine if an integrated approach using magnetic ballast clarification (MBC), vortex-generating (FMX) and nano-filtration (NF) membranes, and hydrogel media or precipitation/solidification/stabilization can: 1. Produce water suitable for national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) discharge and/ or beneficial reuse pursuant to state regulations. 2. Produce a brine slurry with metal concentrations below detection; and 3. Volumetrically decrease the metals waste to be disposed of and solidify/stabilize solid wastes for subsequent disposal. Approach SRI is addressing the above objectives through a series of bench-scale simulations, onsite field research/ testing, and a feasibility analysis. The objective of the bench-scale simulations is to develop a method to allow for a quick evaluation as to whether waters from a specific well are amenable to treatment with MBC, membranes, and/or hydrogel media or precipitation/solidification/stabilization. Field demonstrations will be performed to assess the technologies at a scale that will provide efficacy data for future fullscale design and engineering. The feasibility analysis will bring together the technical, economical, and environmental data to further assess the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed integrations compared to conventional treatment technologies. Accomplishments Bench-scale experimentation was focused primarily on treatment of wastewaters from Bakken and Eagle Ford shale plays. Preliminary results for MBC, FMX, and integrations of the two systems are favorable with respect to all of the primary contaminants of interest with respect to NPDES standards as well as industry water reuse quality specifications. Field trails began in late July and were completed on August 2015. Seven batches of produced water from seven different wells were treated with aeration, to remove iron, and then either the clarifier treatment, membrane system or both. Either of the technologies evaluated, MBC or FMX (NF or UF), are separately able to treat produced or flowback waters sufficiently to meet common criteria for re-use. Future Plans Final report has been submitted for review. Significant Findings The use of MBC or FMX, separately or in combination, to treat water to re-use standards appears to be cost effective compared to baseline use of 100% fresh water for well completion and down-hole disposal of wastes as is common practice at present. This is true for either Marcellus, Barnett or Eagle Ford type scenarios, but the payback is much more evident where down-hole disposal is not locally available. RPSEA www.rpsea.org NETL www.netl.doe.gov 121715