Download Spectral Induced Polarisation (SIP)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup

Power electronics wikipedia , lookup

Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Spectrum analyzer wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Superheterodyne receiver wikipedia , lookup

Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup

Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Equalization (audio) wikipedia , lookup

Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup

Bode plot wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Interferometric synthetic-aperture radar wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
TECHNICAL SUMMARY SHEET NO. 18
Spectral Induced Polarisation (SIP)
Induced polarisation (IP) is a comparatively new geophysical technique. IP effects were first reported
as early as 1912, and the method has been in use since the late 1940s. IP is used primarily for mineral
exploration, and is also being developed as a tool for geothermal, hydrological and environmental
applications. There are several types of IP techniques, but essentially IP is an extension of traditional
resistivity surveying. The ground is characterised not only by its resistivity, but also by its
chargeability (how well it holds electrical charge). In spectral induced polarisation (SIP), the ground
is further characterised by how it reacts to electrical currents at different frequencies. More
information about IP methods is given by Reynolds (2011).
Principles of operation
The IP and SIP methods involve passing a current through the ground through two current electrodes
(‘C’) and measuring a voltage across two potential electrodes (‘P’). The same configurations of
electrodes, or arrays, can be used as in resistivity surveying, but the most popular are the dipoledipole and pole-dipole arrays (Figure 1). Greater depth of investigation can be achieved by
increasing the distance between the electrodes.
a
I
na
n=1
a
x
increasing x
V
1
I
V
n=2
I
2
n=3
I
V
n=4
‘C’ pair
3
V
‘P’ pair
4
n
Figure 1: Reading geometry for SIP surveying using the dipole-dipole array. Left: Electrode
positions on the ground. Right: Plotting positions for each x,a,n combination.
When a current is injected into the ground, the ground charges up, or polarises, like a capacitor.
When the current is turned off, the induced charge takes a finite time to dissipate. The time taken for
the charge to build up (or dissipate) varies not only with the chargeability of the ground, but also with
the frequency of the applied current. In IP and SIP surveying, non-polarisable electrodes are used
(electrodes that do not retain any charge) so that all the signal observed comes from the ground itself.
IP and SIP surveying can be carried out in vertical sounding, horizontal profiling or 2D and 3D
tomography modes. In spectral IP, measurements are taken using input currents with a range of
frequencies between 0.3 and 4 kHz. The magnitude of the induced voltage (VO) and the time delay
(alternatively phase lag or phase angle, φ) between the applied current and the induced voltage is
recorded for each frequency.
The resistance (R) is calculated for each frequency using Ohm’s law (V=IR). The voltage used to
calculate the resistance is VO. The resistance value resulting from this calculation is specific to the
spacing of the electrodes; to obtain a unit value of resistivity (ρ) the effects of electrode geometry are
corrected using a standard geometric factor. The resultant resistivity value is a non-geometric
average of the resistivity of the volume of ground sampled, called the apparent resistivity (ρa).
Processing
In SIP, the resistivity and phase lag responses are plotted against the frequency; this plot is the
diagnostic IP response spectrum. The resistivity and phase behaviours over the frequency range is
described as the relaxation of the electrical system.
www.reynolds-international.co.uk
1
© RIL 03/2011
TECHNICAL SUMMARY SHEET NO. 18
Several models have been developed to describe the relaxation using a small number of diagnostic
parameters. One well known model is the Cole-Cole relaxation spectrum. A typical IP spectral
response and Cole-Cole relaxation spectrum are shown in Figure 2.
φ
1
Frequency (kHz)
increasing
Debye
si
on
1
|Imaginary|
Log |φ|
|Z
|d
is
pe
r
0.2
Log (φ)
(relative scale)
2
-2
1
10
0.1
10
0
-4
Cole-Cole
0.1
0 +2 +4 +6 +8
Log2 (frequency)
0.1
0.01
0.001 0.01
100
1000
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.9
Real
Figure 2: IP spectral response and Cole-Cole relaxation, after Pelton et al. (1983), by permission.
The shape of the Cole-Cole relaxation spectrum for a single data point can be fully described by four
parameters; the ohmic resistivity, rDC, the chargeability, M, the relaxation time/time constant, t, and
the exponent of the angular frequency, w. Since the spectral IP parameters are found for a single
datapoint, they are apparent parameters, i.e. non-geometric means of the real distribution of
resistivity, chargeability, etc. in the volume of ground sampled by the IP measurement. Often for 2D
surveys, the chargeability and resistivity will be processed to recover the true 2D chargeability and
resistivity distributions in the ground, whereas the phase lag or relaxation time and frequency
exponent will be plotted as 2D pseudosections, or plots of the apparent values.
Interpretation
Using SIP, the geophysicist can observe variations in up to four different geoelectrical parameters,
significantly reducing the ambiguity in interpretation of the ground compared to conventional
resistivity surveys. Different type of ore bodies can be distinguished based on the typical shapes of
their spectral IP responses. Additionally, the spectral IP parameters can reveal important information
about the subsurface, for example the grain size distribution.
B
A
100
100
C
10
10
B
1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
Log2 (frequency, Hz)
3
4
1
Volume (%)
Phase angle φ (mrad)
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
B
0.4
0.2
0
3
2
0.4
A
C
C
1
0
-1
-2
Log2 (grain size, mm)
0.2
-3
-4
0
Figure 3: The effect of grain size distribution on the phase angle response, after Hallof (1983), by
permission. Left: Spectral IP response. Right: Equivalent grain size distributions.
References
Hallof, P.G. 1983. An introduction to the use of the Spectral Induced Polarization Method. Markham,
Ontario: Phoenix Geophysics Ltd.
Pelton, W.H., Sill, W.R. and Smith, B.D. 1983. Interpretation of complex resistivity and dielectric data,
Part I. Geophysical Transactions, 29(3):297-330.
Reynolds, J.M. 2011. An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. John Wiley & Sons
Ltd, Chichester & London, 2nd ed., 712 pp.
www.reynolds-international.co.uk
2
© RIL 03/2011