Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Safety Management of Unique Populations Adele L. Abrams, Esq., CMSP Law Office of Adele L. Abrams PC www.safety-law.com Overview - OSHA General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act) requires employers to provide work and a work environment free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. All workers must be equally protected : age, race, gender, culture, disability status This requires consideration of unique characteristics that may pose safety/health risks re: equipment, PPE, chemical exposures “At Risk” Workers Research has identified the following variables as being related to a disproportionate share of injuries and illnesses at the worksite on the part of employees: Fatal injury rates were lower among younger workers ( age 25-34 had rate of 2.3 per 100K FTE) than older workers (age 65+ had rate of 9.4 per 100K FTE) The length of time on the job (new employees have higher incidence rates). The size of the firm (in general terms, medium-size firms have higher incidence rates than smaller or larger firms). The type of work performed (incidence and severity rates vary significantly by SIC Code). The use of hazardous substances (by SIC Code). Worker status – higher injury rates among “contingent workers” (temps, day laborers, “gig” economy) “At Risk” Workers - Internal Data Examine the incidence of accidents and injuries, both within the company and within the industry. If employees in certain occupational categories are experiencing higher accident and injury rates than other employees, training may be one way to reduce that rate. If certain job categories have high incidence rates for unique populations, consider what heightened risk factors may be present … and control for these hazards Thorough accident investigation (and examination of “near misses”) can identify not only specific employees who could benefit from training but also identify company-wide needs. “Multi-Generational” Workforce: Cultural Challenges Traditionalist Born: 1928-1945 Boomer Born: 1946-1964 Generation X Generation Y Born: 1965-1980 Born: 1980-2000 Four generations (cultures) are being asked to coexist in the early 21st century workplace Source: Based in part on “Meeting the Challenges of Tomorrow's Workplace,” CEO Magazine Training Considerations OSHA expects training to be provided in “language and vocabulary” workers can comprehend – use of translators or subtitles will make for less effective instruction If deficiency exists in the employer's training program, CSHO must document evidence of any barriers or impediments to understanding, as well as any other facts that would demonstrate that employees were unable to apply training info to their specific workplace conditions. When training young workers, experienced workers may not see evident hazards because “short cuts” have become entrenched Older workers are likely to do the “task training” or OTJ training for newer workers – make sure SOP/JSA are actually being followed by the trainer (or update as needed) Millenials are accustomed to classroom situations that encourage interaction between students, and want training materials that are varied, tech-oriented, interactive. US Census: Patterns of Growth by Age Percent Growth in U.S. Population by Age: 2000-2010 3. Rapid growth in the over-55 workforce 80% 60% 48% 40% 18% 20% 5% 0% -20% 5% 2. Few younger workers entering 16-24 15% 25-34 -9% 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Age of Workers 1. Declining number of mid-career workers Source: U.S. Census Bureau . . . Continuing Into the Future Percent Growth in U.S. Workforce by Age: 2000-2020 80% 73% 54% 60% 40% 20% 7% 8% 7% 3% 0% -10% -20% under 14 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-55 55-64 65+ Age of Workers Source: U.S. Census Bureau Aging & Occupational Safety: A Balance of Factors Possible Limitations Compensating Factors? Mental Capacity Chronic Conditions Physical Capacity Attitude Judgment Flexibility Interest in learning new things Medical costs rise with age: Estimated 25% increase from age 40 to 50 .. 35% increase from age 50 to 60 Workers 65+ accounted for 13.4% of all 2015 workplace fatalities Aging Worker Safety Issues Potential OSH problems for elder workers include: Loss of vital functions (vision, hearing) Loss of strength, response speed due to lower muscle mass Prone to MSDs, back injuries etc. Greater use of prescription medicines due to underlying medical conditions Injuries to older workers may be more severe and take longer for recovery Physical Capacity Challenges: Can Older Workers Keep Up? Physiology Maximal strength at 20-30 years O2 uptake reduced to 70% (max) by 65 years Older adults work closer to capacity Match Ability to Job Requirements Change in industry from manufacturing to services Change in job duties from physical to mental NOTE: ADA may apply and require “reasonable accommodation” of workers with physical, or mental, limitations covered by statute Balance with “direct threat to safety” affirmative defense Aging Worker Recommendations Elder workers should discuss medical conditions and their ability to work with personal physician or IME during postoffer medical examinations – initiate interactive dialogue with employer if “reasonable accommodation” needed for safety or other purposes. Underlying medical conditions may put elder workers at increased risk and susceptibility to injury, and this cannot be ignored: early detection and treatment of sensory impairments (hearing loss or visual impairment) and conditions such as early onset Alzheimer’s, can reduce the risk for injury. Wellness plays a critical part – take steps to lower workers’ risk of disease … and make sure wellness programs are not structured as to make elder workers ineligible to participate and obtain benefits (monetary and otherwise). Such programs can also increase elder workers’ knowledge about chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, and arthritis and assist illness prevention. Aging Worker Recommendations Perform frequent monitoring to ensure the older worker can handle job tasks as well as when they started their job. Elder workers may no longer be able to safely wear respirators or certain other PPE – they may also take medications that can interfere with equipment operation or impair concentration. Occupational exposure limits should be used with the understanding that they may not provide adequate protection. ADA prohibits discrimination against qualified people with a disability who could perform the job, even if they need a "reasonable accommodation.“ ADEA prohibits discrimination against workers/applicants age 40 and above, on the basis of age. Incorporate wellness activities in the overall worksite employee health and safety program. Youth Worker Issues Youth workers 14-24 represent over 12% of nonfatal injury cases. Youth workers are at risk of workplace injury because: inexperience at work physical, cognitive, and emotional developmental characteristics hesitancy to ask questions inadequate training – failure to recognize workplace dangers “10 feet tall and bullet-proof” (peer pressure on risk-taking) About 30 percent of young worker fatalities occurred at family-owned businesses. Federal and state legal requirements preclude younger workers from certain occupations or job positions, or operating certain equipment. Restrictions on Youth Workers Additional orders promulgated pursuant to the FLSA prohibit operation of other equipment used in many manufacturing facilities by certain age groups, because of the unique hazards they pose to workers younger than 18 years of age. Equipment that cannot be operated by those under age 18 includes: Order 2, driving a motor vehicle and being an outside helper on a motor vehicle; Order 5, operation of power-driven wood-working machines; Order 8, operation of power-driven metal forming, punching, and shearig machines; Order 12, operation of paper-products machines; and Order 14, operation of circular saws, band saws, and guillotine shears. Youths who are 14 or 15 are completely barred from working in manufacturing facilities Youth Worker Incidence Rates Recommendations – Youth Workers Adult workers must lead by example and not suggest to youngsters that it is permissible to take shortcuts, ignore PPE requirements, or otherwise deviate from MSHA/OSHA requirements. Recognize the hazards and reduce the potential for injury/illness through risk assessment & hazard mitigation. Supervise youth workers appropriately Make sure that supervisors, and adult co-workers, are aware of which tasks young workers are prohibited from performing. Be aware that young workers often are afraid to ask questions out of fear that they will appear “stupid.” Evaluate whether these workers actually have comprehended the information provided in training Recommendations – Youth Workers Make sure equipment used by workers is safe and legal, and color-code equipment that is “off-limits” to workers under the age of 18. This will make it easier to spot potential violations of state child labor laws and/or the FLSA. Train workers in hazard recognition and safe work practices. Have young workers demonstrate that they can perform assigned tasks safely and correctly, and obtain feedback about the training. Develop an injury and illness prevention program that involves supervisors and experienced workers Include a process for identifying and solving safety and health problems. Use the available MSHA/OSHA consultation programs to help improve safety and health management programs. Hispanic Worker Issues Hispanics or Latinos are persons of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central-American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Fatal injuries involving Hispanic/Latino workers rose 12% in 2015, accounting for nearly 19% of all workplace fatalities. Hispanic workers were injured in 14% of non-fatal cases in 2015 (African-Americans were injured in 8% of total cases by comparison) Potential underreporting due to fear of retaliation, especially if worker’s legal status is at issue. State law (HB 27) passed Ohio House (5/17) barring undocumented workers from receiving WC benefits It immunizes employers for injuries suffered by undocumented immigrants unless worker proves the employer knew their status. Training for ESL Workers Employer must instruct employees using both a language and vocabulary that the employees can understand. If the employee's vocabulary is limited, the training must account for that limitation. OSHA HazCom Training - CPL 2-2.38(D)(1998) states: "[i]f the employees receive job instructions in a language other than English, then training and information to be conveyed under the [hazard communication standard] will also need to be conducted in a foreign language" Construction training policy: "instruction that employers must provide under §1926.21 must be tailored to the employees' language and education...." If employees are not literate, telling them to read training materials will not satisfy the employer's training obligation. OSHA has webtool to help employers with a Spanish-speaking workforce identify outreach resources: https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/data_Hispanic/hispanic_outrea ch.pdf ESL Solutions? Employers and trade associations can build upon these projects to develop culturally competent programs that engage Hispanic workers in identifying and address their occupational health and safety concerns. Train in native language to ensure comprehension – select translators carefully Ensure SDSs, labels and warning signs are understandable (bi-lingual or use pictures) Translate company safety materials into workforces’ languages Pair non-English speaking workers with seasoned bilingual worker or supervisor, so they can observe safe work practices and receive appropriate mentoring Assure workers that it IS macho to wear PPE No second class workers when it comes to safety & health! Gender Considerations About 60% of women are in workforce (twice rate of 1950s): they are more likely to do temporary, contingent or part-time work and immigrant women are particularly high-risk group. In 2015, women represented 38% of nonfatal injury/illnesses cases … and 7% of fatal cases Lost-time differences often ignored in research agendas average time lost for women per occurrence is 8.5 weeks v. 6.5 weeks for men over 14% of women’s injuries results in absences longer than 25 weeks) Domestic sector jobs often lack worker’s compensation coverage, pensions, or medical coverage … and employers may not provide any safety-related training or appropriate PPE (or HazCom info for chemicals used in cleaning etc.) Laws Affecting Gender & OSH United States’ safety laws do not distinguish between men and women, Civil Rights Act protects against pregnancy and gender discrimination but EEOC claims are hard to sustain and expensive to litigate. UK legislation on OSH is “gender neutral” but standards are based on norms set by men for men and ignore concentration of women in “low risk” occupations that involve exposures duplicated in their domestic labor “after hours” OELs in all industrialized countries set maximum toxic chemical exposures based on limits for male bodies, based on 8-hr., 5-day weeks. Women often work longer hours with poor fitting protective equipment. Other Countries’ Laws on Gender & OSH EU Council Directive 89/391 states: “Particularly sensitive risk groups must be protected against the dangers which specifically affect them” EU Council Directives 89/654 and 92/85 encourage improvements in OSH for pregnant workers and those who breastfeed, including restrictions on night work, provision of rest areas, and protection against tobacco smoke Finnish OSH Act 738/2002 requires employers to account for reproductive health risks and to consider workers’ age, gender and other personal capacities Some countries bar women from night work, underground work and other activities considered dangerous to women and their reproductive health Women’s OSH Issues Stress (88%) Manual Handling (63%) Repetitive Strain Injuries (53%) Workplace Violence (36%) (OSHA rulemaking dead?) Reproductive health/pregnancy/safe breastfeeding Work-related infectious diseases (OSHA rulemaking dead?) Lack of toilet breaks, toilet facilities, wash stations and tampon machines (bladder infections and toxic shock syndrome) Lack of mentoring/adequate training OTJ sexual harassment Women & Health Care Over 13 million women work in health care and social assistance – 91% of nurses and nursing aides are female Main safety & health risks: Infectious disease transmission & needlesticks Hazardous chemicals (new awareness about worker exposure to chemo drugs and other hazardous medicines and treatments) Shift changes and circadian disruptions Workplace violence Physical tasks (patient lifting) and other activities leading to MSDs Studies suggest psychological job stress (e.g., due to 12-hr-plus workshifts) affects levels of immune system markers in female nurses Women & Construction Nearly 1 million women work in construction Major health & safety concerns: Exposure to chemical and physical agents Noise & hearing loss Injuries from lifting, bending, twisting Falling Being cut Lack of proper education & training Inadequate protective clothing, tools Job stress & sexual harassment/hostile work environment Lack of access to sanitary facilities Reproductive Health Issues Substances affecting reproductive health of women (or men), or ability to have healthy children are reproductive hazards: Radiation Certain chemicals and drugs Biological agents Tobacco and alcohol Some countries still require women to be sterilized in order to work around toxic chemicals, or fire women when they become pregnant United States: This practice barred by 1991 Supreme Court decision in Johnson Controls Chemical OELs may be inappropriate for women workers, who absorb more toxins due to gender differences in metabolism, skin thickness, and rates of excretion of fat-soluble chemicals and may have off-job supplemental exposures Other hazards to pregnant women result from heavy lifting, stress, violence, microelectronics, pesticides, and nanotechnology NIOSH Gender Research Agenda National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) has projects, alerts and research on the following subjects affecting women’s OSH: Breast and cervical cancer caused by chemical exposures Preventing homicide in the workplace Preventing needlestick injuries in health care Providing safety and health protective for a diverse construction workforce Stress at work and link to cardiovascular disease Female reproductive health hazards (VDTs, ionizing radiation, fuel exposure) Ergonomic hazards and injuries Latex allergy prevention Chemical hazards (e.g., perchloroethylene) Physiological stress of respirator use on pregnant women Questions? Adele L. Abrams, Esq., CMSP Law Office of Adele L. Abrams PC [email protected] 301-595-3520