Download TOP TEN CONTRADICTIONS OF SCIENCE

THE TOP TEN CONTRADICTIONS OF SCIENCE
(By: Ricard Jimenez)
Current science is based on the belief (true) that there is a universal pattern which
can unify gravity with quantum relativity. This we might call "The Holy Grail".
The entire evolution of knowledge has consisted, from time immemorial; to identify
patterns in nature can explain how the universe behaves. To date, all other "forces"
or physical manifestations have been able to unify, except for these two. Finding
this pattern show, as you’ll see the great contradictions of the "scientific method"
and how it has always been based on lead us by improper way.
1. THE UNIVERSE IS CONCEPTUAL.
If we seek a pattern able of unifying quantum gravity with relativity, in fact, we're
looking for a universal relation that unifies all the “forces" and "effects" that exist.
Basically, what we would be saying is that everything is related.
Scientists understand that their existence allows us to condense all physical
phenomena we observe into a universal formula. They think that its scope will be
extended only to the physical realm, the "place" that we see more directly. Under
this assumption, not usually contemplate, specifically, the possibility that their
existence may also explain the "spiritual" world.
Some physicists "dissidents" have already reflected this. Many of them believe that
consciousness, the "world" of ideas, thoughts or memories reside in this quantum
plane which also seems to be the gravity or time. Therefore firmly believe that this
universal pattern also must be able to explain this "other level" immaterial, or that
we cannot see directly. Consider the spiritual or conceptual level is alien to reality,
is as irrational as defining what is real only to the world that we can observe.
Because! Realize! Theoretical physicists in this attempt, even without admitting it,
go head to agree with the mystics. Spiritual people long ago are clear: "everything
is connected”. The "official" science, however, is determined to consider
insurmountable that "imaginary" wall that connects the divine with the human.
The universal pattern runs tray is universal connection, not only in the physical
world, but also the spiritual world. This is a contradiction, but not the biggest.
2. THERE ARE NOT EFFECTS OR FORCES.
If we find a relationship between all these forces and effects, basically, what we
would be saying is that all these physical manifestations can be placed on a scale .
If everything is connected, "forces” and “effects”, as concepts, literally jumping into
pieces. Just because of being related would become, by a simple rule simply
features of the Universe.
No longer be a matter of interaction, simply to determine a position on the scale we
are looking for. Would only be a matter of position depending on the power, or the
speed at which we move. In other words, we replace the external interaction by
perception. You may think it's a matter of nuance, but a very important nuance.
After all, everything we perceive is filtered through the senses, everything we
perceive the universe is decoded directly by the mind. We are replacing the role of
the mind as a “challenger or observer “by " participant “.
To think that the ideas, memories or dreams can be explained in physical terms is
as consistent you can say. It's just a broader understanding of the term "material"
to the end, that place where the name even loses such property. Normally
differentiate the material from the immaterial without realizing that although
distant points, both are on the same scale. Cut with a definition, at any given point
does not correspond with reality; it is only an artificial distinction. The universe is
continuous, although seemingly opposed terms, we are talking about the same
"reality."
Whichever way you give, everything goes through your mind. In the background, a
universal pattern is going to connect your mind with the universe. A universal
pattern will open a new door, understanding of perception, realize that the
Universe is not only outside but also inside. Forces and effects are only concepts,
which do not correspond to the reality of the Universe.
3. EVERYTHING IS QUESTION OF SCALE, NOT EXPERIMENTS
If we unify relativity with gravity that we are forming is a universal scale. What
we need to find is how to compose this scale. Relativity refers to the curvature of
the universe, therefore, it is evident that this scale, at least has to be curved, not
only in a straight line. Therefore, we cannot rely only on the decimal scale because
it only understands reality horizontally. Mathematics is a help but, as they are
raised, limited help.
In the universe can only be curved lines and straight lines: no more chances . If the
universal pattern is to represent the universe, of necessity, must include two types
of scale: a curve and a straight. If relativity is the " curved world”, gravity, by
elimination, must represent the "straight world." If not, never represent both the
Universe.
Joining two scales in one and both represent a single, universal pattern you can
think it will be complicated! On the contrary! We only find an original way to
represent reality. This scale or pattern we are writing does not seem to depend on
any experiment or measurement: it is only a matter of reasoning.
4. THE UNIVERSE
MATHEMATIC.
IS
NOT
ONLY
PHYSICAL,
BASICALLY
IS
The universe is manifested through relationships between seemingly opposing
demonstrations. The Big Bang theory, the theory of relativity, gravity, the laws of
electromagnetism or thermodynamics pointing at this address: everything is based
on a combination of energy and gravity. And this is from the "beginning” of the
Universe.
Conceptually we discuss these key players, A “more physical " level we refer to
them in terms of space and time. Our whole universe is binary, because it is
defined in terms of relationships, probability law is another universal law that
expresses, in essence, the possibility that a given event is manifested or not, in the
background is just another relationship, the same as is given to quantum or
fundamental level.
Quantum physics has shown that the basis of our reality is just immaterial. As we
have fallen in our ability to measure the space and time we realized this. The
reality is basically a matter of probability: the probability that a fundamental
particle may or may not be in a given space-time coordinates. As we climb this
manifests as energy and gravity.
Talk of immateriality is very deep, greatly transcends our conception of reality. The
smallest scale at which we have arrived is the Planck scale. This scale currently
define our relationship with the Universe, is the maximum we could get. Speaking
of her talk about this fundamental level,
The mind is our ability to conceptualize. All we can think or express could say that
is conceptual. The two capabilities that can make or abstractions can be condensed
into our ability to express and thinking. Both are nothing more than a
manifestation of the universe within us. Our brain is a great computer that
constantly calculates probabilities and, among them, gives us a result. The
language, therefore, is not more than an advanced feature of this mathematical
conceptual scheme. As Hilbert said, even language can be expressed in
mathematical terms.
Conceptuality is equivalent to mathematics. The universe is expressed in
mathematical terms: that is obvious, but also works this way our mind. Both
"sides" are well connected by a common denominator. We're just looking for the
best way to express this relationship; this is the pattern we are looking for.
A single pattern, therefore, should be able to express mathematically, but not only
that, what I am saying is that, fundamentally, there are no physical laws, if
deeper, mathematical laws only; Relations, in its essence, define what happens on
the scale fundamental in all middle and high scales and in your mind, an scale that
is right in the middle of them all
Accordingly, the mass or particles only exist in our mind, but in reality are nothing
more than mathematics. It is our brain that transforms them into something we
can appreciate. Our reality is a mathematical transformation that occurs at high
speed. This is the reason why all the physical laws can be expressed in
mathematical terms; But in fact, just the opposite happens: we give physical form
to mathematics. This is accomplished through probability interlaced fields, in a
more technical language, unified fields.
5. FIELD OF INTERACTION IS ONLY AN INVENTION.
The last term we have defined in this sense is the field of interaction, a concept
very modern (and expensive) way to define that these fundamental particles
acquire mass. But according to this, the “God particle" or the interaction field are
just that: concepts, one more way to define differently, forces and effects only at the
level of the Planck scale. The “Higgs Bosson” or interaction field is just a matter of
funding, not knowledge: An accelerator is really expensive.
Logically, from a fundamental level, the particles are intertwined to acquire the
mass. But as I said in an earlier point, it is not only an interaction, but basically
interlacing. The universe is constantly moving, everything interacts with each
time. Likewise it makes little sense to define what does not exist or cannot
perceive, is equally irrational to define what is inherent. This is the literal sense
not to admit the existence of external "forces", as they are just features of our
Universe.
Another example: the infinite, the term we use to refer to what we understand
must exist, but we cannot see, seems to be intrinsic to our Universe. Everything
can be divided almost, almost infinite, but actually there at the end do not really
know what happens, basically because we cannot reach. We know it is, it appears
that it is, but we cannot define. When we do we miss the truth, because the infinite
is only a possibility, a theoretical point of convergence, but we do not know if it will.
The most we can hope for is to approach this is the deep sense of probability,
estimating two possibilities of "action" or to pass or not. This is also the meaning of
"off" or "on" the fundamental particles that we perceive or not.
When I speak of interlaced fields I mean the concept of probability of overlapping
planes. This can also be understood as "entanglement", a feature that seems to be
inherent in our Universe. To better understand it, an interlaced field space is
shared by two geometric planes: imagine, for example, two interlaced fields. For
you share "a field of interaction" must be spatially separated. A field interlaced
superimposed also refers to fields.
All these references can be expressed mathematically. This is an example of how
the mathematical language can define what happens at a fundamental level. The
interlaced fields can be expressed as opposing or overlapping planes that can form
geometric shapes.
6. MEASUREMENT IS AN ERROR.
Current science establishes the irrevocable assumption that everything has to be
measured, classified and based on experiments. This is a misconception of
incalculable extent. If you think carefully attempt to measure time and want to say
that this is the right way, it is simply the result of a particular moral, it is only an
opinion. What if instead of measuring time we limited ourselves to understand? In
the background, you see, is only a matter of concepts, but concepts that are as
wrong as ingrained in our minds. Why we cannot form the pattern only through
reasoning? Science is basically constantly question all his precepts, this is a
concept with much foundation but often forget. What's the point if you measure
time ever arrive? And if it happens that we are just traveling in circles?
Think deeply, if our universe did not extend in a straight line, but it was a huge
circle, provided we cut between two points so we'll see will be a straight line. No
matter how close or how far we place the two points, in an infinite universe, we
never will realize that is not a straight line but a huge curve. In the background is
just a matter of perspective, relativity applied to our view.
If you are defining a universal pattern, it is more logical to think that, before we
arrived he was already. The universe was already working before our arrival,
should be humble and recognize.
When we define units or magnitudes to measure the demonstrations, these are all
artificial. In fact, what we are doing is using another pattern to define the pattern
that we find: This is the error. By definition this pattern must be unique, must be
independent of the units of measure that we use to define it. The units of measure
are irrelevant. The pattern, by definition, must be free of them all. What happens if
our unit of measure being unreasonable? After all, if you think about it , we live on
the edge of a sphere and it is defined by an irrational value.
If it were not it would be inconsistent, we have already seen, the universe seems to
come as defined by the probability, but also the concept of “infinity". The infinite, at
bottom, is an irrational concept, a possibility that is not known to happen.
Everything can be defined according to its terms, both sidereal distances as
fundamental particles. The world, in this sense, is irrational: it cannot be defined
in the same way that it is absurd to measure or classify it, to understand it fully.
How can we measure the immaterial? We can analyze the length of a wave, but
who says that you cannot descend? What if the waves were composed of more
waves? The whole history of science has been to an infinitesimal drop, who ensures
that you have reached the end? If you think, at bottom, is nothing more than a
conceptual issue. The conceptual mistake is to separate the physical world because,
at bottom, are the same. I'll repeat, our entire universe is perceptions, perceptions
that are filtered by our senses. Our whole universe comes filtered through our
mind, and our mind is basically conceptual.
7. IRRATIONAL OR NOT WHAT A CONTRADICTION!
In physics, irrational numbers are chosen for their simplicity, and because a broad
spectrum agree with the phenomena of space and time. Irrational numbers are
infinite, so are the elect. They are, like it or not, in all physical manifestations are
the best to represent them and this is no accident. Contrary to what we think, is
not that irrational numbers serve to represent the physical manifestations , is that
the physical manifestations in the background are irrational , two very different
views.
A physical theory is not taken into account if it can be validated through the
"mathematical method" and this usually results rule out irrational precisely the
"numbers" on which it is based. Irrational numbers express relationships, not
quantities, this is a crucial mistake. For this reason as well defines the universe,
because the universe is based on the same concept: relationships, relationships
everywhere and basically irrational relationships.
To think that an irrational number is a number more is wrong. This is one of the
biggest mistakes of mathematics. In the physical world we can never define a
position, is one of the consequences of relativity, or movement. This fits perfectly
with the definition of irrational, a relationship that can never be defined.
Consequently, neither the scientific method is valid, because the immateriality
cannot be measured in infinitesimal terms, or the mathematical method we use is
correct to validate. Two contradictions as one. Until contradictions continue a
relationship.
Irrational numbers express relationships
, the relationship
between a curved and a straight segment, or phi
the relationship between two
line segments. Both express mathematical relationships that will always, no
matter what point of the scale we place ourselves. In the background, these
relations expressing relativity. Relativity taken to infinity is equal to the
probability.
Irrational numbers are just an exception to the decimal scale, which included an
approximation, but we express these relations, and the same cannot be included in
a line, are basically out of it.
8. THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IS NOT VALID FOR FINDING A GLOBAL
SOLUTION.
If we find the universal pattern and if we assume its existence before our arrival,
we might assume that, to define it we cannot rely either magnitudes or artificial
concepts, although they can help. The same must be independent of the language
we use to describe it, must be free of human baggage. Therefore, imposing
conditional upon a scientific or mathematical method is to limit our understanding
of reality. A method, again, is nothing more than the prevailing view, but need not
correspond to reality. All of the wrong mathematical interpretation is very difficult
to change, because it is already part of our beliefs. And beliefs, like faith, not
constantly require them demonstrate to us just are correct. No question them, we
take them for good.
Assuming that the universal pattern must be unique, by definition, has to fulfill
the precept of "as above, so below."! Remember! ... One set of integrated
relationship or relationships shall be revealed in all directions but also be
independent of the measure we use to describe it. This fits perfectly with the
concept of relationship. Every relationship is indivisible and independent of the
measure we use to define it.
According to this, the constants that we use today whether universals are only
approximations of reality. In the world nothing is certain, this is another
consequence of term relationship, it is always a matter of two.
The existence of the Holy Grail makes clear that all events are related, they all
have to give both the fundamental level and at the global level. A black hole can be
in a fundamental particle or in the whole universe; the measure or the point on the
scale is irrelevant.
Science requires rigorous standards of procedure, but, basically, they are just
irrational beliefs.
9. UNIVERSAL PATTERN IS NOT PHYSICAL, IS MYSTIC.
If we find a universal pattern we must take account of these precepts:
The pattern has been to combine a curve with a straight scale and based on
relationships. It must be independent of the scale we use to define, meet mystical
precept as above, so below, and also be independent of the unit of measurement.
It should include, as a basis for its creation, irrational numbers. Must also refer to
our full scale, 0 and 1, the terms in which we define any scale to be numbered.
It must be able to express movement, entanglement, gravity and relativity, the
nature of our universe. It must be able to be expressed in mathematical terms.
Finally, it has to represent a three-dimensional scale, because that's how our
universe is manifested, can never be defined in terms of our decimal scale. This is
the penultimate contradiction.
If you think there is only a "discipline” that meets all these concepts. We have only
applied the reasoning. Just one You know what?: Geometry. It’s only a matter of
time that scientists understand this. The world is not only mathematical but is
essentially geometric.
A geometric figure does not depend on the unit of measurement does not depend on
how you define or its spatial position. The plans that include forming relationships.
Logically any geometric figure is likely to be expressed in mathematical terms. The
concept "opposite plane" simply refers to a different spatial orientation. The
geometry is based on irrational numbers.
In the same way that we look for an original way to represent reality, you may find
a geometrically fractal manner that preserves relationships at all scales; And that,
in turn , can be composed in an extremely simple manner. Moreover, a single
condition to carry it out. You know only what is necessary? Always squared. Think
about this, but in a different way: be squared means geometrically divided into two.
This is the reason why all the "forces" and "effects" that we know are based on a
ratio, the ratio of the square and the square of the inverse, for example, relativity
or the Law of Gravitation.
10. THE LAST CONTRADICTION.
What defines our evolution is our ability to maximize the light that surrounds us
and in the background the concept is the same as in the plant world. Whenever we
find a pattern we jump in knowledge. Our main difference from other species is our
ability to go beyond (metaphorically) over time. What defines us is not only our
capacity to think or our reasoning, this is secondary, a very limited thinking. What
defines our species is our ability to think about the future and the past. This can be
defined as lighting, but it is also irrelevant, because everything is light in our
universe, we only grasp.
Remembering the past and dream of the future, two abilities are lost if not used;
This is the physical aspect of our evolution.
In the infinitesimal world think reality may or may not occur, we spoke to our
probability scale, our ability to define or perceive events opposite. But everything is
based on the same principle.
They say that energy is neither created nor destroyed but transformed: Perhaps it
would be more correct to say that energy only changes its form passes successively
curved lines to straight lines.
All the effort of those who will govern has always been to make you see the
universe as something external; basically, this is to decouple the space of time.
They do not want you to see how everything is connected both physically and
spiritually. Because if you understand this you realize immediately the great power
we have and we always tried to hide the power of groupthink to change reality:
Once you understand the society change.
Science as it is structured does not allow opposition nor conscientious objection
only tell their precepts, it is the unified thought. Basically, science is the power
game. See reality from a single point of view leads to this result: a science that is
not open is not science, it is religion. And where there is religion a part of the
reason is always sacrificed.
If you want to know more, as this Universal Pattern is created and how reality is
created, I invite you to read my posts. You can find them all on Scribd, author:
mundoaureo
Welcome to unified world!