Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Powering up the RFID chip - Remotely 1 Basic Reader-Tag System Rectifier Logic & Memory Reader Tag 2 Simple Magnetically Coupled Circuit I1 Z1’ . . + Vi ~ Z1’ and Z2’ can be used to represent resistors, capacitors etc. as required I2 L1, R1 Vi = Z1.I1 - jwM.I2 0 = Z2.I2 - jwM.I1 L2, R2 Z2’ Define self-impedance of each loop: Z1 = Z1’ +R1+ jwL1 Z2 = Z2’ +R2+ jwL2 Applying KVL in each loop Reflected impedance Input impedance Vi wM 2 Z1 I1 Z2 General Expressions wM Transfer admittance I2 Vi j Z1.Z 2 . Z1.Z 2 wM 1 Z 1 . Z 2 2 3 Input impedance Current Transfer ratio Vi wM 2 Z1 I1 Z2 I 2 jw.M I1 Z2 General Expressions wM Transfer admittance I2 Vi j Z1.Z 2 . Z1.Z 2 wM 1 Z 1 . Z 2 2 4 Example: Inductively Coupled Resistive Circuit (Transformer) jwM.I2 Voltage Current Source voltage (R1 + jwL1).I1 (R2 + jwL2).I2 = jwM.I1 Vi = (R1 + jwL1).I1 - jwM.I2 0 = (R2 + jwL2).I2 - jwM.I1 I1 I2 . . R1 + Vi ~ Vi L1 L2 R2 I2 I1 5 Ideal Transformer jwM.I2 Voltage Current Source voltage jwL1.I1 (R2 + jwL2).I2 = jwM.I1 Vi = jwL1.I1 - jwM.I2 0 = (R2 + jwL2).I2 - jwM.I1 I1 Vi I2 R1 ~ 0 + Vi ~ R1 << w.L1 R2 << w.L2 k~1 L1 . . L2 R2 I2 I1 R 2 jwL2 L2 1 L2 1 . I2 jwM k L1.L2 k L1 k.N I1 6 Self Quiz 1. Inductively coupled circuit with R1= 1W, R2= 2W, L1=L2, w.L1=200W, k= 0.8 If I1= 1A, what is the approximate value of I2? (KVL) 2. If R2 = 1W, what is the approximate value of I2? 3. What is approximate input impedance in each case? 4. What is the approximate input impedance if k ~ 1? 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 0.8 A 0.8 A (Same!) (1+ j.72) W (Unchanged!) 1W 8 wM I2 Vi Transfer admittance j . Z1.Z 2 Z1.Z 2 wM 1 Z 1 . Z 2 2 Effectiveness to drive current through secondary – would like to maximize for effective power transfer Introduce resonance I1 C1 + Vi ~ I2 R1 L1 . . Self impedances: Z1 = 1/ jwC1 +R1+ jwL1 Z2 = 1/ jwC2 +R2+ jwL2 R2 L2 Let resonance occur at w0 C2 1 L1.C1 1 L2.C2 which is our excitation frequency CAVEAT: Series resonance for illustration only! 9 At w w0, we have Z1 =R1, Z2 =R2 and Transfer admittance is wM I2 Vi j R1.R 2 . R1.R 2 wM 1 R1.R 2 2 j . k Q1.Q2 R1.R 2 1 k Q1.Q2 2 0.5 Q1=30 Q2=40 0.4 k Q1.Q2 1 k Q1.Q2 0.3 2 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 1 10 100 Coupling Coefficient % Peak occurs at k Q1.Q2 1 Beyond this value of k, Transfer admittance falls! 10 Self Quiz Reader and Tag both has Q =25, and each has ESR (effective series resistance ) = 5W. The reader is excited by 1V. What is the current in the Tag for k = 1%, 4%, 10% if both primary and secondary tuned to same frequency? 11 Q= 25 k R ohm= 5 k.Q kQ/(1+kQ^2) I amps I^2. R mW 0.01 0.25 0.235294 0.047 11.07 0.04 1 0.5 0.1 50.00 0.1 2.5 0.344828 0.069 23.78 0.16 4 0.235294 0.047 11.07 12 Transfer admittance 0.5 0.4 k Q1.Q2 1 k Q1.Q2 0.3 2 0.2 Weak coupling Large Separation Tight coupling Small Separation 0.1 0 0.1 1 10 100 Coupling Coefficient % spacing Spacing ↑ => Coupling coefficient ↓ Diminishing return – does not help reducing the spacing beyond a certain point 13 Weak Coupling Case 0.5 0.4 If k Q1.Q2 1 then coupling is weak 0.3 0.2 In other words Then wM 0.1 1 0 0.1 1 10 100 R1.R 2 k Q1.Q2 I2 w.M j. Vi R1.R 2 R1.R 2 14 Resonant vs. Non-resonant wM Transfer admittance - general expression For weak coupling: I2 Vi wM j Z1.Z 2 1 Z1.Z2 For non-resonant situation I2 wM wM j j. Vi Z1.Z2 (R1 jwL1)( R 2 jwL2) . Z1.Z 2 wM 1 Z1.Z 2 => 2 I2 wM j Vi Z1.Z 2 For resonant situation I2 wM j Vi R1.R 2 I 2 _ resonant (R1 jwL1)( R 2 jwL2) (1 jQ1).(1 jQ 2) Q1.Q2 I 2 _ non resonant R1.R 2 Current increases by Q1.Q2 (Product of loaded Q’s) 15 Effects of Resonance • Resonance helps to increase current in coupled loop ~1000X • But it causes strange behavior (reduction of secondary current at close range). Why ? 16 Self Quiz • The primary coil is tuned to a certain frequency and excited by a voltage source of the same frequency. A secondary coil, also tuned to the same frequency is gradually brought in from far distance. How does the current in the secondary coil behave with changing distance? (qualitative description) • Two coils each of Q=50 is taken. Current is measured in second coil with and without tuning capacitor (tuned to frequency of excitation). What is the ratio of currents in the two scenarios? 17 Self Quiz • The primary coil is tuned to a certain frequency and excited by a voltage source of the same frequency. A secondary coil, also tuned to the same frequency is gradually brought in from far distance. How does the current in the secondary coil behave with changing distance? Increases till k.sqrt(Q1.Q2) = 1, then decreases • Two coils each of Q=50 is taken. Current is measured in second coil with and without tuning capacitor (tuned to frequency of excitation). What is the ratio of currents in the two scenarios? 50*50 = 2500 18 Self Quiz • A Reader-tag system has a certain maximum read range determined by current needed to turn on the Tag chip. Q of the tag is halved. How much is the max read range compared to original? [Assume weak coupling] R2 is doubled (wM/R1.R2) halved range halved 19 Inductively Coupled Series Resonant Circuits Excitation at higher than resonant frequency Voltage Current Source voltage (R2+j.X2).I2 = jwM.I1 + ~ (R1+j.X1).I1 + I2 Vi = [R1 + j(wL1-1/wC1)].I1 - jwM.I2 0 = [R2 + j(wL2-1/wC2)].I2 - jwM.I1 I1 C1 + Vi ~ -jwM.I2 I1 I2 R1 L1 . . R2 L2 C2 Phase angle between Vi and I1 may be > or < 0 depending on coupling 20 Inductively Coupled Series Resonant Circuits Excitation at resonant frequency Voltage Current Source voltage R2.I2 = jwM.I1 R1.I1 Vi = [R1 + j(wL1-1/wC1)].I1 - jwM.I2 0 = [R2 + j(wL2-1/wC2)].I2 - jwM.I1 I1 C1 + Vi ~ Vi I2 R1 L1 . . I2 -jwM.I2 R2 L2 C2 I1 21 Inductively Coupled Series Resonant Circuits Excitation at lower than resonant frequency (R1-j.X1).I1 Voltage Current Source voltage I2 -jwM.I2 I1 Vi = [R1 + j(wL1-1/wC1)].I1 - jwM.I2 0 = [R2 + j(wL2-1/wC2)].I2 - jwM.I1 I1 C1 + Vi ~ (R2-j.X2).I2 = jwM.I1 I2 R1 L1 . . R2 L2 C2 • Phase angle between Vi and I1 may be > or < 0 depending on coupling • I1 and I2 flowing in same direction for lossless case 22 2 2 1 1 + + Below resonance (capacitive) 2 1 + Resonance (resistive) Above resonance (inductive) I2 I1 I1 I2 I1 I2 23 Power Transmission Efficiency h Rectifier Logic & Memory Reader Equivalent Resistive Load Tag Power diss ipated at load h Power available from source 24 Parallel to Series Transformation C ≡ Cs At a certain frequency RL RLs RL Q RL .wC XC Cs C If Q>>1 then: XC 2 RLs RL Example: f = 13.56 MHz C= 50.0 pF (XC = 235W RL = 2000 W Cs pF (Exact): 50.7 pF Cs pF (Approx): 50.0 pF RLs (Exact): 27.2 W RLs (Approx): 27.6 W 25 I1 C1 + Vi I2 R1 . . R2 L1 ~ C2 RLs L2 Zin Power dissipated at load = |I2|2.RLs Power available from source = |I1|2.Re(Zin) 2 2 jwM h 2 . Z2 I1 . Re( Zin ) I2 .RLs RLs w2 M 2 Re Z1 Z2 Assuming both Reader and Tag are resonant at excitation frequency h w2 M 2 R 2 RLs 2 . RLs w2 M 2 R1 R 2 RLs 26 Power transfer efficiency wM = 15W 60 40 wM = 5W 20 0 1 10 100 Load resistance Kohm For weak coupling, efficiency is maximum when R2 = RLs 1 R 2 2RL 2 w .C2 RL↑ => C2 ↓ for given R2 Low dissipation chips usually use less tank capacitance 27 Special Case • • • • Both Reader and Tag are resonant at excitation frequency L1.C1=L2.C2 = w02 Weak coupling R1>> Reflected impedance Tag is independently matched to load R2=RLs => Total resistance in Tag = 2R2 = 2RLs Q of load (XC2/RLs) >> 1 R w0 2 M 2 h reflect 4.RLs .R1 2R1 V 2 w0 2 M 2 V2 1 2 Pchip . R .I1 R reflect reflect 2 2 2 4.R1 RLs 2.R1 28 Self Quiz XC = 200 ohm (C~ 50 pF) RL = 10Kohm What is the value of Tag resistance for optimum power transfer at weak coupling? If XC is changed to 300 ohm, what is the value of Tag resistance for optimum power transfer at weak coupling? 29 Self Quiz XC = 200 ohm (C~ 50 pF) RL = 10Kohm What is the value of Tag resistance for optimum power transfer at weak coupling? 200^2/10e3= 4 ohm [Traces could be too wide for a compact tag!] If XC is changed to 300 ohm (C~ 33 pF), what is the value of Tag resistance for optimum power transfer at weak coupling? 300^2/10e3= 9 ohm [Compact tag is realistic] 30 Measurement of Resonance Parameters • • Resonant frequency Loaded Q • Caution: – Maintain weak coupling with probe loop Vector Network Analyzer Sensing Loop 31 Measurement on a Tag attached to curved surface 32 33 Principle of Measurement Z1 = R1 + j.wL1 Sensing Loop alone Z2 = R1 + j.wL1 + (wM)2. YDUT Sensing Loop + DUT Z2 - Z2 = (wM)2. YDUT YDU T If s-parameter is used s11 _ M Z1 Z0 Z1 Z0 s11 _ D Z 2 Z0 Z 2 Z0 Sensing Loop alone – stored in Memory Sensing Loop + DUT – ‘Data’ Data – Memory = s11_D - s11_M 2.Z0.( Z2 Z1) 2(Z2 Z1) 2 .wM 2 .YDUT ( Z0 Z1).( Z0 Z2). Z0 Z0 Approximation valid if Z0>> Z1, Z2. error for low values of YDUT Transmission method is more accurate 34 Spectral Splitting 35 Are these phenomena related? 0.5 k Q1.Q2 1 k Q1.Q2 0.4 2 0.3 Weak coupling Tight coupling Small Separation Large Separation ~ secondary current 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 1 10 100 Coupling Coefficient % spacing 36 I1 I2 M . . R1 + L1 V1 I1 R1 R2 + L2 L2-M R2 I2 + + ≡ V2 L1-M M V1 V2 V1= (R1+jwL1).I1 + jwM.I2 V2= (R2+jwL2).I2 + jwM.I1 I1 C1 + Vi ~ I1 R1 L1 . . R2 L2 ≡ C2 Vi ~ R1 L1-M L2-M R2 C1 M C2 37 I1 Let: R1 Vi ~ L1-M L2-M R2 C1 M C2 (L1, C1) => f0 (L2, C2) => f0 i.e. w0.L1=1/(w0.C1) w0.L2=1/(w0.C2) If M~0 (weak coupling), I1 exhibits series resonance behavior determined by L1, C1 If coupling is NOT weak: At f=f0: R2+j.[w0.(L2-M)-1/(w0.C2)] = R2- jw0.M I1 Vi ~ R1 C1 Parallel resonance chokes current at f0 [+jw.M and –jw.M in shunt] ~1/w02.M L1-M M ~w02.M2/R2 Input is capacitive +jw.M -jw.M (w0.M)/R2>>1 If R2 ↑ (Q2↓) => choking ↓ 38 Self Quiz • Lossless Resonators tuned at f1 and f2. When coupling is increased, at what frequency parallel resonance occurs? 39 Self Quiz • Lossless Resonators tuned at f1 and f2. When coupling is increased, at what frequency parallel resonance occurs? • f2 when looking from resonator 1 and vice versa 40 Series resonances I1 f<f0 ‘Odd Mode’ Vi ~ R1 C1 I1 f>f0 ‘Even Mode’ Occurs when shunt arm is shorted Vi ~ C1 L1-M Frequency↓=> Shunt arm more and more capacitive M R1 L1-M L2-M M R2 C2 Frequency↑ => Shunt arm less and less capacitive and then more and more inductive Series and parallel resonances alternate 41 R1=R2=6 ohm L1=L2=2700 nH C1=C2=50 pF Q1=Q2=38.7 f01=f02=13.7 MHz kc 1 Q1.Q2 Critical coupling = 0.026 Excitation voltage = 1V Magnetically Coupled Series Resonators Secondary current mA 100 13.7 80 60 40 20 0 10 k=kc k=0.1 k=0.25 k=kc/2 12 14 16 18 Frequency MHz 42 Resonances for Lossless Identical resonators L1=L2=L C1=C2=C R1=R2=0 Series Parallel L-M C 2M w0 1 (L M).C C L-M w0 Series C 1 L.C L-M w1 1 (L M).C 43 Two NFC Tags ~ equally coupled with Sensing Loop 44 Realistic Situation R1=R2=6 ohm L1=L2=2700 nH C1=50pF C2= 47pF Q1=38.7 (at f01) Q2=39.9 (at f02) f01=13.7 MHz f02= 14.1 MHz Critical coupling = 0.025 Excitation voltage = 1V Magnetically Coupled Series Resonators Secondary current mA 100 13.714.1 80 60 40 20 0 10 k=kc k=0.1 k=0.25 k=kc/2 12 14 16 18 Frequency MHz 45 Excitation Frequency as Parameter Secondary current mA 100 1 80 2.6% Q1.Q2 60 13.7 14.1 13.9 14.3 13.5 40 20 0 1 10 100 Coupling coeff % Significant degradation in weakly coupled region when frequency of excitation is outside the band between resonant frequencies with a little bit improvement in close range 46 Review Quiz • For two magnetically coupled resonators tuned at same frequency, we observed that parallel resonance occurs above a certain M. To arrive at this we used an equivalent T network for magnetically coupled inductors. How this phenomenon is explained by reflected impedance? 47 Review Quiz • For two magnetically coupled resonators tuned at same frequency, we observed that parallel resonance occurs above a certain M. To arrive at this we used an equivalent T network for magnetically coupled inductors. How this phenomenon is explained by reflected impedance? Primary current ~ 1 ωM 2 R1 Z2 is maximized when Z2 is minimum Series resonance in secondary => parallel resonance in primary 48