Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Nitrate load change in surface and groundwater under irrigable semi-arid A case study in Sirsa Irrigation Circle (SIC), India M.Sc. Thesis by Asmerom Gebreyesus August 2012 Irrigation and Water Engineering Group Picture front page: from archive of the WATPRO (2001-2002) Nitrate load change in surface and groundwater under irrigable semi-arid A case study in Sirsa Irrigation Circle (SIC), India Master thesis Irrigation and Water Engineering submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science in International Land and Water Management at Wageningen University, the Netherlands Asmerom Gebreyesus August 2012 Supervisors: Dr.ir. Henk Ritzema Irrigation and Water Engineering Group Wageningen University The Netherlands www.iwe.wur.nl/uk Ir. Gert-Jan Noij IWRM Alterra The Netherlands http://www.alterra.wur.n “This report (product) is produced by students of Wageningen University as part of their MSc-programme. It is not an official publication of Wageningen University or Wageningen UR and the content herein does not represent any formal position or representation by Wageningen University.“ “Copyright © 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form of by any means, without the prior consent of the authors.“ ABSTRACT Nitrate load change in surface and groundwater under irrigable semi-arid A case study in Sirsa Irrigation Circle (SIC), India Nitrate leaching is a common problem from root zone of frequently irrigated agricultural area where often identified as an important contributor of nitrate to groundwater. However, before incorporating feasible environmentally sound measures, it is essential to take research so as to quantify the existing trend. Hence, the objective of the study is to quantify the amount of nitrate loss after simulated with different amount of irrigation water and fertilizer in different cropping pattern with distinct soil textural properties. And the study further extend to examine whether nitrate loss from Sirsa Irrigation Circle (SIC) was a threat to the groundwater and hence the environment. To examine the nitrate level both SWAP and ANIMO model used for water balance a nd nutrient loss. Using models, simulation was carried out to study the impact of different water and fertilizer management in semiarid Sirsa irrigation circle. Data collected in the year 2001/2002 for water productivity analysis by the WATPRO project was used as an input parameters and subsequently utilized in predicting nitrate loss. Intensive data about the physiochemical properties of the soil at different phenological stage of the crop, data about the meteorological condition of the site, characteristics of the crops and different agricultural inputs was collected during the specified period. For model calibration and validation beside literature review experts’ advice was taken into consideration. The experiment was conducted in 11 research fields for SWAP analysis and out of which two fields were selected for nitrate loss analysis. Result of the simulation prevails additional application of water incites runoff in Karnal field and bottom flux in Sirsa field. The amount of nitrate loss from both rice and wheat crops in Karnal field shows low compared to the amount of nitrate generated from Sirsa area. However, the amount of nitrate loss due runoff in Karnal field noted to score high compared to any field in Sirsa. Generally, the amount of nitrate loss due to irrigation water supply in a double crop simulation was large compared to the single crop simulation. On the other hand additional inorganic fertilizer application noted to simulate less nitrate compared to the effect of irrigation water supply. Finally, it was concluded that combined effect of both fertilizer and irrigation shows remarkable effect on the amount of nitrate loss from the system. And the amount of nitrate loss from Sirsa field shows low nitrate loss but still large compared to the amount of nitrate incited due to bottom flux. Beside irrigation and fertilizer supply the amount of crop uptake and soil texture found inconsequential to the amount of nitrate loss. Generally, from the analysis carried out one can conclude that the amount of nitrate loss from Sirsa irrigation circle was not a threat to the surrounding environment compared to the temperate climatic regions. © 2012 Asmerom T Gebreyesus Key words: Irrigation, fertilization, crop pattern, soil texture, SWAP, ANIMO, nitrate, leaching, bottom flux