Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Pienkowski:Impactof tourismon coastal breedingwaders The impact of tourism on coastal breeding waders in western and southern Europe: an overview M W Pienkowski Pienkowski,M. W. 1992. The impact of tourism on coastal breeding waders in western and southernEurope:an overview. Wader Study Group Bull. 68: 92-96. This briefoverviewis an amendedand updatedversionof a discussionpaper that originally appeared as Pienkowski(1984). Since much of its contents remain relevant, and since it was of restrictedcirculationin its originalform, it is reproducedin this volume. The paper summarises the variousways in which human recreationalpresenceon coasts duringthe summercan affect breeding waders, lists possible protectionmeasures, and outlinestopics where further work is needed. In its originalform the paper was intended to stimulateworkshopdiscussionof the issues; many of its questions remain largely unanswered. M.W. Pienkowski,Joint Nature ConservationCommittee, Monkstone House, City Road, PeterboroughPE1 1JY, U.K. INTRODUCTION Plover C. alexandrinus(Dybbro1970). More recently Prater (1989) has noted that most of the remaining breedingpopulationof Ringed Plovers in southern and eastern England are now restrictedto areas such as nature reserves that are protected from Many coastal conservationproblemsare relevantto waders simplybecause these birds happen to use areas whose habitat is changed by man. Impactson breeding birds often arise because touristsare attracted to many areas becauseof their naturalfeaturesof which waders may form a major part. Any problem that arises may be less concernedwith changesin land use in areas that are of major concern for winteringwaders (see e.g. Davidsonet al. 1991) than with too many people wishingto visit areas as they are, and thereby changingthem. human disturbance. wide-scalechanges are, however,almost impossible to obtain althoughcorrelationalevidence may be very strong (Hilden 1983). Reduction of breeding density. A review of earlier work, together with new observational and experimentalstudies(De Roos 1981) has demonstrateda depression,by the presence of Althoughthere has been some work in this field, much does not appear to be generallyavailable.The main aim of this paper is thereforeto draw togethersome of the currentknowledgeand to discusswhat furtherwork is needed, but it does not attempt a comprehensive review of the subject.Accordinglythe paper consistsbasically of headings which may serve to focus attentionon these two general points. Proof of such man-induced tourists,in nestingdensitiesof Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus,Kentish Plover (see also Schultz& Stock this vol.), Curlew Numenius arquata, and Redshank Tringa totanus in northern areas of the Netherlands,especiallythe islandof Vlieland. . Reductionin breeding productivity.Evidence of this is more difficult to obtain but there is some SOME SUGGESTED PRESENCE EFFECTS OF HUMAN Increased leisure time, wealth, private transportand offroad vehicles have tended to increase the number and relevant material. For example, the only simple correlates of nestingsuccess by Ringed Plovers at Lindisfarne National Nature Reserve, north-east England, were distance from public access and frequency of visits by tourists(Pienkowski 1983b). frequencyof touristvisitsto many coastal areas in Europe. Three main related effects on waders have been suggested. These are: SOME 1. Reductionin breedingrange e.g. of Ringed Plover Charadriushiaticula(Parslow 1967) and Kentish The presence of touristscan influencebreedingwaders in various ways, as set out below. 92 FORMS OF POTENTIAL IMPACT Pienkowski:Impactof tourismon coastal breedingwaders 1. Habitatchange. For example, erosionof dune, beach and saltmarsh habitats by people and especially by vehicles. 2. Disturbance:at feeding sites used by adultsduring layingor incubation;of incubation;or when adults are with young. Unintentionaldisturbanceby tourists of beach-nestingbirds is common (e.g. Pienkowski 1984; Buick & Paton 1989; Melvin et al. 1991) and may also occurin other habitats.ShelducksTadoma tadoma, for example, nesting in rabbitburrowsin dunes may not returnto their nests if peopleare presentin the general area. Males of the same species defend feeding territorieson nearby inter-tidalareas to allow rapid uninterruptedfeeding by the female,whichperformsall the incubation. Human presenceon these areas can totallyprevent feeding,sinceother territorialbirdspreventfeeding in other areas (Pienkowski& Evans 1982). 3. Egg collecting.This stilloccursdespitebeing illegal, except under special licence, in most countries. effects may differ somewhat accordingto the behaviour of the people. In addition,frequency of visits and durationsof stay appear to be two importantelements. HABITAT TYPES The extent of likely problems as well as suitable protectionmeasures may differ considerablyin the various coastal habitats, as described below. Tidal flats. Tidal flats probably present fewer problemsthan some of the other coastal habitats because nests do not occur here and the habitat is not greatly used by tourists,especiallyin the mudd•er areas. Some public usage does, however, occur, particularlyon small coastal areas and sandy parts of the foreshore. In these places there is potentialfor disturbanceto feeding adults and young (see above). , Saltmarshes, brackish marshes and salt-pans. L•ke tidal flats, in many places these areas are not greatly used by the public, but they can attract large numbers of birdwatchers and birdphotographers.All these habitats, even the higher and infrequently inundated tidal marshes, can be important breeding areas for waders (see e.g. Davidson et al. 1991). 5. Introductionof dogs. The presenceof dogs accompanyingtouristsincreasesmany of the effects of humanpresence.Dogs may use scent-trailsfor findingnests, as well as chasing young. , Sand and shingle beaches. Waders breeding in this habitat are under the greatest pressure of disturbancefrom recreationalcoastal use (see above). 6. Attractionof potentialpredatorsinto the general area. This may occur as a resultof easily accessible food such as picnicwaste (Melvin et al. 1991) or even throughthe deliberatefeeding of speciessuch as gulls. , 4. Tramplingof eggs or young.As mostwaders rely on the camouflageof their eggs and young as a major element of defence against predators,and as young tend to crouch to avoid detection, accidental tramplingis a commonfeaturewhere there are many human visitorsto a nesting area. Sand dunes and links. Like beaches, these areas can suffer from being highlyattractive in their own rightto tourists,as well as often being used for access to adjacent beaches. In additionsuch areas are very vulnerableto direct habitatdamage from erosion induced by visitor pressure. 7. Unwittingaid to predators.The presenceof humans can cause increased movement to and from the nest by incubatingbirds.There are some indicationsthat predatorsmay take advantage of these increased movementsto locate nests (e.g. Pienkowski1984). Under normal circumstances, many waders remain on the nest when avian predatorsare the sole immediatethreat since their body camouflageis effectiveat concealingthe locationof the nest. There is also some evidence that the presence of humans in the rearingareas of young Shelducksmay indirectlylead to increaseddepredationof ducklings (Pienkowski& Evans 1982). These effects on breeding waders are often caused by general holiday-makersat the shore, but can also be caused by birdwatchersor bird-photographers. The SOME POSSIBLE PROTECTION MEASURES Measures designedto protectbreedingwaders in coastal habitats fall into seven broad categories, as follows. Enforcementof legal measures and public education. The former is mainly of importancein connectionwith egg-collection.In most areas this is, however, only a minor problem. Public education can also be of benefit in dealingwith egg-collecting where it is a problem. It is also valuable in drawing attentionto a wider publicthat birds do nest in the areas in which the touristsare using for recreation. 93 P•enkowski:Impactof tourismon coastalbreedingwaders 2. Exclusionof vehicles,dogs, etc. These may be usefulmeasuresthat can be put into effect without causing major interferenceto publicaccess. In some areas it may be possibleto make provisionfor limited vehicle access for disabledpersons,and for guidedogs for the blind. 3. 1983). The destructionof predatorsis, however, generallyundesirable.Becausethe eggs of waders oftenform only a minorpart of the diet of such predators(e.g. Pienkowski1984), protectionof the nest may be a more generallyappropriatemeasure. In the case of birdsnestingon a peninsula,electric fencinghas provedto be an affectivetechniquefor preventingaccess by groundpredators(Forster 1975). Public exclusion from small areas of colonial breeding. 4. Public exclusionfrom larger areas of dispersed breeding. Habitat manipulation.Habitat manipulation presentsanotherway of enhancingthe breeding successof coastal breedingwaders. An example 5. Redirectionof publicaccess. This groupof measures •s consideredtogether, since exclusionof the public (where necessary) often works better and is more comes from Lindisfarne Thus the use of nature trailsdirectingmembersof the publicto only part of a sensitivearea have proved usefulin many situations. that RingedPloversnestedfar more denselyin areas where much shingle (which is closely matched by egg camouflage)was presentthan where the groundwas predominantlysand (Pienkowski& Pienkowski1989). Since the number Protectionof coloniallybreedingspecies is obviously somewhat easier than dispersed breeders. Such are often used to restrict access to of breeding Ringed Plovers has decreased in recent years as the covering of sand has vulnerablebreedingseabirdcolonieswhere such measuresat the sametimebenefitbreedingv•aders increased,the potentialmay exist for reversingthis trend by addition of gravel. such as Ringed Plovers. Many waders present rather different,and often larger, problemsas their breedingdensitiesare low and requireprotectionor access restrictionon large areas. An interestingsituationoccursalong parts of the coastsof Germany and the Netherlandswhere a strip of brackishmarshlandoccurs between a pair of sea-defence dykes. In many places these marshes are importantbreedingareas for speciessuch as the Avocet Recurvirostraavosetta and many parts are designated as nature reserves. Good views of these marshesare availablefrom roads runningalong the dykes and birds appear to become accustomed to the presence of people on the roads. Beaches, and to some extent dunes, are probably the mostdifficultareas in whichto provideeffective protectionof large areas for dispersedbreedingbirds since there are high levels of demand for public in have tended to support earlier views that the nesting density of Ringed Plovers is determined largely by the ease with which predatorscan find nests (Pienkowski 1983a,b). These studies found positive if those interested can view the birds concerned, and see the reason for the exclusion. measures National Nature Reserve north-eastEnglandwhere recent habitatchanges SOME ASPECTS WHERE FURTHER STUDY IS NEEDED , Experimentalwork e.g. on the exclusionof various agents. A great number of features have been identifiedas possiblefactorsaffectingthe breeding successof many wader species (e.g. Pienkowski 1983a, Hotker1991) butthere has been ratherlittle experimentaltesting. If managementtechniquesare to be attempted,a good understandingof the various interacting'natural'and human-inducedprocessesis desirable to avoid wasted effort. , Experimentalwork on possiblemanagement techniques.This can developfrom 1 above, to assessthe methodsthat are most economically effective and that cause minimum restrictions on the tourist access to such areas, as well as for those public(see e.g. Melvin et al. 1991). particularlyinterestedin naturalhistory. o 6. Compensatoryexclusionor destructionof predators. The destructionof nest-predatorssuch as Crows Corvuscoronehas sometimesbeen justifiedon the grounds that their populationsmay have been increased by human activities.This appears to be the case in an attempt to improvethe breeding performanceof Oystercatchersin Greece (Goutner 94 Identificationof changes due to 'natural'factors. Furtherresearchis needed here to avoid attributing disturbanceeffectsto man, and then tryingto overcome them, when other more natural factors are responsible.Several problems can be identified: a. many coastal habitatsare subjectto fairly rapid natural change (e.g. Parslow 1967; Pienkowski:Impactof tourismon coastalbreedingwaders Evans & Pienkowski1984); and in some cases these are probablybeing exacerbated by currentlyrisingglobalsea-levels (e.g. Davidson et aL 1991); b, in Europe many wader species are at the edge of their ranges.This impliesthat they may rely naturallyon immigrationfrom the more central pads of their ranges, so observed changes are not necessarilythe result of local processes. Peripheral populationsare, however, of great importancesince they ensure the maintenanceof range and distributionof the species, a keystoneof international conservationeffort (see e.g. Hotker 1991); and c. many of the speciesconcernedare migrants, so that processesacting elsewhere outside the breeding season may be affectingtheir population,for example by loss of wintering habitat (e.g. Goss-Custard& Moser 1988). 4. Identificationof sets of habitats required by particular species for breeding. As indicated above, combinations of habitats in close association may be needed for successfulbreeding by waders. These may include different habitats for feeding by adults, as nest-sites and for rearing the young. Local study is necessaryto identifythe sets of sites which must be considered as single units. Similarly, the areas that harbour the greatest concentrationsof birds may not always be the most productive. For example, a study of Shelducks (Pienkowski & Evans 1982) found that the densest breeding areas appeared to be the least favoured and that these were the least productiveof young. Dispersed breeders produced more young, some of. which recruited into the dense populations which were probably not self-suppporting.Conservation activity was, however, concentrated at the sites holdingdensest Shelduck populations,partly because the above situation had not been known but possiblyalso because concentrationsof birds made a more interestingspectacle for members of conservation organisations.A similar situation in which many wet grasslandbreedingwaders in Europe now appear to be breeding with unsustainablylow productivityis describedby Beintema (1991 ). 5. Gatheringof existinginformation.One further problemis that some of these studieswhich have alreadybeen undertakenhave beenfundedlocally or on a very smallscale and have not subsequently been published.One of the objectivesof this volume is to collatesome of this previouslyinaccessible information. REFERENCES Beintema, A.J. 1991. What makes a meadow bird a meadow bird? In Hotker, H. (ed.), Waders breedingon wet grassland. Wader Study Group Bull. 61, Suppl:3-5. Buick,A.M. & Paton, D.C. 1989. Impactof off-roadvehicles on the nesting success of Hooded Plovers Charadrius rubricollis•n the Coorong Region of South Australia.œmu89: 159-172. Davidson,N.C., Laffoley,D.d'A., Doody,J.P., Way, L.S., Gordon,J, Key, R., Pienkowski, M.W., Mitchell, R. & Duff, K.L. 1991. Nature conservation and estuaries in Great Britain. Nature ConservancyCouncil, Peterborough. De Roos, G.T. 1981. The impactof tourismuponsome breeding wader species on the Isle of Vileland in the Netherlands' Wadden Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, MedelingenLandbouwhogeschool Wageningen 81-14. Dybbro,T. 1970. The KentishPlover(Charadriusalexandrinus)as a breedingbird in Denmark. Dansk Ore. Foren. Tidsskr.64: 205222. Evans, P.R & Pienkowski, M.W. 1984. Populationdynamics of shorebirds.In J. Burger& B.L. Olla (eds.), Shorebirds.Behaviourof marine animals, Vol. 5. Plenum Press, New York. Forster,J.A. 1975. Electricfence to protectSandwichterns against foxes. Biol. Conserv. 7: 85. Goss-Custard,J.D. & Moser, M.E. 1988. Rates of change in the numbers of dunlin,Calidrisalpina,winteringin Britishestuaries•n relationto the spreadof Spartinaangefica.J. AppliedEcology 25: 95-109. Goutner, V. 1983. The breeding ecology of the Oystercatcher HaematopusostralegusL. in the Evros Delta, Greece. Wader Study Group Bull. 39: 45-46. Hilden, O. 1983. Recent populationchanges of waders in Finlandand their causes. pp 13-16 in P.R. Evans, H. Hafner & P. L'Herm•te (eds.), Shorebirdsand large waterbirdsconservation. Commissionof the EuropeanCommunities,Brussels. Hotker, H. (ed.) 1991. Waders breedingon wet grassland. Wader Study Group Bull. 61, Suppl. Melvin, S.C., Griffin,C.R. & Maclvor, L.H. 1991. Recovery strategies for Piping Plovers in managed coastal landscapes.Coastal Management 19:21-34. Parslow,J.L.F. 1967. Changes in status among breedingbirds in Britain and Ireland. Brit. Birds 60: 97-123. Pienkowski,M.W. 1983a. The impactof tourismon coastal breeding shorebirdsin western and southernEurope:an introductionto general discussion.In P.R. Evans, H. Hafner & P. L'Hermite (eds.), Shorebirdsand large waterbirdsconservation. Commissionof the European Communities, Brussels. Pienkowski,M.W. 1983b. Habitatspecialisationin breedingshorebirds:a defencestrategyagainstegg-predation?WaderStudy Group Bull.39: 50. Pienkowski,M.W. 1984. Breedingbiologyand populationdynamicsof Ringed Plovers Charadriushiaticulain Britain and Greenland nest-predation as a possiblefactor'limiting distribution and timing of breeding. J. Zool. London202:83-114. Pienkowski,M.W. & Evans, P.R. 1982. Breedingbehaviour,producbvity and survival of colonial and non-colonial Shelducks Tadorna tadoma. ¸mis Scand. 13:101-116. 95 Pienkowski:Impact of tourism on coastal breeding waders Pienkowski, M.W. & Pienkowski,A.E. 1989. Limitationby nesting habitat of the densityof breedingRinged Plovers Charadrius hiaticula: a natural experiment. Wildfowl40:115-126. 96 Prater, A.J. 1989. RingedPlover Charadriushiaticulabreeding populationof the United Kingdomin 1984. Bird Study 36: 154-159.