Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Y’s strategy Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1 a, a b, c Strategy 2 c, b d, d X’s strategy Figure 10.1 Two player binary choice games. Y’s strategy X’s strategy Pollute Abate Pollute 0, 0 5, -2 Abate -2, 5 3, 3 Figure 10.2 A two-player pollution abatement game. Y’s strategy X’s strategy Defect (Pollute) Cooperate (Abate) Defect (Pollute) 2, 2 4, 1 Cooperate (Abate) 1, 4 3, 3 Figure 10.3 The two-player pollution abatement Prisoners’ Dilemma game: ordinal form. Y’s strategy Pollute Abate Pollute -4, -4 5, -2 Abate -2, 5 3, 3 X’s strategy Figure 10.4 A two-player Chicken game. Figure 10.5 Extensive form of Chicken game. Y’s choice Pollute Pollute (-4, -4) Abate (5, -2) X’s choice Abate Pollute Abate (-2, 5) (3,3) B’s strategy Do not Contribute Contribute Do not contribute 0, 0 0, -8 Contribute -8, 0 4, 4 A’s strategy Figure 10.6 A two-player Assurance game. Figure 10.7 The payoffs to one country from abating and from not abating as the number of other countries abating varies. Figure 10.8 The payoffs to one country from abating and from not abating as the number of other countries abating varies: alternative set of parameter values. 70 60 50 40 30 20 NBP 10 NBA 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Figure 10.9 The payoffs to one country from abating and from not abating as the number of other countries abating varies: third set of parameter values (a = 0, b =5, c = 3 and d = 3). 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 NBP 15 NBA 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Figure 10.10 A comparison of the non-cooperative and full cooperative solutions to an environmental public good problem. MB MCi MBi ZN ZC Z Figure 10.11 A one shot Prisoners’ Dilemma game. B’s strategy Defect Cooperate Defect P, P T, S Cooperate S, T R,R A’s strategy Figure 10.12 The two-shot Prisoners’ Dilemma game. B’s strategy Defect Cooperate Defect 2P, 2P T+P, S+P Cooperate S+P, T+P R+P,R+P A’s strategy Figure 10.13 (the old Figure 13.1) Incremental SO2 concentrations from an oil combined cycle power station located in Lauffen, Germany. Source: ExternE (1995), page 61. Fig.10.14 (old Figure 13.8) United Kingdom year 2000 total abatement cost curve. Source: Halkos and Hutton, 1993, page 5 Figure 10.15 (old Figure 13.9) Cooperative and non-cooperative pollution outcomes in the presence of international pollution spillovers. Figure 10.16. Qualitative directions of SRES scenarios for different indicators. (Source: IPCC(3), Figure TS.1, page 24) Figure 10.17. IPCC: Comparison of reference and stabilisation scenarios. (Source: IPCC(3), Figure TS.2, page 25) Figure 10.18 (the old Figure 13.2 with one correction) Trade and the environment.