* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Flow label for equal cost multipath routing in tunnels
Water metering wikipedia , lookup
Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup
Lift (force) wikipedia , lookup
Bernoulli's principle wikipedia , lookup
Wind tunnel wikipedia , lookup
Computational fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Flow measurement wikipedia , lookup
Reynolds number wikipedia , lookup
Flow conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Aerodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Flow label for equal cost multipath routing in tunnels draft-carpenter-flow-ecmp-02 Brian Carpenter University of Auckland Shane Amante Level 3 Communications, LLC July 2010 1 The problem with tunnels Path1 Source TEP ECMP Router Dest TEP Path2 Normal traffic split by ECMP. Tunnel traffic all has same 5-tuple; no split. 2 Proposed solution For foo-in-IPv6 tunnels, the source TEP sets a flow label per user flow in the outer packet - - For IP-in-IPv6, the flow label is based on the 5-tuple of the inner packet It should be well distributed (pseudo-random) Intermediate ECMP or LAG paths use hash based on 6-tuple, the normal 5-tuple plus the flow label - works the same as before for non-tunnel traffic (and even better if flow label is set) - also splits tunnel traffic - fully conformant with RFC 3697 Caveat: would not work in Inter-AS scenarios if the IPv6 flow label is allowed to be ‘mutable’ … 3 Changes from -01 to -02 Provided further background information Incorporated LAG (Link Aggregation) Changed to BCP language in Section 3, “Guidelines” to provide better guidance Added new co-author Next Steps Adopt as WG draft? Thank you!