Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Markarian 421 with MAGIC telescope Daniel Mazin for the MAGIC Collaboration Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München [email protected] Outline The MAGIC telescope AGN Markarian 421 Data sample Analysis status Conclusion / outlook The MAGIC Telescope The largest imaging atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope with 236 m2 mirror surface 3.5° FoV Camera with 576 high-QE PMT’s Design optimized for: Low energy threshold E = 30 GeV Fast repositioning tp < 30 sec Canarian Island La Palma, 2200 m asl AGN Markarian 421 Right Ascension 11:04:27 (h:m:s) Declination: +38:12:32 (deg:m:s) BL Lac object, z=0.030 (370 MLy) Mass: 1.9 •108 M First detected extragalactic TeV -ray source (Punch et al, 1992) Many known flares, active in 2004 Well described by SSC models (e.g. Konopelko et al, ApJ,597:851) Still many correlations not understood Aimo Sillanpaa, NOT Advantages of simultaneous observations HEGRA, A&A,393,89 One experiment: one decade in energy Two experiments: two decades Multiwavelength campaigns Correlation studies Change hardness during flares (Krennrich et al, ICRC 2003) Light curves, look for fast flares HEGRA, A&A,410,813 + X-calibration of the instruments MAGIC data sample Date comments February 2004 flare, commissioning phase April 2004 Strong flare, December 2004 Overlap with HESS, commissioning phase Overlap with HESS This talk Preliminary results (sky plot of number of excess events): MAGIC data sample (December 04) Triggered by RXTE and VERITAS (Dec 14) After a few hours: MAGIC and HESS agreed to make simultaneous observations Due to bad weather only 2 days of MAGIC data: 18 and 19 December Date Obs.time Mean zenith angle (deg) comments 18 Dec 55 min 48 30 min with HESS 18 Dec 59 min 12.5 19 Dec 30 min 51 19 Dec 79 min 21 30 min with HESS Comparison of MC predictions and data Good agreement between mc-gamma and excess events Log10(Etrue[GeV]) Estimate of energy resolution SIZE (total number of Sigma[%] Log10(Eest[GeV]) (Eest -Etrue)/Etrue Log10(Eest[GeV]) PEs) simplest energy estimator improve energy estimation including other image parameters optimized estimator using Random Forest technique 20% (30%) @ 1 TeV (100 GeV) Number of excess events For the whole data sample (3.7h): After cuts: over 700 excess events Point-like source ( < 0.15 deg ) 37.69 38.19 Dec (deg) 38.69 39.19 Mrk 421: False source plot 11.14 11.10 11.07 11.04 11.00 RA (h) Alpha plots 18/12/05, <Zd>=48 18/12/05, <Zd>=12 For the 4 samples: Clear signal detection in all of them 19/12/05, <Zd>=51 19/12/05, <Zd>=21 Energy range for this analysis: high zenith angle: 250 GeV – 2 TeV low zenith angle: 100 GeV – 1 TeV Light curve (X-ray) 17-20 December 2004 18/12 19/12 X-rays: no significant variation Optical data (KVA): quiescent state Apr 04 Dec 04 Light curve (GeV, MAGIC) Low zenith angle points only, 20 min bins No strong variations visible Looks like we just missed the peak of the flare (weather!) 4004 4005 (mjd-49353) Soon to come: Energy spectrum and full light curve for the MAGIC data Combined MAGIC – HESS data analysis Conclusions / Outlook MAGIC clearly detected a flare of Markarian 421 in December 2004 Due to bad weather: too late for the peak of the flare 3.7 hours of data: enough statistics to produce light curves and energy spectra work in progress Coordinated ground based Cherenkov telescopes observations going on Almost full time coverage possible (CANGAROO, HESS, VERITAS, MAGIC) Up to 3 decades in energy due to energy threshold and different zenith angle conditions Thank you