Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IOOS First Annual Implementation Conference 31 August to 2 September Preliminary Agenda Outline Ocean.US, in consultation with its Executive Committee, has drafted a preliminary conceptual outline for the conference (below) for your review and comment. Your responses to the following questions will help better define objectives, specify deliverables and finalize the agenda: What do you want to get out of the conference and how should we shape the agenda to achieve these ends? What deliverables do you need from each session and what is the desired outcome of day-3? Goal and Objectives Ocean.US has been working with federal agencies (NOAA, NASA, NSF, Navy, EPA, ACE, USGS, MMS, and USCG) to draft a preliminary implementation plan for the initial IOOS that reflects both national and regional priorities for IOOS development.1 The final plan (which will be revised and updated annually) will recommend priorities that federal agencies may use to establish funding priorities for their contributions to the implementation, operation and improvement of the initial IOOS. The conference will provide a forum for the leaders of nascent regional associations to work directly with participating federal agencies to help finalize this document. The objectives are to formulate recommendations for the following: (1) phased implementation of the initial IOOS infrastructure using existing operational observing subsystem assets (FY 05-06) and (2) phased enhancements of the initial IOOS. Ocean.US is proposing to use the conference to achieve consensus on the way forward much like the 2002 Airlie House workshop was used to develop a consensus on a design for an IOOS that includes both global ocean-climate and coastal components. Participants Representatives from federal agencies (e.g., program managers), nascent regional associations (leader from each), and the USGSC. 1 Procedure Ocean.US envisions a product-driven process for developing a prioritized, phased implementation plan for the near term (the initial system using existing assets: FY 0507) and the longer term (enhancing the initial system: FY 05-14). By “productdriven”, it is meant that, beginning with specification of a product, (1) determine capabilities required for data analysis (including modeling), data management and communications, data telemetry, and measurements to serve the data and information required to produce the produce; and (2) formulate phased, prioritized implementations plans for developing these capabilities. This has been done for the global ocean-climate component, but not for the coastal component. Thus, the conference will focus on the development of the coastal component and coordination between its development and that of the global component. Proposed Agenda Outline Days-1 and -2 Introduction 1. Overview of the preliminary implementation plan, conference goals, deliverables and procedures (Tom Malone) 2. Discussion to clarify issues related to the IP, goals, deliverables and procedures (Panel led by members of the Ocean.US EXCOM, Director of Ocean.US, Chair of NFRA Organizing Committee) Priorities for Implementation The focus here is on developing the capabilities for the provision of data and information needed to produce specific products. 3. Near Term (FY 05-06) Implementation of the Coastal Component Given the short list of products derived from products recommended in the preliminary implementation plan2, formulate recommendations for phased implementation of elements/programs needed to develop capabilities needed to provide required data and information at specified rates with known precision and accuracy. It is anticipated that this will focus on DMAC development and modeling. 2 4. Longer Term (FY05-14) Enhancements to the Coastal Component Given the short list of products (to be determined), formulate recommendations for phased implementation of elements/programs needed to improve capabilities to provide required data and information at specified rates with known precision and accuracy. It is anticipated that this session will focus on R&D needs, continued DMAC development, incorporation of additional elements that are already operational, and improving existing operational elements of the IOOS. 5. Near and Long Term Global Ocean-Climate Component Following a brief review of the global plan, the status of implementation, and future developments, discuss the interdependencies of the global and coastal components and formulate recommendations for coordinated development of both components. 6. DMAC Following a brief discussion of the DMAC Plan, key issues and opportunities (including recommended next steps for developing DMAC capabilities), formulate recommendations for developing and implementing a set of best data management, communications and archiving practices (hereafter termed as “standards”) for sustained observations/observatory data and metadata. A key question is how to establish a sustainable process that will lead to the early identification and subsequent evolution of DMAC standards that can be implemented, are cost effective, efficient and responsive to provider, user, and sponsor (funding) needs. Essentially, “How do we get there from here?” 7. Development of Regional Associations Following a summary of the rationale for federal investment in the development of RAs and RCOOSs, current status of RA and RCOOS development, and next steps, formulate recommendations for timely establishment of regional associations and the NFRA with estimated costs (FY 05-06). 8. Summary Draft of conference consensus statements discussed, modified and agreed to. This is intended to provide guidance and a starting point for discussion on day 3. It is expected that there will be issues that require further discussion and time will be available. 3 Day-3 Federal Representatives meet with Ocean.US to formulate realistic options for IOOS development based on the outcomes of days 1 and 2. FOOTNOTES 1 The preliminary plan will be completed and made available to all workshop participants at least two weeks prior to the conference. Recommendations are made for an initial IOOS to be build using existing observing subsystem assets and for enhancements to that system. 2 Based on results from the Airlie House workshop, a set of products and programs needed to produce them are recommended in the preliminary implementation plan for the near term. These are as follows: 1) Sea surface wind, surface atmospheric pressure, and wave and current spatial distributions; 2) Interannual changes in annual mean sea level on regional and national scales; 3) Surface and interior fields of temperature, salinity, and carbon; 4) Heat, water, and carbon fluxes across the air-sea interface; and 5) Sea ice distribution and volume. 6) Surface and interior fields of phytoplankton biomass (chlorophyll-a) and macrozooplankton abundance; 7) Annual assessments of the spatial extent and condition of coral reefs, sea grass beds, kelp beds, tidal marshes, and mangrove forests; 8) Abundance and distribution of living marine resources (including protected species); and 9) Integrated, nationwide estimates of annual land-sea freshwater flows and associated fluxes of sediments, nutrients, and contaminants. Products have yet to be specified to help guide enhancements over the longer term. Over the next few weeks, Ocean.US will work with its Executive Committee and nascent regional associations to agree on a short list to be served both near-term (from the list above) and long-term. The latter may include new products that require the development of new capabilities through R&D (research and pilot projects), improving existing operational capabilities with proven technologies, or incorporating additional operational programs that were not recommended for the initial IOOS. 4