* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 7 Practice Questions
Comparative advantage wikipedia , lookup
General equilibrium theory wikipedia , lookup
Market penetration wikipedia , lookup
Grey market wikipedia , lookup
Competition law wikipedia , lookup
Marginalism wikipedia , lookup
Market (economics) wikipedia , lookup
Supply and demand wikipedia , lookup
Externality wikipedia , lookup
Market failure wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 7 Practice Questions 1) a) Explain the relationship in the short run between the marginal costs of a firm and its average total costs. Short run costs of production is inversely proportional to the labor productive – labor is usually the main variable cost because it can be increased or decreased immediately. The marginal cost refers the the cost incurred with each additional unit and is found by dividng the change in total cost with the change in total output per hour. Average total costs refer to the average cost of each good and is found by dividing the total cost by the total output per hour. Marginal costs decline at first, but then increase. This is due to the law of diminishing returns: “as additional units of a variable resources are added to fixed resources, beyond a certain point the marginal product of the variable resource will decline” (Maley & Welker, 2011). The curve of marginal cost intersects the curve of average total cost at its lower point – after the intersection, the average total cost starts to increase. This is because at that point the marginal product of the variable resource has started to decrease; even though the costs for the producer have become higher, they aren’t able to produce as much to make up for those costs. This explains why the average total cost eventually increases. b) Define the law of diminishing returns and assess the likelihood that it will be experienced by a firm producing a product in a consumer good market. Like I’ve written in my answer above, the law of diminishing returns says that as additional units of a variable resources (generally labor) are added to fixed resources (generally land and capital), beyond a certain point the marginal product of the variable resource will decline (Maley & Welker, 2011). The likelihood of a firm experiencing this in a consumer good market is highly probable because in the short term, the firm is only able to change its variable resources in order to produce more efficiently. If business is booming for a café, for example, in the short term, they’ll only be able to change the labor (a variable resource) by hiring more workers or asking the workers to work longer hours. At first, the marginal product as well as the total product for each additional worker hired will increase. However, after a while the café will experience diminishing marginal returns because hiring more workers doesn’t contribute to more efficient production; in fact, it could even make production less effective. This is because the fixed resources haven’t changed: the café is still the same size and has the same tools, but now it has a lot more workers (that may or may not actually be working efficiently) that all need to be paid a salary. Chapter 8 Practice Questions 1) a) Using a suitable diagram, explain the difference between short-run equilibrium and long run equilibrium in perfect competition. There is a difference between the short-run equilibrium and the long-run equilibrium in perfect competition because of the changes that the firm is able to make. In the short run, the firm is only able to change its variable resources (usually labor), so the changes that it can make in supply is small compared to the changes in market price. However, in the long run, the firm is able to change its fixed resources (capital, land) as well – this means that the firm can change its supply a lot more compared to the changes in price. Also in the long-term, firms can leave or enter the industry and this would affect all of the firms involved. When firms produce at their short-run equilibrium, they experience economic profits or losses; when they produce at their long-term equilibrium, all firms break even. Because there are no barriers to exit or entry, firms are free to enter or leave the market. http://www.raybromley.com/notes/equilchange.html http://justdan93.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/profit-maximization-in-long-run-pure-competitive-market/ If a firm experienced an economic loss in the short run, it is likely to leave the market. When other firms see that this industry could be lucrative, they are likely to join the market. Entry of new firms to the industry causes an increase in supply, which then decrease the equilibrium price. This means that firms that were previously making a profit would now be breaking even or making a smaller profit. Entry also causes an increase in competition so that the firms cannot raise their prices (because then consumers would opt to buy the goods from other firms who offer it for lower prices), if they want to stay in business. Therefore, in the long term, all firms would be breaking even. b) To what extent is the perfectly competitive market likely to exist in the real world? In a perfectly competitive market, there are very many firms with no market power that all produce homogeneous goods. There are also no barriers to entry or exit. This type of market is not common – in fact, our textbook says that this is “mostly theoretical.” Other characteristics of perfectly competitive markets are that they don’t have any shortages or surpluses and they are an example of perfect efficiency. This makes sense because “efficiency decreases as markets become less competitive” (Maley & Welker, 2011). Perfectly competitive markets are so rare because they have no barriers to entry and exit, and all markets have some type of barriers (even thought they may be low). However, there are markets that have some of the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market , such as firms in the agricultural commodities industry. 2) a) Using a diagram, explain how allocative and productive efficiency will be achieved in long-run equilibrium in perfect competition. In a perfectly competitive market, productive efficiency is achieved by lowering the average cost of production to the minimum. If the firm produces the quantity at which its marginal cost is equal to its marginal revenue, it is maximizing its profits; however, it hasn’t achieved maximum efficiency. In order for the firm to produce as maximum efficiency, it needs to produce the quantity that corresponds to the minimum average total cost. Allocative efficiency is achieved when the firm’s marginal cost is equal to the price of the goods. This indicates that the firm is allocating its resources efficiently (in efficient quantities and combinations), in a way that is the most favorable to the society. http://increasing-returns.blogspot.jp/2007/04/allocative-and-productive-efficiency-in.html The long-run equilibrium is the point at which firms are breaking even; the point where marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost. This is also the point at which the average total cost is at its minimum, thus achieving productive efficiency. Because the market price is equal to average total cost, the firms are have also achieved allocative efficiency. b) Evaluate the view that consumers, not producers, are the main beneficiaries of perfectly competitive market structures. Consumers, not producers, are the main beneficiaries of perfectly competitive market structures because in this type of market, the producers are price-takers – they will supply goods at the price that consumers want. If a firm decides to sell its goods for a higher price (in a perfectly competitive market), then ceteris paribus, consumers will purchase the goods from other firms who sell at a lower price. The consumers are able to do this because in perfectly competitive markets, the goods are homologous.